Connect with us

Editorials

Happy 40th Anniversary to David Cronenberg’s ‘Shivers!’

Published

on

October 10th marked the 40th anniversary of Shivers (also known as They Came From Within), David Cronenberg’s classic body snatcher film. Shivers was Cronenberg’s first feature film (he had previously directed two short films), but it’s remarkable solid for such a relatively new director. While it isn’t known as one of Cronenberg’s best films, it has stood the test of time and remains a remarkably creepy (and gross) little movie.

***SPOILERS of a 40-year-old film to follow***

The films takes place in a Montreal apartment block as a scientist develops a parasite that causes uncontrollable sexual desire in its host and can only be spread through sexual contact. His reasoning for this isn’t exactly convincing (he thinks humanity has lost touch with its primal instincts), but nevertheless he implants the parasite into his teenaged mistress, who just so happens to be the complex slut. She sleeps with many people and parasite begins to spread among the residents of the apartment block.

Surprisingly for Cronenberg, Shivers suggests a lot of graphic violence but doesn’t show a lot of it. For example, when the scientist cuts open his mistress’s stomach and pours acid in it to dissolve the parasites before slitting his own throat, the audience doesn’t really get to see it. We know it’s happening though, and it makes the sequence all the more frightening.

Shivers went on to inspire countless films, including James Gunn’s brilliant horror-comedy Slither with its bathtub scene (featuring scream queen Barbara Steele):

Acting as a metaphor for the downfall of society, Shivers brings to mind the new Ben Wheatley (Kill List) film High-Rise, which also juxtaposes the crumbling of a microcosm inside an apartment building (I hated the film, Kalyn liked it). Whereas Wheatley’s film (and the novel it’s based on) take a satirical approach to the subject matter, Cronenberg goes for abject terror.

Normal life is lampooned (and exaggerated) through the boring, stuffy white collar residents of the apartment block that make up most of its population. It isn’t until they become infected that they are able to let loose and partake in their carnal desires. Weirdly enough, Cronenberg said that he related to the residents more after they had become infected. Cronenberg must have though Canada was having issues with sexual repression in the 70s.

While Shivers is first and foremost a horror film, it has plenty of moments of dark humor as well. Whether this is intentional, I cannot say, but it’s difficult to view the below scene and not find it kind of funny.

Finally, you’ve got the climax in the swimming pool. Arguably one of the most disturbing scenes in horror cinema, lead character Roger St. Luc (Paul Hampton) is the only uninfected person left in the building. He makes his way to the swimming pool, where is is surrounded by the other residents and is eventually infected in a mass orgy. The final shot of the film shows all of the infected residents making their way to their cars to infect other people and take over the world.

In terms of bleak endings, Shivers really takes the cake, and the orgy in the swimming pool is a truly haunting image. There aren’t many films that can say the world ended because of a mass orgy. Interestingly enough, Shivers was was partially financed by the taxpayer-funded Canadian Film Development Corporation. Journalist Robert Fulford felt the good people of Canada should know what they paid for. He wrote a scathing review of the film, stating it was “the most repulsive movie he had ever seen” (due in large part to the film’s reliance on sexual themes and imagery), but ironically this only made more people want to see the film, and it became a box office success. A mildly positive review from Roger Ebert didn’t hurt either.

Shivers is a fantastic film, and it’s hard to believe its already turning 40! If you’ve never had a chance to see Cronenberg’s first film, definitely seek this one out. It has that 70s porno vibe to it, which is part of its charm, and it will undoubtedly get under your skin. That may be a cliché phrase, but there isn’t a film more apt to use it on than Cronenberg’s Shivers.

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading