Connect with us

Editorials

Why ‘Saw III’ is the Best Sequel in the Franchise

Published

on

With Jigsaw now out in theaters, we revisit the franchise’s high point.

It could hardly be considered an exact science, but a case could be made that it’s in the third installment that a franchise is often perfected. A Nightmare on Elm Street, Paranormal Activity and Friday the 13th are all home to second sequels that are standout fan favorites, and Saw is certainly no exception to that particular theory.

Because with Saw III, the franchise was most definitely perfected.

Franchise co-creator Leigh Whannell returned to write Saw III, released in 2006 and directed by Saw II‘s Darren Lynn Bousman. It’s important to note Whannell’s involvement, because Saw III was the third and final time he was directly involved in the series’ storytelling. And it shows, as Saw III works overtime to provide franchise closure.

There are two main storylines that inevitably collide in Saw III, both of them compelling enough to elevate what many have written off as “torture porn” over the years into nothing short of a damn fine horror film that nails all the key themes and ideas that made the franchise so much more than that. In the first story, grieving father Jeff is kidnapped by Jigsaw and placed into a game where he’s forced to confront everyone who played a role in the death of his young son. They’ve all been strung up in nasty traps, and Jeff gets to decide who lives and who dies.

Elsewhere, we catch up with Lynn Denlon, a surgeon who is also kidnapped and placed into her own game. In Lynn’s game, a dying Jigsaw is confined to a bed in a makeshift, far-from-sterile hospital environment, where “student” Amanda Young is watching over him. Lynn’s task? Keep Jigsaw alive. If he dies, a collar around her neck will explode.

It’s the second story that is unquestionably the most important in Saw III. As we find out at the very end of the film (spoiler alert!), Lynn’s game was actually Amanda’s game, which is a surprise twist even to Amanda. It was Amanda who had to keep Lynn alive, and Jigsaw intentionally kept from her the important little tidbit that Jeff and Lynn are husband and wife.

Why would Jigsaw be testing Amanda *again*, after she already survived the “reverse bear trap” in the first film? Well, that’s where Saw III gets really interesting. Jigsaw *wants* Amanda to take over his work after he dies, but he’s not convinced that she’s actually capable of carrying on his cause. Amanda’s traps are designed to kill rather than teach lessons, and Jigsaw’s final test for her, before he dies, is to see if she has the will to keep a “subject” alive. As for Amanda, well, she’s got some serious demons battling inside her head.

Amanda Young, unquestionably the most interesting character in the franchise, was seemingly destined to become just that in the first Saw. Though she only makes a minor appearance in that film, it’s something she says to the police after surviving her trap that hits to the heart of everything the franchise is about.

He helped me,” she tells them, referring to Jigsaw.

Amanda is the only victim of Jigsaw’s games who has actually learned the lesson he spent the final years of his life trying to impart, finding through her near-death experience a purpose in her life for the very first time. She is incredibly important to Jigsaw, and naturally, he’s the most important person in her life. It’s this connection between the two characters that makes Saw III something of a twisted love story, as Amanda vies for Jigsaw’s attention in the presence of another woman (Lynn) who seems to be the new apple of her teacher’s eye.

This sends Amanda into a tailspin, and it becomes clear that she has a goal that’s very different from Jigsaw’s: while Jigsaw genuinely wants his subjects to survive, Amanda simply cannot deal with the idea of anyone else in the world possessing the unique gift that Jigsaw has provided her with. It’s this dynamic between the two villains that makes Saw III the most interesting film in the franchise from a storytelling standpoint, and the performances of a calm Tobin Bell and a distraught Shawnee Smith sell that dynamic beautifully.

Revisiting Saw III this week, it became clear to me that Leigh Whannell intended to use the film, again his final one in the series, to wrap up loose ends and bring all the storylines from the previous two films to a satisfying conclusion. And he does just that with his script, using Saw III to cap off what is great standalone trilogy within the franchise. In particular, Saw III deepens the character of Amanda before killing her off, returning to the events of the very first Saw movie and showing us something new: Amanda was helping Jigsaw all along.

It was Amanda, wearing that iconic pig mask, who kidnapped Dr. Gordon and Adam, and as we learned in Saw II, it was Amanda who was running that particular show with a front row seat. The first three films wonderfully build upon that story of Jigsaw and Amanda, and Saw III is the perfect conclusion to their saga together. With massive wounds to the neck, one by gunshot and one by circular saw, Jigsaw and Amanda bleed out together. It’s a tale somewhat akin to Romeo and Juliet, only 1000x more twisted, and there’s something beautiful about it all.

While all this is going on, Saw III also serves up some of the franchise’s most gruesome traps, both through flashbacks to some of Amanda’s subjects and also to Jigsaw’s final game, the latter involving Lynn’s husband, Jeff. The traps in Saw III are aggressive and hard to watch, with “The Rack” and “Pig Vat” being two particular standouts on that front.

Bottom line being, Saw III delivers on everything that made the Saw films so damn good in the franchise’s early days, telling a compelling story, nauseating us with creatively nasty traps, and hitting us with a final act twist that we genuinely didn’t see coming. In many ways, it’s the perfect Saw film, and it’s also one of the best franchise sequels of them all.

Unfortunately, there’s a downside to Saw III. After it killed off everything interesting about the story, the franchise quickly went downhill and never managed to recover.

But that original trilogy remains an incredible 3-part story of two characters: one who is searching for her own purpose, and another who is trying to give one to others.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading