Connect with us

Editorials

So Laurie is Basically Dr. Loomis in the New ‘Halloween,’ Right?

Published

on

Those of us who weren’t at CinemaCon didn’t actually *see* anything in regards to David Gordon Green’s Halloween this week, but we did learn a handful of things about this October’s sequel to the original classic. The first footage from the film was shown off at the event, which is allegedly going to be coming online within the next couple months.

So what did we learn? Things Jamie Lee Curtis said at CinemaCon, along with descriptions of the footage that flooded social media, have revealed to us the basic plot details. As we already knew, the new movie takes place 40 years after the events of the original, with all sequels retconned out of existence. Michael Myers has been locked up in an asylum for the past 40 years, and he again escapes in Gordon Green’s film. Only this time, Laurie isn’t a helpless victim for him to torment. This time, Laurie is *ready.*

As Eric Vespe wrote in his recap of the footage for Rooster Teeth, “Jamie Lee Curtis’ Laurie Strode is no damsel in distress here. In fact I don’t think there was one shot of her being afraid. Quite the opposite. She’s not only prepared for this moment (having rigged her house with various safe rooms, weapons and hidden compartments), she’s been hoping for it. At one point she even says that she prays [Michael] gets out someday so she can kill him. Laurie is hunting him just as much as he’s hunting his victims.”

One person who is very much not ready for the arrival of Michael Myers is Allyson Strode, Laurie’s granddaughter. And… hey wait a second… this all sounds *really* familiar.

The young woman in danger. The grizzled vet who’s hunting Michael. Is the new Halloween a new take on the original, with Allyson as Laurie and Laurie as Loomis?

Andi Matichak as Allyson Strode

Earlier this month, Jamie Lee Curtis spoke a bit about Halloween, noting that she had seen a trailer and it was “terrifying.” That was the obvious headline of that particular story, but Curtis also said something else in the interview…

“If I had had my druthers, I probably would’ve called it Halloween Retold. Because it’s being retold,” Curtis explained to Yahoo. “It’s the original story in many, many, many ways. Just retold 40 years later with my granddaughter.”

That wasn’t the first time Curtis had referred to David Gordon Green’s Halloween as something of a retelling of John Carpenter’s, so we kind of figured that Laurie’s granddaughter would essentially be playing the role of a new Laurie. But it wasn’t until CinemaCon earlier this week that it became pretty clear what Laurie’s role in all of this is.

At CinemaCon, Jamie Lee Curtis described the film as “old school meets new school with Laurie at the center of it… who has turned into a warrior.”

She added that Laurie is “determined to keep Michael locked up forever.”

Add to all of this that we know Laurie wields a .357 magnum in the new film, the same type of gun Dr. Loomis used throughout the original franchise, and it doesn’t require a rocket scientist to ascertain that Gordon Green’s Halloween is indeed a “retelling” of the original movie, only 40 years later and with some roles cleverly reversed.

Laurie Strode has become Dr. Loomis, so to speak. And 40 years after Michael Myers killed her friends and altered the course of her life, she’s fighting back to save a young girl who’s being pursued by Michael Myers on a Halloween night in Haddonfield.

It all just seems so right, doesn’t it?

Halloween 2018 teaser poster Blumhouse

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading