Connect with us

Editorials

In Defense of ‘Dead Silence’ (2007)

Published

on

With Halloween right around the corner, I have, like many of you, been watching a ton of horror movies. Admittedly, it’s not like I’m watching any more than I was before the Halloween season but there is a certain special feeling when horror movies and this season coincide.

While I love horror movies of all different subgenres, I find that the ones I pull out this time of the year are the ones that ooze with atmosphere, the ones that make me feel uncomfortable just because of the setting it takes place in. And one such movie that fits that need plus more is James Wan’s 2007 supernatural horror film Dead Silence.

This film seems to be quite polarizing. There are some who absolutely love it and there are those who cannot stand it. I’m not sure why the latter has that opinion because I think this movie is incredibly well done and very entertaining with its fair share of scares.

Okay, let me try to convince the naysayers, shall I?

First, let’s admire that this is the movie that James Wan directed after 2004’s Saw. He stuck to the horror genre but went a completely different route. While Saw falls under that terrible “torture porn” title, Dead Silence couldn’t be more different, having more in common with the Hammer films of old than with anything modern. For me, this really showed that Wan was a true horror fan, someone that understood the many ways in which he could scare an audience. Saw was something that horrified me because, although almost certainly unlikely, there was this strange idea that it could happen. That thought alone is terrifying. But Dead Silence can’t happen and we know that while watching it. But that doesn’t mean I was any less spooked.

The story itself is wickedly entertaining. It’s essentially taking a campfire ghost story and expanding it into a feature length movie, which is something many horror films don’t do. It kept the story simple and easy to follow while adding fun elements every so often, keeping us locked on the trail like Hansel and Gretyl’s breadcrumbs.

And to get us hooked into the story? How about that fantastic intro scene? In less than 13 minutes, the story throws us enough to make us want answers just as much as Jamie, who begins his investigation into the murder of his wife Lisa. We all know the importance of a good intro to a horror movie (just look at Scream) and, in my opinion, Dead Silence ranks as one of best.

deadsilenceanim1

I always wondered if this film was born out of the love of Billy, the puppet from Saw. After all, it was such a popular icon after the release of the film that I find myself being curious if Mary Shaw’s doll collection didn’t spring up from that fascination. Whether it did or didn’t, it’s a great way to add some terror to the screen because it seems many audiences absolutely hate the idea of dolls coming to life.

Remember how I said that this movie oozed atmosphere? I wasn’t lying. Edward Ashen’s mansion. Mary Shaw’s theater. Dr. Walker’s funeral parlor. Each of these locations felt so delightfully eldritch, so perversely sinister that I couldn’t take my eyes from the screen. And Charlie Clouser’s score only helped lock in that sensation, his aural presence weaving its way throughout the miasma.

I’m not going to say this movie is flawless. Some of the acting leaves a bit to be desired and the end twist is kinda unnecessary. Additionally, this is one of those rare situations where the director’s cut, in my opinion, does more harm than good. Some of the added elements could really stand to have been kept out.

That being said, the pros far outweigh the cons when it comes to Dead Silence. If it’s been a while since you’ve seen it or you haven’t seen it at all, definitely give this movie a shot. It’s one that I’ll happily pop on at any opportunity and I think it deserves all the love it can get. Just don’t scream…

deadsilenceanim2

Managing editor/music guy/social media fella of Bloody-Disgusting

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading