Connect with us

Editorials

Celebrating ‘A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors’ 28th Anniversary!

Published

on

Twenty-eight years later, the message behind Chuck Russell’s 1987 cult classic A Nightmare On Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors still rings clear: parents need to listen to their kids. The second feature, Freddy’s Revenge, gets sidetracked using Krueger as a metaphor for the person inside of Jesse, desperate to get out, and loses steam when it breaks its own rules and has Fred out in the open, roaming a pool party instead of dreamland. The third installment, however, puts the fear back in Freddy, by getting back to basics, and reiterating the lesson that the original film sought to teach — the consequences of pushing a child’s concerns aside; and dismissing their woes as immature and fleeting.

As the opening credits roll, we dream Dream Warrior Patricia Arquette using the power of cocoa powder, soda, Dokken, and paper mache to stop herself from nodding off. It’s quite obvious that this isn’t the first time sweet little Kristen has used this questionable combination to stay awake, and as her mother enters her room all dressed up and ticked off, it soon becomes clear that this also doesn’t mark the first time her mom has come home late. When her mother, Elaine, demands an explanation for her antics, Kristen reveals that she’s only trying to avert her bad dreams, and the man with the burnt face that waits for her in the realm beyond consciousness. It’s obvious that Elaine has heard this all before, and she has much more important matters to attend to, like the man she’s brought home, waiting downstairs, calling to her to join him in drunken negligence. Despite her pleas, Kristen’s mother leaves her in darkness, doomed to meet the shadowy figure with razor fingers yet again, who’ll steal her sleep, and her youth.

Kristen’s latest dream puts her in her own bathroom, where Freddy smiles back at her from her mirror. Suddenly, her appliances spring to life, as her sink begins to grow, and razors pop out from the handles, and, to her horror, extend like arms reaching out to grab her. As Kristen screams in sheer terror, she awakens, and sees her mother entering the bathroom. As reality settles, we see what’s really been happening, or at least what Kristen’s mother sees: Kristen, wrists slit, holding a razor, and crying for help. As soon as her little outburst occurs, Kristen’s mother ships her off to the psych ward, where she meets other teens like herself, who also suffer from terrible nightmares. At the first sign of real trouble, Elaine throws her hands up in the air, abandons her responsibilities, and blames the victim, by concurring that Kristen has brought all of this drama on herself, and therefore can only fix it herself. While it is true that Kristen must find the strength within her own mind to conquer the demons that plagues her thoughts, without the aid of another, she’ll be just like the rest of the poor souls Krueger has claimed: paralyzed in fear and unable to shake herself awake.

Enter Nancy Thompson; the sole survivor of Fred Krueger. She may have been absent in the second film, but Nancy returns to the third installment with a role that’s both appropriate and necessary, as the helping hand. Through the use of booby traps and bravery, Nancy managed to outsmart Krueger in the past, and now she’s back to teach other kids how to do the same. Although she starts as the intern at the ward, it’s not long before she’s helping the children work through their fears, simply because she’s the only one who will take their issues seriously. Kids are dying left and right, but the other authority figures keep ignoring their cries and sedating them, only further putting them in harm’s way. It’s not until Nancy steps in and begins listening to the kids that things begin to change for the better.

Slowly, as Nancy ushers in the aid of Doctor Neil Gordon, the origin story of Freddy Krueger is revealed, as the ghost of Fred’s mother, Amanda Krueger, tells of how she was kidnapped and tortured many moons ago. While she was working as a nun at the institution, Amanda was accidentally locked in with the rest of the maniacs over the holidays, and was viciously raped hundreds of times, until she was pregnant with evil himself. Upon her rescue, she gave birth to Freddy, who went on to wreak havoc and ruin countless lives, just as his fathers had before him. However, this startling revelation isn’t the only expansion that Dream Warriors adds to the franchise. Not only does the third installment offer a background for its infamous villain, but it also shows the true strength of his powers. Freddy’s been known to play with people’s dreams, and distort the R.E.M. cycle to his liking, within the parameters of a dream world, but the third film is the first time that he uses his skills on dry land, so to speak. Sure, there’s been cliffhanger endings, that leave the film open for a sequel and leave the viewers to debate what really happened, but for the most part, Freddy never displayed real power in actual reality until he exerts force at the junk yard. As he causes the cars around Neil and Nancy’s dad Donald to come to life, Freddy’s bones gather and rise, creating a walking skeleton that attacks the men, proving that he not just the ghost of a man who was burned alive, but the spirit of evil, living on long beyond the afterlife. This doesn’t just make the series more frightening again, but it also gives the franchise room to grow.

Even with these major accomplishments, Chuck Russell and Frank Darabont still aren’t done. The writing duo also use Dream Warriors to hand over the torch to a new female lead, and declare Kristen the new lead of the franchise of the house that Freddy built. With Nancy’s passing, as she dies romantically in Freddy’s arms; for they always were characteristic of dramatic lovers, Kristen is placed on the throne in her place, as Craven’s newest Scream Queen. It’s a shame that Arquette didn’t come back to revive the role in the fourth film, but Kristen lives on, regardless.

After all of the other gems that Dream Warriors offers, there’s one last theory that it subtly tosses around. Nancy tells the little warriors that they’re the last of the Elm Street children, and that’s why Freddy Krueger makes appearances in all of their dreams. Aside from the severity of their nightmares, most of the kids are dealing with their own individual problems, too. Taryn is an ex-junkie, Will is paralyzed from the waist down, and Joey hasn’t spoken in years. What if these kids all experienced a traumatizing childhood that led to their demise because their parents were part of the ones that helped to burn Fred Krueger alive years ago? Maybe the reason why Kristen’s mom drinks and brings home strange men is because she, too, can’t cope with her nightmares. She can’t forgive herself for what she’s done, and neither can the rest of the parents, and as they slowly unraveled in front of their young, the kids acted out, got in in trouble, got hurt, and wound up at the psych ward. After all, if they truly are the last of the Elm Street kids, chances are they at least know someone who has suffered in some way from the thrashings of Freddy Krueger. Either way, the message remains, year after year, brightly lit from the screen, and only growing more relevant: listen to your kids. Even if you think they’re only going through the motions of young adulthood, remember what its like to be their age, and how every breakup, every petty fight with a friend, and every night terror can feel like life and death. They may lash out, they may curse your name, but in the end, children crave attention and discipline, for it is their parents that shape them, and keep them out of the darkness, away from strange forces that seek to hurt them in the blackness of night.

giphy-2

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading