Connect with us

Editorials

Horror Retrospective: 1932 (Editorial)

Published

on

Article by Geoff Fogleman

Welcome to 1932 – a year that gave us some truly gruesome horror. After bringing Dracula to the screen in 1931, Tod Browning got his Freaks on in a major way and proved beyond a doubt that he and James Whale were the go-to early horror directors. Speaking of James Whale, his The Old Dark House showcased the often comedic side of horror, and the film allowed him to show his versatility behind the camera. We were also terrified (yet again) by Boris Karloff in Universal’s The Mummy, became a captive on The Island of Lost Souls, and were sucked in to a wonderful low-budget take on vampire lore in Carl Th. Dreyer’s Vampyr.

Of course, this weekly editorial is only one person’s opinion, and my reasons for creating it are two-fold: 1) to hopefully introduce you to some early horror films that you may not be aware of, and 2) to foster discussion about classic horror. I’m hoping that if you have a dissenting opinion (which you surely do!), then you’ll comment on my lists and post your own in the comments section. Happy watching!

THE YEAR: 1932

FREAKS
(D) Tod Browning
(W) Clarence “Tod” Robbins
(S) Wallace Ford, Leila Hyams, and Olga Baclanova
If you’ve never seen Freaks then stop reading this and go watch it right now. Seriously, the list will be here when you get back . . . finished watching yet? Good. Freaks is not only the best horror film of 1932, it’s one of the best horror films of all time. Cleopatra (Baclanova) is a lovely circus trapeze artist who professes her love for Hans (Harry Earles). What’s the big deal, right? Well Hans is a midget in the circus side show, and, despite his fellow freaks’ insistence that Cleopatra is using him, Hans falls for her. As it turns out, Cleopatra doesn’t want Hans – she’s having an affair with circus strongman Hercules (Henry Victor) – but she does want the large sum of money that he’s set to inherit. The story climaxes with Hans and Cleopatra’s wedding party, where she drunkenly confesses her disdain for the freaks. At the risk of spoiling anything, let’s just say that the freaks get their revenge in chilling fashion (you have to love Pre-Code horror!). I’ve watched Freaks about a dozen times, and it still gives me nightmares, which is exactly what the best horror is supposed to do.

freaks-1932

ISLAND OF LOST SOULS
(D) Erle C. Kenton
(W) Waldemar Young and Philip Wylie
(S) Charles Laughton, Richard Arlen, and Bela Lugosi
This is one of several film adaptations of H.G. Wells’s The Island of Dr. Moreau, and it’s also one of the best. After being shipwrecked, Edward Parker (Arlen) is rescued by a freighter filled with animals and headed toward an island owned by Dr. Moreau (Laughton). A disagreement with the captain of the boat (Stanley Fields) ensues, and Parker is left with little choice but to accompany Moreau to the island, where he quickly becomes aware that all is not what it seems. The atmosphere of dread, the excellent make-up, and outstanding performances by all involved are what make Island of Lost Souls stand out. If you want a fun double bill, watch this one and then Don Taylor’s The Island of Dr. Moreau (1977) – just stay away from the awful 1996 version!

ISLAND OF LOST SOULS-1932

THE OLD DARK HOUSE
(D) James Whale
(W) Benn W. Levy
(S) Boris Karloff, Melvyn Douglas, and Charles Laughton
Based on the novel by J.B. Priestley, The Old Dark House is one of the earliest (and finest) examples of the horror comedy genre. The story revolves around a group of five travelers who seek shelter from a storm at the titular manse. Little do they know that the house belongs to the decidedly crazy Fenn family and their mute butler, Morgan (Karloff). After some ominous exchanges between the travelers, things really heat up when a drunken Morgan releases Saul (Brember Wills), a pyromaniac who attempts to set the house on fire at every opportunity. Once again Karloff plays a role in which he must act under heavy makeup and grunt a lot, and he’s wonderful.

THE OLD DARK HOUSE-1932

THE MUMMY
(D) Karl Freund
(W) John L. Balderston
(S) Boris Karloff, Zita Johann, and David Manners
Speaking of Karloff being under heavy makeup and grunting a lot, we get yet another stand out performance from him in The Mummy. Karloff plays Imhotep, a former Egyptian priest who was mummified while still alive for sacrilege. Imhotep is resurrected when an archaeological team finds his body and recites the spell from The Scroll of Thoth (don’t these guys know you should never read aloud in horror movies?). All Imhotep wants to do when he is resurrected is find his former lover, the princess Ankh-es-en-amon, and he escapes to the streets of Cairo to do so. Fast forward ten years from his resurrection, and Imhotep, who now goes by the name Ardath Bay, is living comfortably in Cairo yet still searching for his lost love. The plot culminates with Bay finding Helen Grosvenor (Johann) – the woman he believes is the modern incarnation of Ankh-es-en-amon. Bay wants to mummify Grosvenor then resurrect her so that the two former lovers can be together forever. There’s really nothing quite like a quiet evening of mummification and resurrection to really set the mood. Karloff proves the bromide, as he did in Frankenstein, that you can’t keep a good man down.

The-Mummy-1932-Boris-Karloff

VAMPYR
(D) Carl Th. Dreyer
(W) Christen Jul and Carl Th. Dreyer
(S) Julian West, Maurice Schutz, and Rena Mandel
You want creepy? This little gem from Danish filmmaker Carl Theodore Dreyer fits the bill nicely. The visuals in Vampyr alone are enough to recommend this film – think German Expressionism meets Gothic architecture – but we are fortunate to get an intriguing story line as well. While staying at an inn, Allan Gray (West) receives a small package with a note containing the cryptic instructions “To be opened upon my death.” His curiosity aroused, Gray follows a series of shadows to a looming castle, where he witnesses the murder of the man who gave him the parcel. After some eerie events Gray decides to open the package, and he finds a copy of a book on Vampyrs. Gray becomes convinced that the mysterious goings on in the castle and surrounding village are due to vampire activity, and it’s up to him to save the day (not to mention the damsel). As an added bonus, the Vampyr DVD and Blu-ray are available on Criterion, so now the iconic cinematography is much clearer than in previous versions.

VAMPYR-1932

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading