Connect with us

Editorials

Before ‘Hereditary’ and ‘Midsommar,’ Ari Aster Directed These Six Short Films With Similar Themes

Published

on

In preparation for Ari Aster’s Midsommar, here’s a look into his collection of short films that hint at the horror filmmaker he has become.

With first Hereditary and now Midsommar under his belt, Ari Aster has not just established himself as an important new filmmaker, but an exciting, fresh voice in horror. Aster currently fully embraces the horror genre in his feature films, but his shorts, while playing with many of the same themes and ideas, are much less overt examples of horror; though they’re still likely to disturb you.

Ari Aster honed his skills at the AFI Conservatory, where he’d also go on to build relationships with many of the people he’s still working with today, like cinematographer Pawel Pogorzelski. Before Hereditary hit in 2018, Aster directed six short films between 2011 and 2016. Both Aster’s features and his shorts dig into the most devastating varieties of psychological and emotional horror. They excel in storytelling that’s born out of discomfort and makes you deal with stuff that you don’t want to acknowledge. It’s easy to picture how Hereditary or Midsommar could be broken down into a series of shorter films that explore the same ideas, based on the quality and subject matter that these short films tackle. There’s also a very real sense of humor that courses through all of these uncomfortable shorts, which does provide a degree of levity that’s certainly absent in Hereditary.

With Midsommar now disturbing people in theaters, here’s a primer on Aster’s short films and how they reflect the larger themes of his features.


It’s only fitting that The Strange Thing About the Johnsons is Ari Aster’s first short film (as well as his longest), as it introduces so many of the themes that pop up in Hereditary and Midsommar. It plays with the familiar territory of a typical family that’s on the verge of imploding from a major traumatic secret that they’re hiding. The Strange Thing About the Johnsons relishes the first moment where you truly realize the degree of horrors that are going on here and it’s an unexpected twist on incest and hierarchy that drags this family down to even darker places. Idyllic dinners and family portraits are juxtaposed to vicious rape scenes and emotional breakdowns. The confrontation scene that happens between father and son is absolutely chilling and a fine example in how Aster would have a true gift for creating tense, frightening situations. The way in which the camera freely floats or lingers also reflects a level of freedom that the family themselves are not capable of achieving.

The Strange Thing About The Johnsons looks at simply how hard it can be for people to just act normal. Any moment of uncertainty slowly decays into anxiety. It’s about how the quiet silences are sometimes more telling than a shouting match. The short film is an exercise in repression and endurance as we watch this family get pushed to their limits and witness the emotional damage that this secret does to all of them. The cast here shows just as many scars and as much pain as any of the performers from Aster’s features as they try to hold their “normal” family together.


Aster’s next short kicks off with the cursory information that it remains paramount that the titular Beau does not fall asleep. Even if this detail is tangential to the actual premise of the short, it quickly puts the viewer at unease. The short chronicles the simple attempts of a tense, paranoid man, as he fears over the security of his apartment and his safety. It’s a remarkably eerie, stressful six minutes and it’s one of Aster’s shorts that’s shot and plays the most like a horror film. Even if the events in the short are highly unremarkable and even often comical (the short can actually be found on Funny or Die), they’re filtered through Beau’s confusion and fear and depict how someone’s perception of events can turn any day into a horror film. There’s even a Home Alone-esque mentality in play as Beau tries to cope with the fact that someone else has the keys to his apartment and that he might be in danger.


Perhaps the biggest stylistic deviation out of Aster’s shorts, Munchausen strips the writer/director of his honest, pained verbosity and instead opts for a story that lets its imagery, expressions, and music (seriously, the score here is incredible) do the heavy lifting. Munchausen plays out like a haunted fairy tale and explores the sad, believable story of a mom’s struggle with her son’s journey off to college. Munchausen chronicles the mother’s misguided efforts to keep her son from leaving her and while the lack of dialogue, melancholy score, warm lighting, and even the cheerful cross-stitched title card paint a comforting image, there’s a devastating, broken story underneath. Munchausen begins with such vibrancy and optimism. It shows the beauty of freedom and what’s possible for young adults who have their whole lives ahead of them, which makes its progression all the more gutting. It’s like Todd Solondz or Lars Von Trier is directing a Wes Anderson movie.

Munchausen is a great example in minimalist storytelling and trusting in the power of your images. There’s some incredible editing and use of match cuts here to cover things like time lapses, too. The relationship that the mother (Bonnie Bedelia, in one of her most shocking and powerful roles) shares with her son, is almost the inverse of what’s present in Hereditary, although it’s formed through the same level of heartbreak. It’s the most brutal of Aster’s stories and focuses on the problems at home that we want to pretend don’t exist.


Basically, along with C’est La Vie, can both be grouped together into a collection that Aster refers to as his Portrait Series. At the New York Film Festival, Aster originally described his Portrait Series as a proposed 12-part anthology that “can be seen as a panoramic portrait of Los Angeles.” The shorts in this series are unrelenting character studies that dig deep into who people are in unconventional, fourth-wall breaking ways that not only highlight Aster’s skills as a filmmaker, but also as someone who approaches his work from a character place first. This is where his horror comes from.

Basically stars Rachel Brosnahan (who kills it here) as spoiled LA socialite, Shandy Pickles, who seemingly has a perfect life full of charms, but finds it all unraveling underneath the seams. Ambitiously, Basically tries to answer the question of why people perform and what they’re looking for in a world full of pretend. There’s a very surreal, abstract quality to how Shandy’s life is presented as she cynically scattershot criticizes those around her and fails to internalize her own advice. It’s a perfect individual snapshot of the self-doubt that fuels the entertainment industry. Both Hereditary and Midsommar heavily deal with the dysfunction that bubbles under an idyllic nature and that’s absolutely Basically’s agenda. It shows that even those that have it all are still susceptible to the chaotic whims of the universe and that they may actually be supporting players in someone else’s story.

There’s such brilliant shot composition on display here as we flow through Shandy’s free-floating monologue. It’s staggering how much Basically communicates about Brosnahan’s Shandy Pickles in its 15 minutes and it’s easy to see how these intensive character exercises have evolved into the layered characters in Aster’s feature film work. Shandy puts up such a guard through the bulk of the short as she dashes through her life’s story, but when she finally shows vulnerability and how broken she is towards the end, it works. There is a real person there. Basically excels at showing the cracks in a perfect life and how once you start seeing them, you can’t stop.


The Turtle’s Head is really something else and it nails that aspect that Aster is so good at where a narrative veers hard in an unexpected direction and you realize that you’re in a very different story or playing a role contrary to what you thought. The Turtle’s Head begins as a chauvinistic detective story, complete with hyperbolized voiceover, and it really plays into the hardboiled noir genre with its use of music, cinematography, telegraphed clues, and even its typography choices. The Turtle’s Head commits, which is why it’s so effective and startling when it quickly shifts into a haunting slice of body horror. Suddenly all of the tools of power and aggression that the protagonist wields disappear, right when he realizes that his penis is beginning to irrationally shrink. The complex mystery is merely the framing device that delivers Detective Bing Shooster’s existential dread and is relegated to the background once his crisis begins. It’s again impressive to see how much Aster can accomplish with a scant runtime that’s barely over ten minutes.

The “twist” of this short may sound humorous, but Aster lingers on the image of these grotesque, shrinking genitals for much longer than is necessary, all for the explicit purpose to make you uncomfortable and force you to deal with this horror in the same way that Detective Bing Shooster must. This is the most overtly humorous of Aster’s shorts, but it’s amazing how a story can shift so greatly in tone, simply by showing what it’s talking about. That’s what gives The Turtle’s Head such great power. You don’t want to acknowledge this is reality, but Aster forces you to.


C’est La Vie is a story that’s told through the questionable perspective of a homeless drug addict. It acts as this colossal takedown on society, consumerism, and how nobody sets out to be homeless, but they end up that way after they’ve been chewed up and spit out. C’est La Vie almost feels like a VICE PSA for homelessness and drug addiction. It’s an impressive film about how far man can plummet, but the only real horror here is in the darkness of humanity. What’s beautiful here is while Chester Crummings, the homeless man, condemns humanity and society, he’s shown to be no better. He preaches while he simultaneously victimizes. He murders a family through a home invasion and then screams, “And don’t even get me started on AIDS.” The whole piece tows the line of verging into parody, but it’s a strong summation of not only the duplicitous state of America, but also the traditional family or relationship that resides within it, which Aster is so fascinated in.

C’est La Vie gets progressively darker and more intense through its brief seven minutes, almost like you’re falling into filth with this narrator. It’s the most similar in tone to Basically, the other fast-paced, densely edited entry in Aster’s Portrait Series, with both shorts comprised of the same DNA; albeit looking at people at opposite ends of the spectrum.

Finally, C’est La Vie also provides a stunning, blatant perspective on horror that’s not only relevant to this short, but Aster’s entire filmography. It’s only fitting that these are some of his final words before he transitions into horror features:

“You know what Freud says about the nature of horror?” He says that’s when the home becomes unhomelike. Unheimlich. And that’s what this whole place has become. This whole time, and fucking country, and everything else. It’s unheimlich.”


Midsommar is now playing in theaters.

Daniel Kurland is a freelance writer, comedian, and critic, whose work can be read on Splitsider, Bloody Disgusting, Den of Geek, ScreenRant, and across the Internet. Daniel knows that "Psycho II" is better than the original and that the last season of "The X-Files" doesn't deserve the bile that it conjures. If you want a drink thrown in your face, talk to him about "Silent Night, Deadly Night Part II," but he'll always happily talk about the "Puppet Master" franchise. The owls are not what they seem.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading