Connect with us

Editorials

[‘Jaws’ Week] Is ‘Jaws: The Revenge’ Really That Bad?

Published

on

Jaws the Revenge

Steven Spielberg’s classic film Jaws turns 40 today, you guys! To commemorate the event, we decided to take this last day of “Jaws Week” celebrate this tremendous feat for aquatic horror films (a sub-sub-genre I am a huge fan of). You read Chris Coffell’s thoughts on each film in the franchise yesterday, but I thought I would give the much-maligned Jaws: The Revenge another shot to see if it deserves all of its criticism. News flash: it does.

I don’t really know what I was expecting when I paid $3.99(!) on the PlayStation Store to rent this movie. It had been years since I’d seen it and I don’t remember it being as terrible as all the negative reviews and Razzie nominations (with only one win) suggested. Boy was I wrong. Jaws: The Revenge is a lazy, dumb and (most unforgivably) boring film that does not need to exist at all.

It’s difficult to discuss anything about Jaws: The Revenge that hasn’t already Rather than go over the issues of the film that are discussed ad nauseum (the roar of the shark, the fact that the shark has a vendetta and follows Ellen Brody to the Bahamas, etc.) and go into some of the other things that make the film so atrocious.

First of all, I would like to point out that Ellen Brody is an unstable woman, and needs to go to therapy. She is irrational and her decisions make no sense throughout the entirety of the film. There is no consistency to her character whatsoever. Also, the way she is written is kind of sexist (she only gets over her fear of the shark halfway through the movie after going on a date with Michael Caine’s Hoagie). She is given a sort of “shark sense” as well, which makes no sense. Basically, she can do exactly what Jake’s (Mario Van Peebles) tracking device can do and detect whenever the shark is attacking someone.

What is confounding about Jaws: The Revenge is that while the shark gets a lot of screen time, it doesn’t really do anything (and most of its screen time is in unnecessary dream sequences). The film can easily be divided into three parts: The first part is a drama following one woman’s grief over the loss of her son, the second part is a romantic comedy featuring Ellen and Hoagie (who spends most of the film sitting in his dinghy) and the third part is the actual “revenge” that the title refers to.

Director Joseph Sargent has stated that he wanted to make a quality film about human beings, which explains the lack of shark action and the emphasis on the romantic exploits of Ellen and Hoagie in the film. Much of Jaws: The Revenge doesn’t feel like an actual Jaws film, which is disappointing. Michael’s wife is also one of the strangest characters the series has ever seen, constantly having sex with Michael (seriously, that’s what she does during most of her screen time) and discussing it with Ellen.

Oh God, the dialogue. It’s the textbook definition of cringeworthy. There’s a moment where Michael and his wife are having a fight while she holds a blowtorch and he actually says (I swear I’m not making this up): “I’ve always wanted to make love to an angry welder. I’ve dreamed of nothing else since I was a small boy.” What. The. Fuck. Also, in the climax of the film, Michael asks his mother why she went after the shark. Her response? “I had to do it! There was nothing else to do!” Um, how about you just don’t go in the water? Which is what you have been telling everyone to do for the whole film. On his dancing date with Ellen, Hoagie states that he has two right feet. Ellen’s response? That it’s alright, because she has two left ones. Ugh.

The body count in the film is surprisingly low. Only two people get killed by the shark (three, if you count Jake’s death in the theatrical version of the film, which I don’t). The character motivations also don’t make much sense. The film seems to completely ignore Jaws 2 and 3, since Michael is still totally cool with going in the water, despite facing a great white shark 3 times before (there needs to be a happy medium between Michael’s and Ellen’s reactions to their pasts).

There are several instances where people know the shark is in the water, yet they insist on practically hanging over the edge of the boat (looking at you Sean). There’s a moment towards the end of the film where Hoagie lands his plane in the water so he, Michael and Jake can swim to the boat. Ellen goesThe list goes on and none of it makes any sense.

Anyway, this is my long harangue on Jaws: The Revenge. As many of you know, I can sometimes be too kind to bad movies, but there’s really no defending this one. It’s not even entertaining to watch. Being boring is the film’s biggest crime (and it commits many). What do you think of the film? Do you actually enjoy it? I confess, out of all the sequels, I have an unabashed love for Jaws 2, and I legitimately think it’s a good film. To celebrate the 40th Anniversary of Jaws, let’s discuss the franchise’s up(s) and downs in the comments below!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

‘Malevolence’: The Overlooked Mid-2000s Love Letter to John Carpenter’s ‘Halloween’

Published

on

Written and Directed by Stevan Mena on a budget of around $200,000, Malevolence was only released in ten theaters after it was purchased by Anchor Bay and released direct-to-DVD like so many other indie horrors. This one has many of the same pratfalls as its bargain bin brethren, which have probably helped to keep it hidden all these years. But it also has some unforgettable moments that will make horror fans (especially fans of the original Halloween) smile and point at the TV like Leonardo DiCaprio in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

Malevolence is the story of a silent and masked killer told through the lens of a group of bank robbers hiding out after a score. The bank robbery is only experienced audibly from the outside of the bank, but whether the film has the budgetary means to handle this portion well or not, the idea of mixing a bank robbery tale into a masked slasher movie is a strong one.

Of course, the bank robbery goes wrong and the crew is split up. Once the table is fully set, we have three bank robbers, an innocent mom and her young daughter as hostages, and a masked man lurking in the shadows who looks like a mix between baghead Jason from Friday the 13th Part 2 and the killer from The Town That Dreaded Sundown. Let the slashing begin.

Many films have tried to recreate the aesthetic notes of John Carpenter’s 1978 classic Halloween, and at its best Malevolence is the equivalent of a shockingly good cover song.

Though the acting and script are at times lacking, the direction, score, and cinematography come together for little moments of old-school slasher goodness that will send tingles up your spine. It’s no Halloween, to be clear, but it does Halloween reasonably proud. The nighttime shots come lit with the same blue lighting and the musical notes of the score pop off at such specific moments, fans might find themselves laughing out loud at the absurdity of how hard the homages hit. When the killer jumps into frame, accompanied by the aforementioned musical notes, he does so sharply and with the same slow intensity as Michael Myers. Other films in the subgenre (and even a few in the Halloween franchise) will tell you this isn’t an easy thing to duplicate.

The production and costume designs of Malevolence hint at love letters to other classic horror films as well. The country location not only provides for an opening Halloween IV fans will appreciate but the abandoned meat plant and the furnishings inside make for some great callbacks to 1974’s The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. All of this is buoyed and accentuated by cinematography that you rarely see in today’s low-budget films. The film is shot on 35mm film by A&E documentary filmmaker Tsuyoshi Kimono, who gives Malevolence an old-school, grainy, 1970s aesthetic that feels completely natural and not like a cheap gimmick.

Malevolence is a movie that no doubt has some glaring imperfections but it is also a movie that is peppered with moments of potential. There’s a reason they made a follow-up prequel titled Malevolence 2: Bereavement years later (and another after that) that starred both Michael Biehn and Alexandra Daddario! That film tells the origin story of our baghead, Martin Bristol. Something the first film touches on a little bit, at least enough to give you the gist of what happened here. Long story short, a six-year-old boy was kidnapped by a serial killer and for years forced to watch him hunt, torture, and kill his victims. Which brings me to another fascinating aspect of Malevolence. The ending. SPOILER WARNING.

After the mother and child are saved from the killer, our slasher is gone, his bloody mask left on the floor. The camera pans around different areas of the town, showing all the places he may be lurking. If you’re down with the fact that it’s pretty obvious this is all an intentional love letter and not a bad rip-off, it’s pretty fun. Where Malevolence makes its own mark is in the true crime moments to follow. Law enforcement officers pull up to the plant and uncover a multitude of horrors. They find the notebooks of the original killer, which explain that he kidnapped the boy, taught him how to hunt, and was now being hunted by him. This also happened to be his final entry. We discover a hauntingly long line of bodies covered in white sheets: the bodies of the many missing persons the town had for years been searching for. And there are a whole lot of them. This moment really adds a cool layer of serial killer creepiness to the film.

Ultimately, Malevolence is a low-budget movie with some obvious deficiencies on full display. Enough of them that I can imagine many viewers giving up on the film before they get to what makes it so special, which probably explains how it has gone so far under the radar all these years. But the film is a wonderful ode to slashers that have come before it and still finds a way to bring an originality of its own by tying a bank robbery story into a slasher affair. Give Malevolence a chance the next time you’re in the mood for a nice little old school slasher movie.

Malevolence is now streaming on Tubi and Peacock.

Continue Reading