Connect with us

Editorials

[Editorial] How the Theatrical Horror of 2009 Made Me a Hardcore Horror Fan

Published

on

It all started with Prom Night. It was 2008, I was thirteen, and I’d been invited to go see this new horror movie with a group of girls I didn’t know very well, but whom I had become pretty friendly with since starting middle school just a few months prior. I didn’t yet have many friends at the time, and this would not only be one of my first hangouts with new people, but it would be the first horror movie I’d ever watched in my entire life.

I remember that before I got to the theater that night, I did hold onto an initial apprehension – an uneasiness built from years of fearing the front covers of scary DVDs while perusing Hollywood Video with my dad – but which dissipated as soon as we entered our screening. This was because the theater was packed, to a point that I don’t think I’ve seen recreated since – or maybe it has been, but that feeling certainly never was.

It was an introduction to the communal shrieks, gasps, laughter and then sighs of relief that come with a full house horror screening, and which were punctuated by my own feelings of unity with my friends, with the other theater-goers, and the experience itself. It’s a memory that I’ve held onto all these years later, still so sharp in my mind that I can see exactly where we sat in the theater, and the angle from which we watched teenage blood drip from the screen.

Though 2009, an entire decade ago (and a horrifying reminder that it’s been ten whole years since I was fourteen), found most of its influential flourish in now-horror classics such as Zombieland, Antichrist, Drag Me to Hell and even The Human Centipede, I remember the year a little differently.

Orphan

The horror renaissance of my 2009 kicked off with the Friday the 13th remake and lasted throughout the year, finishing off with the alien found footage film The Fourth Kind and leading to a lifelong genre devotion. When I think of 2009, I think of the goofy dybbuk horror The Unborn, the possession horror The Haunting in Connecticut, the evil child thriller Orphan, and the mixed bag American remake of the Korean film A Tale of Two Sisters, The Uninvited – films that seem to have fallen off the face of horror discourse forever. But they each left a lasting and unshakable impression on me.

A year or so after my Prom Night experience, I had heard through the public school grapevine that the theater in our hometown that sold conveniently cheaper tickets compared to the local AMC also sold them to unaccompanied minors looking to watch an R-rated film. So, my friends and I made our plans to see the new reboot of the classic slasher Friday the 13th, while I went and lined up our showing with an age-appropriate film playing around the same time. A deviously seamless technique I would employ for any and all R-rated films until I turned eighteen, I would tell my parents that the latter film was the one I was attending. They still don’t know that I did that.

Friday the 13th

Thus, if the unsuccessful 2008 remake of the horror classic Prom Night was the catalyst to desire, then that Friday the 13th revival was the ensuing chemical reaction. With no easy access to, nor slightest interest in the violent artistry of Lars von Trier, the trash horror to grace suburban cinemas was my teenage entryway into the entire genre. And while a PG-13 rating is frequently looked down on in the horror community, in comparison to the bloody opportunities available when rated R, there is still something to be said for its impact. If you aren’t so lucky as to be gifted with a theater that doesn’t think twice about letting a group of fourteen-year-olds into a remake of The Last House on the Left, PG-13 horror films can be an accessible opportunity for kids with a curiosity about the genre.

I’d be lying if I told you I could recollect what any of these movies I’ve mentioned are about. I am constantly misremembering The Unborn as having starred Megan Fox (that was Jennifer’s Body, also a 2009 film), and though Orphan was a film that seemed to light up giddy conversations in the halls of my high school due to an uncomfortable scene coinciding with the film’s big reveal, you’d be hard pressed to get any synopsis out of me. The Fourth Kind’s only mark in my memory is not of the purportedly “real” footage of alien existence, but of the closing credits, during which supposed real-life narration is used in place of music. It includes a line that my friends and I swore said “My daughter is seven and she saw a square!” – which underscored inside jokes between us for months. But I digress.

When I look back at the horror films of 2009, I somehow can’t remember when I went to see Zombieland. But I can remember when I saw The Uninvited and guffawed at its uninteresting plot twist while third-wheeling with my friend and her boyfriend. I remember going to the theater, and going consistently – constantly intrigued by the promise of a new horror film and not once being discouraged by the disappointing end product. I always wanted to watch another one of these films, and I always wanted to come back. Though the content didn’t leave much of a mark, it was the experience of being in the theater, being with my friends, and being exposed to the genre itself. I knew I wanted more, and I wanted better. I wanted something to scare me.

The Haunting in Connecticut

The horror of 2009 was, for me, an understated teenage goldmine – seemingly forgotten in the eyes of tastemakers, but influential to those of us just entering puberty and bored on a Friday night. My friends and I would always find ourselves intrigued by the potential of an adrenaline rush from something spooky called The Haunting in Connecticut, complete with a convenient 7:00 PM showing so that we didn’t have to miss dinner with our parents. But the things that teenagers enjoy often end up overlooked, in favor of what’s considered “true quality.”

And to an extent, that’s not entirely false. Back then, my friends and I would go see almost anything just to spend time with one another. There was no counter on caliber; we didn’t give a shit about Paul Thomas Anderson. We’d get to the theater a little early or stay a little late, just to hang out in the back by the stairs leading up to the projection room, taking goofy pictures of ourselves striking weird poses with our Canon cameras, during a time when iPhones were only just being conceptualized. But more often than not, we’d eventually find ourselves sitting in the very last row in the screening of a B-rate horror film.

When I look back on it now, I feel thankful that we did.

The Uninvited

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading