Connect with us

Editorials

Why Indonesian Horror Films ‘Satan’s Slave’ and Remake ‘Satan’s Slaves’ Should Be Watched Together on Shudder

Published

on

Satans Slaves

In 2017, Satan’s Slaves topped the list of highest-grossing films in Indonesia. After receiving strong buzz during its festival run, the film found a perfect home on Shudder, where it’s continued its reputation as one of the streaming platform’s most frightening offerings. The international success of Satan’s Slaves seems fitting, considering it’s a remake of 1980’s Satan’s Slave, an influential entry in horror for Indonesia. Though it might’ve rocked the nation to its core upon release, Satan’s Slave proved to be a rare find elsewhere for decades. Until now, that is. Recently, Shudder made Satan’s Slave available to watch on their platform, serving up two distinct generations of vital Indonesian horror.

Touted as a remake of 1979’s Phantasm, 1980’s Satan’s Slave transformed Indonesian horror. Before its release, the genre was dominated by special effects-driven movies heavy on the gore. Satan’s Slave relied on eerie atmosphere and unsettling imagery. Directed by horror director Sisworo Gautama Putra, the film opens to a family in mourning. Mawarti succumbed to a mysterious illness, leaving behind her two children, Tomi and Rita, and husband Munarto. Munarto is mostly an absent father, preoccupied with work, and accumulating wealth. That leaves Rita struggling to figure out what’s happening with her younger brother Tomi, who insists the ghost of his mother is haunting him. Things get even stranger after the arrival of new housekeeper Darminah, an occultist woman with nefarious intentions.

Satan’s Slave goes to great lengths to show that this family’s life is devoid of religion, in turn making them susceptible to evil. They’re too occupied with the material or hedonistic things in life to practice. Rita enjoys disco parties and spending time with her boyfriend, Herman. It’s safe to assume mom Mawarti enjoyed the wealth provided by her workaholic and ambitious husband. Tomi seems interested in spirituality, but being left on his own without guidance means he’s prone to getting into trouble with his dabbling. Only the family’s sickly servant Mr. Karto is in tune with religion, though it can’t save him from the encroaching evil. Darminah systematically removes those closest to the family and uses them as undead slaves to wreak havoc. Only the help of a shaman and religion can spare them from becoming slaves of Satan.

It’s interesting to watch this film alongside its remake. To a modern audience, Satan’s Slave can read as camp, a product of its era. It’s clear that Sisworo Gautama Putra intended serious horror, though, and it proved massively effective on audiences in 1980. That includes Joko Anwar, who couldn’t get the film out of his head after being traumatized by fear in his first exposure to it—remaking a formative movie, the lifelong horror fan adhered to the essence of Satan’s Slave, the eerie atmosphere. While the original retained a simple good vs. evil plot, Anwar added complexity. In the remake, the death of the mother unleashes a curse birthed from a Satanic pact. How that unfolds proves far more complicated than before, but more importantly, it’s far scarier. Anwar employs every tool in his arsenal amassed from a lifelong affinity for the genre to deliver potent scares that come at a consistent pace. 

Having access to Satan’s Slave on the same streaming platform as its remake doesn’t just work as an examination of cultural horror through generations. It provides the necessary context for the ending of Anwar’s film. Until this point, Satan’s Slaves offered a cryptic coda only insiders could interpret. In it, the surviving family members have fled their home and moved into a flat in the city. A neighbor brings them food before returning to her apartment, where she conspires with her partner to keep the family close. Their ill-intent makes it clear for any viewer that the family remains in danger, but it’s still a strange tease for a potential sequel. The mysterious woman’s lover then calls her by her name: Darminah. As in, the primary antagonist of the original film.

Applying the context of Satan’s Slave suddenly makes a seemingly benign ending to Satan’s Slaves more menacing. There’s now a face for the cult that tormented our protagonists. Being able to see the 1980 film expands on why this is an exciting tease for a sequel. Or at least, there’d better be a sequel. Thanks to streaming services like Shudder, or boutique labels like Severin (who’s releasing Satan’s Slave on Blu-ray soon), obscure horror films are being unearthed and made readily available to fans. It gives us a chance to see cinematic history on an international scale. In this case, it allows us to see how Indonesia loosely interpreted Phantasm, turned it into a groundbreaking horror film in its native country. Then that film inspired a modern retelling so successful at terrifying audiences that it’s ensured Joko Anwar is a genre filmmaker to watch on an international scale.

In terms of access to international horror, it’s a great time to be a fan. 

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading