Connect with us

Editorials

10 Positive Aspects of ‘Halloween: Resurrection’

Published

on

Haloween: Resurrection

Here’s a fun fact about movie critics: most of us don’t like to trash movies. We watch movies almost every day and we know how much work goes into making a film. A lot of people spend a lot of time and hard work producing a film that can be shown to the public. Critics want to see good movies. It’s never fun to tear down what could be a certain filmmaker’s dream project or criticize a certain actor’s performance when they are just trying to make a living. It is a necessary evil of the job though, and something that all of us must do when the film calls for it.

In the past I have been criticized for being too lenient with films. My reviews seem generous to some people, so much so that some readers think I’m being dishonest in my reviews or that I’m being paid to write positive things (just look at this comment on my Alien: Covenant review for a recent example). None of that is true, of course, but the accusation is still rather insulting. That being said, it takes a lot for me to truly hate a film (though you can look at my review of this year’s The Bye Bye Man for an example of that), and I always try to see the positive even in the most lackluster of films. I find that this outlook allows me to enjoy a film more, even if it’s not the best piece of filmmaking. I will identify flaws, but I will also try to find something positive to point out, because only pointing out the negative is an emotionally draining task. After all, it is very difficult to make a film with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

This brings me to Halloween: Resurrection, the eighth and final installment in the original Halloween franchise, which is celebrating(?) its 15th anniversary today. It is considered to be the worst entry in the series by most fans, and arguably, it is. The film is filled with cringe-inducing dialogue (“You like sushi, motherfucker?”), questionable narrative choices (Can you imagine seeing this in theaters in 2002 and witnessing the death of Laurie Strode? That must have been awful.) and even more questionable casting choices (Busta Rhymes, anyone?). That being said, I decided to watch the film for the first time in nearly a decade and attempt to find 10 positive things about it. It was a daunting task, because this is a truly uninspired and lazy film (which is surprising considering it was directed by Halloween II director Rick Rosenthal), but by God I was determined to see it through.

1. Jamie Lee Curtis

Admittedly, Laurie’s arc in Resurrection makes no sense. Did she go to the mental institution simply to wait Michael’s return? Why did it take Michael’s three years to track her down? How did she set up an elaborate trap on the roof of the institution? Why did she think dropping him off the roof would kill him when he was shot 6 times and dropped off a balcony in her first encounter with him? Why does she kiss Michael before she falls to her death? Why does Michael give his knife to one of the institution’s patients? There are so many questions, but at least Curtis gives it her all.

Halloween: Resurrection


2. Katee Sackhoff

Just one year before she became Starbuck on Battlestar Gallactica, Sackhoff was Jen Danzig, the wild party girl in Halloween: Resurrection. The role doesn’t ask much of Sackhoff, but she brings her usual charisma to a film sorely lacking any of its own.

Halloween: Resurrection


3. The Peeping Tom Homage

There’s not a lot of creativity in Halloween: Resurrection, but Rosenthal does know his horror movies. Charlie’s (Brad Sihvon) death is a direct homage to Michael Powell’s 1960 film Peeping Tom, right down to the use of a tripod as the murder weapon and showing the murder from the POV of the killer.


4. Bill’s Death

It doesn’t make a lot of sense that Michael jumps through a window to kill Bill (ha). Is the window part of the wall? Because it sure doesn’t look like it. Still, it’s the only effective jump scare in the film and the shot of Michael stabbing Bill’s head like a jack-o-lantern is a nice touch. Bummer that Thomas Ian Nicholas (American Pie) couldn’t land a bigger role though.

Halloween: Resurrection Bill Death


5. The “Slasher Big Brother” Concept

Setting the film in a reality show scavenger hunt is a very early 2000s thing to do, but it’s still a fun concept, even if it isn’t used to its full potential.

Halloween: Resurrection


6. Busta, Meet Michael

Their kung fu fight scene is goofy as Hell (and not in a good way), but Freddy’s first encounter with Michael is legitimately funny. Rhymes may stick out like a sore thumb in the film, but at least he gets one good scene.


7. The Use of Instant Messenger

In Halloween: Resurrection‘s one and only suspenseful scene, Michael is chasing Sara (Biana Kajlich) around his house while her chat buddy Deckard (Ryan Merriman) tells her his location via instant messenger. Again, it’s a clever concept that isn’t used to its full potential, but it’s a brief moment of inspiration.

Halloween Resurrection


8. The Final Girl Isn’t Terrible

Sara is a pretty bland character, but she does get a few good kicks in and she busts out a damn chainsaw in the film’s climax, so that’s something.


9. Michael’s Penis Gets Electrocuted

You can’t make this stuff up. Busta Rhymes actually incapacitates Michael Myers by electrocuting his nether-regions. It’s so dumb but so funny all at the same time. At this point in the movie, you’ve probably lost all hope, so this is some welcome comic relief.

Michael Myers Dick Shock


10. Some Dogs Like It.

Admittedly, it’s really difficult to come up with 10 positive things about Halloween: Resurrection. So difficult that this final entry has nothing to do with the movie itself, but I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention that one (not both) of my dogs was absolutely enthralled by the film. He couldn’t take his eyes off the damn thing (My other dog? Not so much). At least everyone who had a hand in making the film can rest easy knowing that at least one creature on this planet seemed to enjoy it.

Dogs Watching Halloween: Resurrection   Dogs Watching Halloween: Resurrection

What are your thoughts on Halloween: Resurrection?  Does it have any redeeming qualities? I admit, I choose to believe that Halloween H20 is the last entry in the original franchise. This film is a turd through and through, but it’s good for the soul to try to see the good in things.

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading