Connect with us

Editorials

Set Report Part 1: Bringing Kirkman’s ‘The Walking Dead’ to Life

Published

on

Hands down the most anticipated horror project of 2010 is AMC TV’s The Walking Dead, a new series that’s set to premiere this coming October. Bloody Disgusting was lucky enough to spend a day on the set in Atlanta, Georgia to witness the great Frank Darabont (The Mist) filming the pilot episode. Adapted from Robert Kirkman’s astounding Image comic franchise, the project is set among a group of zombie survivors of an apocalypse who are led by a police officer, Rick Grimes, in search of a safe place to live. Each week over the next month we’ll be unrolling a new piece that’ll take you dear readers behind-the-scenes of what could be the horror event of the year. If “Breaking Bad” and “Mad Men” weren’t enough, are you willing to become one of “The Walking Dead”?

PREVIEW | PART 1 | PART 2 | PART 3 | PART 4 (new piece each week)

Zombies have enjoyed quite a resurgence over the past decade, from the emergence of speedy zombies in DAWN OF THE DEAD and 28 DAYS LATER (to the chagrin of some zombie purists) and on to the reemergence of zombie godfather George A. Romero with three new DEAD films to cap off the aughts. But for true flesh cravers, a few movies a year simply isn’t enough. If all goes well, longtime zombie lover Frank Darabont hopes to deliver your next dosage of undead on a weekly basis.

Based on the long-running comic by Robert Kirkman, THE WALKING DEAD will debut during AMC’s Fearfest this October. The critically acclaimed network hopes to see DEAD’s hero Rick Grimes (Andrew Lincoln) landing Emmy nods alongside Don Draper (Jon Hamm) and Walter White (Bryan Cranston) this time next year. They also plan to set some new standards for the level of acceptable gore on television before all is said and done.

Along with Lincoln as Grimes, DEAD’s cast includes Jon Bernthal as Shane, Sarah Wayne Callies as Lori, Laurie Holden as Andrea and Emma Bell as Amy. Darabont will serve as executive producer as well as writer and director of the pilot; Kirkman will exec producer along with Gale Anne Hurd; and makeup master Greg Nicotero will make the zombies look, well, horrific. And if the first images we’ve seen so far are any indication, his work will be beyond anything else we’ve previously seen on television.

BLOODY-DISGUSTING spent a day sweltering on the Atlanta sets during production of the pilot episode. Over the course of our visit, we spoke to Darabont, Lincoln, Bernthal, Kirkman, Hurd and Nicotero. We got some background on the series’ development, bringing the production to Atlanta and what zombie school is all about. We even got to see a few zombies in the flesh and flip through some eerie, blood-soaked stills from production.

Part 1: Bringing Kirkman’s Walking Dead to Life

Like many projects these days, it all started with a trip to the comic shop. “He picked it up in a comic shop because somebody had told him it was a good zombie book and he loves all things zombie,” Kirkman says of Darabont’s initial discovery of the WALKING DEAD books. “He really enjoyed it and started asking around town and Hollywood to see what was going on with it and he found his way to my manager. That was a long time ago.

Darabont first struck a deal up with NBC, but it wasn’t meant to be. “They were very excited about the idea of doing a zombie show until I handed them a zombie script where zombies were actually doing zombie shit,” laughs Darabont. “And so, after that I shopped it around and got a lot of doors slammed in my face is the truth of it. It languished for a bit, as things do in Hollywood.

Enter Gale Anne Hurd. “I’d heard about it,” Hurd tells press. “When I first read the book, I thought, ‘This would be a great film’ and boy was I wrong. It’s a much better TV series. Fast forward, I knew that Frank had initially developed it for NBC, which to me seemed like an odd pairing for this. Then I heard it wasn’t going forward at NBC, so I talked to Frank.

Gale was tremendously instrumental in jump-starting it at a point where it felt like it was languishing,” says Darabont. “I’d gotten turned down enough times, which is no reflection on the material, but no matter what you’re trying to sell in Hollywood, you’re Willy Loman and it’s DEATH OF A SALESMAN. You’re out there trying to sell shit that nobody wants. Even if it’s good shit.

DEAD is the first work of Kirkman’s to be adapted and, considering the pedigree attached, he’s pretty pleased with the way things have gone. “I was telling Gale the other day, ‘This is the first thing I’ve had adapted and I have no sense of what this is actually like because Frank is the director, Gale Anne Hurd is the producer,” says Kirkman. “The stuff that AMC is going to put on air is crazy. They keep showing me things and I’m like, you’re not doing that. They rip a horse open and there’s just spaghetti coming out. They actually have things that you see.

Though the adaptation is by no means a frame-for-frame WATCHMEN-style translation, Kirkman says DEAD is very faithful to his original work and, in some cases, might even improve on his ideas. “Reading that pilot was just a revelation,” says Kirkman. “It’s extremely faithful. There are things that are so much like the comic, I can’t really remember the nuance of what’s different and what’s not from the comic. He’s definitely being more faithful than I expected and everything that he’s changing is brilliant. I couldn’t be happier. I think the fans of the book are going to just love it.

Darabont wrote the pilot episode and will also direct. Five other directors will then take the reigns for the initial six-episode run. “We have six different directors,” confirms Hurd. “We haven’t announced who they are yet. Frank can’t direct them all because obviously we have a very tight post production schedule. But he will be here on set and as executive producer, which is the case with most show runners, for every episode. The biggest problem was to say, ‘Frank, we cannot clone you and you can’t where all these hats.’

I have to put my pilot through the editing and post process,” adds Darabont. “Plus I’ve got to get back to L.A. and kind of ride heard on the writers generating the subsequent episodes. I’ve written the first two. I’ve got four scripts yet to come in and time is getting short. My intention is not to be an absentee landlord. I love this thing and I really want to keep my hand very much in the process. I don’t want to be one of those guys who gets a show set up, directs the pilot and then buggers off and is never heard from again.

Darabont wrote the first two episodes. And Kirkman himself will pen Episode 4. “He’s terrific,” says Hurd of Kirkman’s script work. “For a first-timer, all those years writing comic books was great training. We also have Chic Eglee who most recently came from DEXTER and before that THE SHIELD and DARK ANGEL. And also Jack LoGiudice who came to us from SONS OF ANARCHY and Adam Fierro, who actually wrote the episode of THE SHIELD that Frank directed. And Glen Mazzara, who’s also from THE SHIELD.

If the series succeeds, Season Two will be AMC’s normal 13-episode order. Darabont says it’s likely he’ll return to write and direct some of those episodes as well. Despite confidence that the series will be well received, Darabont says he’s not getting ahead of himself. The most important thing now is to deliver the best six episodes possible. From what we’ve seen so far, WALKING DEAD should be a real treat for horror fans.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading