Connect with us

Editorials

[Editorial] The Musicality of Rob Zombie’s Films, From ‘House of 1000 Corpses’ to ’31’

Published

on

The influence of horror in Rob Zombie‘s musical endeavors is unmistakable. From homages to German expressionism in Living Dead Girl to The Munsters references in Dragula (not to mention the band name White Zombie, itself borrowed from the homonymous 1933 classic), it was quite clear that the man was a spooky cinephile long before he directed his first film.

While Zombie’s movies eventually turned him into the cinematic equivalent of a rock star even among folks who don’t enjoy heavy metal (after all, he only became one of my favorite musicians after he was already one of my favorite filmmakers), little has been said about the influence that music had on the stories he decided to put on film, and I think that’s worth looking into. Zombie’s filmography has often been criticized for being repetitive, almost always relying on the same “Hellbilly” aesthetic that his solo career is known for, but at this point, I believe it’s more of a personal style than an artistic crutch (and I’m not the only one, with even Stephen King insinuating that Zombie did the faux-70s shtick better than Tarantino).

Born in 1965, Zombie’s infatuation with the strange and macabre began almost immediately. His parents worked at a carnival, and even after settling down in Massachusetts, young Rob would attempt to stave off boredom by consuming copious amounts of television. This led to an infatuation with late night monster movies, rock music and the cultural zeitgeist of the 1970s. Everything from New Hollywood to serial killers and our morbid fascination with their murderous exploits would eventually become inspiration for Zombie’s music.

It’s not surprising that these ideas would reoccur in his films, the first of which would be the infamous House of 1000 Corpses, released in 2003. The film shares a name with a song from 2001, and both deal with a creepy house inhabited by murderous members of a sadistic family. While it may initially seem that the movie is based on Zombie’s song, the film was actually completed in 2000, having been shelved for three years due to its questionable content. Zombie actually states that the idea for the story came to him after working on a Halloween attraction that would later be revised into The American Nightmare.

Rather than the film having inspired the song, however, it’s more than likely that both just share a common origin in Zombie’s lifelong fascination with these monstrous characters that inflict so much suffering on others but are still somehow so compelling. Fittingly enough, the original song actually features samples from Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS, and is also used in the film’s soundtrack, blending rather nicely with the movie’s score, also composed by Zombie. In fact, some scenes feel like prolonged music videos (which makes sense, considering how Zombie began his directing career with music videos), though the experimental editing wouldn’t look out of place in an actual 70s production.

At this point, it was clear that Zombie’s approach to filmmaking was similar to his approach to music. His work can be loud and crude, but he’s got something to say, and by God, he’s gonna make you see/hear it on his terms. Whether you like this style or not, it takes a lot of guts to make movies this way.

Zombie would later revisit the idea of a murderous family unit (almost certainly inspired by his interest in the Manson Family affair) in the long-awaited sequel, The Devil’s Rejects. Here, Zombie would continue his exploration of just how far these characters could go without making us hate them, and this sympathetic view of horrifying figures would become a recurring theme throughout nearly all of his work.

This film would also be accompanied by a homonymous single, though this one is much vaguer, literally dealing with deranged individuals deemed too evil even for hell. Nevertheless, the song doesn’t even play during the film (it’s not even featured on the soundtrack), as this movie’s influences are much closer to latter-day westerns and road movies than the slashers and monster flicks that inspired its prequel and much of Zombie’s musical work.

In general, The Devil’s Rejects’ soundtrack feels a lot like a love-letter to classic Americana, featuring heavy doses of Terry Reid, Joe Walsh and, of course, Lynyrd Skynyrd, in an attempt to match the Western-esque imagery. Naturally, the Freebird montage as the Firefly family faces the music (pun very much intended) is one of the film’s most memorable scenes, though it does spark a trend in Zombie’s filmography, as he’d develop a habit of ending his movies on an emotionally-charged moment accompanied by an iconic tune from the 70s.

That being said, a lot of people miss the fact that the movie means to question the celebration of the American Outlaw, and not necessarily contribute to it. Zombie’s attempts at humanizing Michael Myers in his Halloween remake and sequel seem to be an extension of this idea. Once again, these films don’t feature much of Zombie’s own tunes, instead continuing to rely on an oldies marathon, featuring classics like Nazareth’s Love Hurts and Alice Cooper’s Only Women Bleed, fitting in with the movie’s overall themes. Strangely enough, the same attention to detail doesn’t quite extend to John Carpenter’s musical cues, which frequently end up misused; and they’re almost entirely absent from the sequel.

Around the same time as Halloween II, Zombie also released The Haunted World of El Superbeasto, an animated adaptation of his comic-book series of the same name. Of course, the protagonist’s name was lifted from Zombie’s insanely popular single Superbeast, and the song’s music video also featured a robot remarkably similar to Murray, another character within the film. While this animated venture had a lukewarm reception, it also comes the closest to capturing the spirit of Zombie’s musical career. Featuring countless references to classic horror and a plethora of cameos, this Haunted World ends up feeling very much alive as a commemoration of rock and schlock. The movie also benefits from a hilarious soundtrack, though most of the original songs were written and performed by the comedy band Hard ‘n Phirm instead of Zombie.

We’d only see Zombie’s work on the big screen again in 2012, with the release of The Lords of Salem, a film that literally uses the eldritch power of music as a plot point. While the film’s name is derived from a 2006 track meant as a spiritual sequel to a previous single, American Witch, the connection between the film and song is mostly thematic, and the song once again isn’t featured on the film’s soundtrack.

Nevertheless, this is Zombie’s most serious exploration of music in film so far, with the story revolving around a DJ that becomes involved in a Satanic conspiracy after playing a cursed record. Lords of Salem is a surprising shift in tone when compared to Zombie’s previous work, and the unique soundtrack reflects this as well. Not only was the eerie score composed by Rob’s guitarist John 5, but the film also features heavy usage of The Velvet Underground & Nico’s hauntingly beautiful All Tomorrow’s Parties.

As a whole, Lords of Salem even resembles an ambient album in its structure and atmosphere, which might be why it’s a love-it-or-hate-it kind of movie. Even so, Zombie’s next film would be even more divisive, feeling like a best-of compilation, rehashing some of the director’s greatest hits instead of presenting us with something new. After a few years digesting the film, I actually enjoy 31 a lot more now, but it still pales in comparison to the director’s previous work.

The 70’s grindhouse aesthetic is still fun, if expected by now, and so is the accompanying jukebox soundtrack. The highlight of the film, however, lies in the ending, which, ironically, features both the best and worst of Zombie’s filmmaking talents and vices. Aerosmith’s Dream On builds to a crescendo just as you thought the coast was clear on deserted road, and then spoilers ensue. I’m still not sure if the rest of the film deserves such a powerful final scene, but I’m glad it’s there, as it reminds us that even Zombie’s lesser attempts at storytelling still have merit.

With that in mind (not to mention Three From Hell looming on the horizon), I’m excited to see (and hear) what Rob Zombie has in store for us during the next stage of his heavy metal filmmaking career. In the past, he’s said that he hopes that every one of his films features at least one song that you can never hear the same way again after experiencing it in the movie, and I think it’s safe to say that, for better or worse, he’s kept that promise so far.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading