Connect with us

Editorials

Here’s How To Bring ‘Jaws’ Back and Make Fans Happy

Published

on

Whether you loved it (like me) or hated it (like someone who’s not me), one thing you should at least appreciate about The Shallows is that it’s one of the very few serious shark movies to come along in the past several decades. Save for so few notable exceptions that I can count them on one hand, minus a couple fingers, post-Jaws shark flicks have been laughably bad and over-the-top silly, often quite intentionally. But with his latest film, Jaume Collet-Serra admirably does a whole lot of course correction for the sub-genre that began with, and was totally defined by, Spielberg’s legendary classic.

The surprising box office success of The Shallows certainly seems to prove that audiences are hungry for shark cinema that packs a bite, especially when it’s smartly timed to the start of Discovery’s hugely popular Shark Week, and I can’t help but wonder if we may have a new annual tradition on our hands. Will Collet-Serra’s horror hit lead to a resurgence of sharksploitation films? More importantly, has the groundwork just been laid for the inevitable return of the long-dead Jaws franchise?

Given how dominated the current summer landscape is by reboots and sequels to beloved properties, it’s surprising that Jaws, the film that essentially coined the term “summer blockbuster,” has managed to avoid the remake chopping block these past 40 years. The franchise last swam its way onto the big screen with series-killer Jaws: The Revenge back in 1987, and in the past thirty years, not a peep has been heard from it. You won’t find me complaining about that, but if you know how Hollywood works, you’ve probably realized by now that it won’t be much longer before Jaws surfaces from the deep.

The smartest way to bring Jaws back? It’s damn sure not with a remake.

While watching The Shallows, I was struck with the feeling that I was watching a Jaws movie that wasn’t marketed as a Jaws movie. In other words, if it was re-branded in post-production and released into theaters as Jaws: The Shallows, I’m not sure anyone would’ve bat an eye or cried foul. And I believe that therein lies the key to bringing Jaws back to life in a way that fans will actually be on board with.

[Related] We Need More Killer Shark Movies

Earlier this year, 10 Cloverfield Lane brilliantly pushed the boundaries of franchise cinema and in many ways shattered all the molds, showing that the future of movie franchises may very well be much broader “cinematic universes.” The J.J. Abrams-produced film, which began its life as a standalone indie movie titled The Cellar, didn’t actually have much of anything to do with the found footage flick Cloverfield, but tethering it to the franchise proved to be a smart way to both get asses in the seats and give fans of the 2008 film something different yet something part of that same universe.

Which reminds me of something.

If John Carpenter had his way, the Halloween franchise would’ve ditched the Michael Myers story post-Halloween 2 and instead been used as an umbrella under which to tell stories that shared nothing in common aside from all being set on Halloween night, and he was pretty far ahead of his time in thinking that way. What he hoped to create was what we’d now call the Halloween Cinematic Universe, and it’s still kind of a bummer that it didn’t work out. But fans today, as evidenced by the success of 10 Cloverfield Lane and the years-later appreciation of Halloween 3, seem much more willing to accept that anthology approach to franchise cinema. And Jaws may be the perfect candidate to test those waters.

Rather than foolishly attempt to remake Spielberg’s original or somehow try to continue the Brody family’s increasingly strange and utterly nonsensical saga, it’d probably be much smarter business on the part of Universal Studios to instead give rise to a “Jaws Cinematic Universe.” The franchise, for starters, allows for limitless creative freedom, as any movie released under that umbrella need only feature a killer shark in order to technically pass as a Jaws movie. Each new film could be set in a different location and feature different characters, allowing for an innovative new franchise that wouldn’t have to ever worry about continuing previous storylines or setting the stage for future installments.

If the Jaws franchise must come back, why not bring it back in the most palatable form possible? We get more original shark movies on the big screen and Universal gets to inoffensively milk a massive cash cow that they’ve refrained from touching these past three decades. Sounds to me like a win-win for all.

The Jaws Cinematic Universe. I like the sound of it.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading