Feast II: Sloppy Seconds (V)
| release date | October 7 2008 |
| studio | Dimension Films |
| director | John Gulager |
| writer | Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan |
| starring | Jenny Wade, Krista Allen, Diane Goldner, Clu Gulager, Josh Zuckerman, Balthazar Getty, Navi Rawat, Judah Friedlander |
| trailer 1 | Trailer #1 |
8 Comments
I’ve read quite a few negative reviews for this flick so far but I actually kind of dug this movie.
Is it better than the the first one? Of course not. But it’s still a helluva fun way to spend 90 minutes.
Positives: As state above; the movie is fun as hell. It’s slightly more on the comedic side than the previous entry but I still enjoyed almost every minute of it. The fight between Honey Pie and Bartender was kick ass. Also, Martin Klebba is actually quite good. I was shocked to see a dramatic performance by the little man from Pirates of the Caribbean.
Negatives: Majority of the characters aren’t as good as the first one. I really didn’t care if they died, and most of the them didn’t. There were very few killings of the major characters. Whether you liked the first characters or not, you still cared about their outcome. My only real PROBLEM with the film is how the entire finale of the film on the roof is shot on green screen, very similar to Pulse 2. There seemed to be no reason for the use of green screen, especially since there are real shots from the ground level. The ending was also a little abrupt. Obviously setting up for part III, but it was just way too fast.
Overall, fans of the original should get a kick out Feast II. Others might not dig it as much as I did.
Anyways, until next time.
i thought it was going to be worst
It wasn’t bad, but I feel like most of my questions weren’t answered. And where the hell were Hot Wheels, Bozo, and Tuffy?! It say’s they were in this one.
No where near as good as the first movie. They had a good money maker with Feast, now the effort is gone. Bad writing, bad acting with the exception of Martin Klebba (Pirates of the Caribbean), bad CG… The monster suit’s out in the daylight? Just silly. There are a few funny bit’s, the dwarf with the big willy for one. And some really good gore. But the story is all over the place, seems more like a film students weekend project. Hard to believe it is the same writers and director from the first movie, which was great. Worth renting? If there is nothing else on the shelf. Worth buying? Only if you like 80′s B style low budget gore flix.
I dont know about you guys but i liked it, although and stop me if you disagree but i really dont want to know where these things came from. Some things are just better left unsaid. However i wonder if blathazar getty will come back for another one since the biker queen and her hot And i do mean HOTTTT biker babes are on the hunt for him. The baby scene was freakin halrious…oh and really sad too.
There were parts of this movie that were pretty good and there were alot of bad parts that were just plain stupid. Overall definitely worth watching. Bring on part 3.
finally the long long wait for the follow up to one of the coolest, bad ass horror films in years with “Feast”, I have been anticipating the sequel as much as any film out there. so did i top the original? of course not, i think topping what the first one did was completely impossible to even try to do, so what’s the solution, go in a slightly different direction but not too far off, try to bring back the humor of the original and make it crazy fun over the top, in doing so the film succeeds in many ways, fun characters, very very hilarious moments, cool creatures, and an all around fun ride of a film…but i must express my only few dislikes about the film, it seems like cgi is present here and there, and it isnt very good cgi either, but other than that hiccup, another hiccup is the continuation of the characters from the first film that left in the trans am car, although it was cool to see CLU back again, and a few others there really wasnt a whole lot of cast from the original, overall i would give this a 8/10 rating. it’s still more bad ass than most garbage horror films coming out here and there. MIDNIGHT MEAT TRAIN and this one is my new favorites of recent memory!
Holy shit I rarely love sequels but this was just as badass as the first no to mention that it was so effin funny. I wish they would have answered more questions about what was going on and how the hell the monsters appeared but I didnt really care. Amazing sequel to the first. Now I cant wait for the third one. Bring on the Feast!!
this film is proof of how lazyness can kill a series. if this shows us anything for what we can expect in third installment; i hope it gets put on hold indefinately. like others have said, and i agree, it is hard to believe the same team from the original put this together. the cgi was the nail-in-the-coffin. the green-screened roof top was absolutely unecessary. i could see the promise of the film beyond the haze, unfortunately the filmmakers half-assed this thing together. oh yes, one other thing, the coninuity was terrible through out the whole film.
This movie is absolutely terrible! I loved the first one but this one is just complete trash. The characters have no development whatsoever, not that they had much in the first but you at least got a little sense of who the people where. This one they all have no personality and are incredibly stupid. In the first film the people reacted realistically to what was happening around them but in this one… come on this biker queen is so obsessed for revenge that she doesn’t notice or react to anything going on around her? Dead dismembered bodies, no reaction, friends dying, no reaction. But she wants revenge because her sister is dead. And the whole baby thing was lame as hell too. I thought feast kicked major ass, this is a major let down and one of the worst sequels i’ve ever seen period. DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME!!!
The title describes the movie perfectly. Sloppy.
The first one was fantastic, but this one tried to outdo it in every field and it just ended up a mess of dumb jokes and bad special effects. It did have some decent gore and action, but that wasn’t enough to save the movie. Overall it was just disappointing
Well all I can say is OMG
the gore was good but the baby killing not so much.
I didn’t love it for a lot of reasons but the dead baby was the most disgusting thing I have ever seen.
If that hadn’t happened I might of liked this movie.
feast two FTW thank you
I thought the movie was TERRIBLE. I need to write a review. I can’t believe the entire third act was in front of a screen screen sky!
Can ratings go into the negatives on this thing? This one is so bad it effects my view of the amazing first one.
The only thing stopping me from giving this movie the lowest score possible is the hot naked biker bitches near the end. This movie is just plain terrible, which is a shame considering the first movie was so good.
Just as good as the first one, imo.
I have to disagree, yes it was not like the first movie and would you really want it to be? If it where just like the first one you would be bitching about how it “was just like the first one”. Feast II had tones of gore, naked tattoo chick, wrestling midgets and laughs all around. No, it will not surpass the original but it is not as bad as everyone is making it out to be.
Feast 2? Well I loved the first one. Mostly because my curiousity got the better of me while watching the third season of Project Greenlight aka “The Making of Feast”. It turned out to be pretty good. The sequel on the other hand is an all around disappointment. Primarily because the lead characters of Bozo, Tuffy, and Wheels from the original, while supposedly credited, are not even in this flick. I guess the two second flashback sequence of scenes from the first movie counts as their appearance. Beyond this the movie is nothing more than a throwback to Grindhouse style 70′s exploitation flicks which I never considered the first one to be. This movie is chock full of gratuitous, and often unnecessary, violence, sex and nudity, and monster bodily fluids. One may argue that that was exactly what the first movie was but I beg to differ. The first Feast had likeable characters, action, horror, intelligence, and style. Sure there was some gross out gags that really didn’t have to be there, but they made it work. Feast 2 had very little of anything real important going on, you could care less about whether or not anyone lived or died, most of the violence that took place was not even cause by or to the vicious attack monsters but by the characters we’re supposed to be rooting for. For the most part we don’t see much of a grisly end to the horrible human beings in this film and the people who do meet disgusting and horrific ends are innocents who would’ve been better off being put out of their misery from the start of the movie as every action taken by the morons in this film result in things far worse than what the rampaging monsters they’re running from ever would’ve done to them. This movie was clearly only for shock value, and in the most horrible ways imaginable, the first movie shocked but at least had substance…and it was a true horror comedy, that is, it was actually fun. There’s nothing funny about this movie. If this movie did anything worth doing, was help make the world realize how great the first movie was.
Yikes! This movie was a real mess. It clearly lacked focus, direction, plot, you name it. Were left with so little plot that everything happening is either pointless or minor. The creatures feel unthreatening because they only appear when you expect them to. The filmmakers also tried to disgust and offend the viewer while making them laugh. Well, they completely missed the mark to say the least. Watching a child fall to ground, convulse in its own puddle of blood, and then get eaten by a creature isn’t exactly my definition of funny or risky. It’s tasteless, pointless, and shows just how witless the creators really are. Before seeing this film, I thought it had a neat concept. Take the creatures from the original Feast, put em in an open area, and just have damn fun. Heh, I was majorly wrong. There are countless scenes of characters sitting around doing NOTHING, its so dull and boring that I actually shut the movie off after 70 minutes. That should give you an idea of how bad this garbage is. The direction in this movie is absolutely atrocious! The camera zooms in and out while shaking all over the place. The movie seriously feels like its being filmed on a handheld camera. Well, I could go on, but this movie really doesn’t deserve my time. I’ve warned you all and I hope you heed my warning.
Well.I was a little disapointed. But I still liked it sort of. I try mind the horrible Green screen. They dont really show the monsters that much. Two hot topless biker chicks ^_^ IDK. but the gore… idk it was… Incorrect. The Baby sceen was brutal. And i liked it! I liked the Part where The bartender was beating Honey pie up. SMASH!! right out of the window. I like the action. It was corny though. and some of the acting was terrible. Like when the monster came out of the door and Secrets started screaming. God i wanted to punch her. CGI Blood
, sad. idk I think i will give That B*tch of a director one more chance to impress me ever since the first feast came out. Well this movie has bad and good so i give it a passing mark of 6/10. P.S You son of a b*tch better not make Happy finish Suck even more ass. Okay:) Bye Bye.
Eh!!!
I don’t think people are realizing what they’re watching when they’re giving this film a bad rep. This movie is supposed to be offensive. It’s supposed to be tasteless. It’s supposed to be over-the-top. That’s what makes it GREAT. I loved this movie just as much as the first one. Sure, there wasn’t anyone to fill Henry Rollins’ shoes (he was the funniest character in the first, in my opinion) but all the comedic, ridiculous, gratuitous gold is still there. Like I said, I don’t think people has their expectations set properly or what they thought they were going to see, but if you liked the first one, and if you understand what they were going for, you’ll love this one and eagerly await the third. 10/10.
There have always been two things that have bothered me about the vast majority of the horror genre: (1) How so many “horror” movies can be no scarier than choking on food, but still be considered “horror”, and (2) how so many “horror” movies can be no more offensive or gruesome than your average feel-good, PG-rated kid’s movie. I’m all for art-house movies, don’t get me wrong. I’m all for art-house horror movies, even, but only if they have an edge that makes them more difficult to watch than your standard TV drama. Maybe that’s my point: true horror movies should be difficult to watch, but very few of them are. The subject matter and the gore in Feast II: Sloppy Seconds isn’t exactly the most over-the-top ever filmed, but Feast II: Sloppy Seconds at least has that punk, distasteful edge that lacks in your standard horror flick. That’s what makes it so amazing to behold. As one review site said, “Horror movies all consist of the same thing: people getting naked, cursing, screaming, bleeding, and then dying.” While films like Saw broke this clichéd formula and brought long needed originality to the horror genre, they’re meant to be taken seriously, and there is nothing wrong with that. Feast II: Sloppy Seconds, written by the same people who wrote Saw IV, is almost the equal opposite: it brings originality and anti-formula to the comedic side of the horror genre. Thank God someone gets it.
So just how insane is this gore I mentioned? Well, it’s pretty good. I watched the R-rated cut because I rented it from Blockbuster (whom does not rent the unrated cut, so you know) and it was still more hardcore than most unrated and NC-17-rated movies I’ve seen lately. What makes the gore in Feast II: Sloppy Seconds so great is that it is different, brutal, and distasteful. I’ve seen people calling movies like Braindead “the goriest movie ever made!”, but I strongly disagree because the gore in those movies is always generic and predictable. You’ve seen it all before, just not in the same quantity. You’ve never seen gore like Feast II: Sloppy Seconds before. It isn’t as prevalent as other movies, but it’s different. The infamous baby scene that has people crying foul makes me happy simply because it shows someone in our society is trying to bring back true horror, when it offended us, not just made us shrug.
Something that people are also complaining about is the lack of direction, or straightforward plot. What more can I say but: that was the POINT. If you cannot understand that some art tries to confuse, and tries not to form-fit to the cliché formula they taught in middle school, I don’t know why you even picked up this movie. Likewise, the 300-like CGI backgrounds and terrible monster suits were also the POINT. It wasn’t meant to look slick, nor was it playing into the cult horror cliché and trying to look run down. As I’ve said three times now, Feast II: Sloppy Seconds tries–and mostly succeeds–to be original on every level. Why is that so hard for people to understand?
How does it compare to the first Feast? Well, anyone who claims this is less original or less absurd than the original is just downright wrong. The main problem I had with the first Feast was it was trying to be cliché-defying, yet it ironically still ended up being just another cliché monster movie. Feast still followed the safe formulas. Feast II: Sloppy Seconds, however, breaks every genre cliché both in formula and in actions. The big one that really impressed me was that Feast II: Sloppy Seconds is set in the day, which is rarely done in movies like this, and there are countless others. Way more than the first Feast. However, the main thing that you’ll notice about Feast II: Sloppy Seconds, is that it isn’t as technically well-done as the first, but I think this worked for the aesthetic rather than against it.
Overall, yes this movie will get bad reviews because it isn’t the safe genre piece that people are looking for. I really think this separates the gorehounds from the freaks, in a way. There really is something wrong with enjoying the gore in this film. I shouldn’t have liked it, but I did. A lot of people, even gorehounds, won’t like it because it isn’t generic gore. It isn’t safe formula-horror.
If you’re like me and are desperately searching for something, anything, to differentiate itself from the unoriginal mess cinema has become, look no further.
ok, so i was really excited to see this movie when i had heard that they were making it. i cant say that it was horrible, but it really wasnt that good. everyone seems to hate the bad acting and the horrible cg that they used, but that didnt bother me one bit. *SPOILER* but the thing that really kinda bothered me was the whole autopsy scene of the feast monster, and the whole giant eye and mouth inside it and it screaming, that kind of threw me off. but other than that, i would have to say that i thought it was a pretty good movie, but it can never beat the first one.
Not a patch on the first one but still above average horror film . i hope the third will be as dark as were led to belive ????????
Feast II Sloppy Seconds got me laid.
What got me laid? If you have to ask then you didn’t watch the movie.
Save the Baby! Splattertastic FUN!
Damn I love the first “Feast.” The first one redefined a new genre for monster movies with gore, humor and twists galore.It was very unpredictable.I had high hopes for “Feast 2″ with the beginning opening where the first left off: The three survivors: Krista Allen and Balthazar Getty’s characters with the crippled dude high tailing it from the scene of the mayhem (I now just think they were anxiously fleeing the chance to star in the sequel after reading the script.Good decision!)Anyway- Feast 2 is filled with a few returning characters including an unecessary dream sequence of a shirtless Judah Freidlander(Gross!)Biker Chick’s twin sis and her all girl biker babes (not that appealing) are on a vengeance to find out just what happened to Biker Chick from the original.They truly find out as the small town is over run by these gross creatures as they wreak havoc in the battle of man vs. beast.I was so cheering on the creatures to kill everyone because the characters in the second film were really not that likable and quite annoying. At least they could have saved the baby.A bit in bad taste, Feast 2 plays on the gore and gross factors and a few gratuitous booby shots to try to be good.I kind of feel ripped off and almost wish I didn’t watch the sequel since the first one was that good. So watch at your own risk but don’t say you weren’t warned.
What a fucking disapointment! This shit pot was just awful. The first one is still one of the best horror films of the last ten years, but they really messed up on this one. The baby scene? Un-fucking-necessary. Didn’t add anything to the story. And i am not one to knock mindless violence and gore, but that scene was just stupid! If you have seen the first one, then you have to watch this fuckstack of a movie, but please don’t expect the brilliantness or originality you got with Feast. Midgets wrestling? Is this movie aimed at fucking five year olds.
fucking horrendous… Seriously a complete waste of money and an embarrassment for what could’ve been an awesome little franchise. I wish I could get that hour and 40 minutes back in my life. First I sat through the horrible acting in Quarantine, came home with this from the mall and ended up seeing 2 of the worst horror films in a while.
I did rofl at the baby part. Not too excited for the 3rd, that’s for sure.
Great Bad Taste Movie. Good Splatter Movie.
Loved the first Feast movie, so the anticipation for the second, i couldnt wait. loved the characters, the gore, the humour that made you chuckle to yourself but somehow it just let itself down. the creatures costumes are not the best the CGI is a little low budget and worst of all the baby scene. How did that get in there, my jaw dropped watching that scene. anyway if you want to leave your brain at the door and watch a movie for fun guts and gore then i would recommend it.
Wow….how can you review Feast II and complain about lack of direction, story-line, unnecessary violence, boobs, and acting. This is splatter horror at its finest. Over the top gore, nudity, laughs, and yes….a jaw dropping baby scene. Awesome fun! Highly recommended. Will be buying the DVD and am looking forward to the next one.
Loads of fun, a gorefest through and through. Highly illogical, but that’s kind of the point of it all. Insane baby scene, awesome new characters, intense ending, and the coolest midgets EVER. A great follow-up to the first movie, nothing to complain about here. Bring on the third flick!
Fucking brilliant.
Plain and simple.
Ugh. What a craptastic waste of time. Poorly made and gross for the sake of being gross. Not half as much fun as the first one.
Feast II definitely shakes things up a bit. Feast was gory, vulger, offensive, cheesy, and odd all at once so it was to be expected that Feast II would be as well.
Less death by monster than you would have expected but still tons of death none the less. A Dynamite-wielding meth-hobo, blood/revenge thirsty biker chicks, wrestling mexican midgets, a used car sales love triangle, and a blonde chick who won’t die? There is so much randomness going on you almost loose sight of the fact the town is being attacked by sex-driven mutant monsters.
If you are looking for a classic supernatural monster flick, this is not for you. If you are looking for something that breaks the routine of your typical slasher/pyscho-thriller/vamp-were/white trash renegade films, then watch it.
I was torn between laughing and grossed out. And then I laughed because I finally found something that grossed me out. I guess if you are like me and have become desensitized to horror/gore flicks, Feast II will for sure make you look twice.
Some people will bash it because of the obvious attempt at shock value via comedic slaughter and overdone innuendos but I for one guess my final thought is that there wasn’t a point in the movie when I was bored or recognized a scene I had seen a thousand times. That wins it a rewatch from me when I get bored and need a good WTF moment.
Loved the first and while not as good, Feast II is still badass. The baby scene actually made my girlfriend cry. lol. I guess being a mother to our 3 year old, she can relate. On the other hand, I know it’s just a movie and thought it was hilarious. Offensive, gory, and tasteless. Can’t wait for Feast III.
Not as good as the first one but still fun…
Not as good as the first (there isn’t much out there that is, in my opinion) but still a very worthy sequel. Gratuitous, ridiculous, and hilarious. Two words: Monster autopsy… if you’ve seen in you know what I’m talking about.
For the complainers out there, it’s supposed to be cheesy. Sure they could have shot the roof scenes on an actual roof, but it’s supposed to be cheesy. Bad CGI? It’s supposed to be cheesy. If you don’t get it, quit bitching and watch some crappy Hollywood remake.
Oh, and those of you whining about the baby scene, that was f*ckin hilarious. You people will watch movies with people getting decapitated, mutilated, eviscerated, burned alive, tortured, splattered by a bus… but the second a baby dies you pussies start crying. If you can’t take the gore, step out of the slaughterhouse… and pass me another hunk of aborted fetus on your way out. F*ckin rookies…
ehh, not what I was hoping for. Still, I love Honey Pie. Glad she lived.
Baby-chomping, midget ripping, monster cumming awesomeness. I love this sequel and no, it’s not Feast, but it’s fun as hell and I fucking loved it.
All I can say is damn the shit they do to monsters, grandmas’ babies and midgets is insane. This is seriously one fucked up movie but that is also why it was damn good.
I liked it for the first half hour. About the time the autopsy scene got REALLY animated (with the monster-shit and every other bodily fluid flying everywhere), is where the movie went to hell. Really a disappointment.
i Had a good long review but zombies decided to eat my page.
A better edit of this movie *might* have made it a tolerable movie, but it’s no where the classic that is FEAST. Pointless scenes go on for toooooo daaamn loooooong, and while the “artsy” stuff is great, there’s just no room for it in this tasteless, nauseating splatter movie. It has the exact set-up of the first one with none of the charm, irony, timing, surprise, good acting or restraint. The writing is completely sub-par, rushed, and uninspired. I can’t believe the same people made the sequel. This is overindulgent and a complete mess. Not looking forward to Feast III at all.
Not as good as the first, but entertaining in it’s own tasteless way.
It lacked scares and the lack of budget really shows in the third act.
This in no way was a good movie, but it was fun in that bad for you kind of way that candy is.
And I just have to add, for horror fans, a lot of you sure are acting like little bitches over that baby scene.
good movie , not an great one .
I gave it 7.1/10 I like it so much , but I loved the first one better .
Feast 2 : Sloppy Seconds….the title says it all this film is fucking sloppy and rushed.
Waste of my time. I Loved the first one and was looking forward to the second. Deeply disappointing. The only good idea was the asshole who took his own life on the roof. The cumming beast was hysterical and the wrestling midgets just makes you shake your head.
The only thing that Feast II had to offer was blood and guts, but that wasn’t enough for me. It was slow and just seemed to drag on pointlessly. Too many long unnecessary scenes. There weren’t any scares or suspense, and the characters were uninteresting. I was only slightly entertained. This movie is watchable but if you never see it you aren’t missing anything.
For a good time see the first one.
I’ve decided the Feast guys are obsessed with penises (both human and monster) and sperm.
This movie was such a disappointment after the great first one. There are so many sections of this movie that don’t even make sense at all and are completely point less. Even the ones put in for shock value were poorly delivered and wasted. This film tried to be all artsy fartsy and failed. I know people will say “it’s supposed to be cheesy and bad” and trust me, they would be wrong. That may be what they tried to go for, but they failed.
The gore was ok, but the random blood splatters looked like cheap video game effects. It was bad.
I was excited to hear there was a sequel after I loved the first Feast, but man was I wrong. I hope the next one redeems itself.
Loved it, might even have been better than the first. I’ve heard a lot of people complaining and I just can’t figure out why.
It was funnier, gorier, and just awesome all around. One of the most fun horror movies since the first one.
Wow, the only good part of that movie was the last 10 minutes. And only for the midget and moustache guy getting killed and the hot biker tits. other than that, this movie was NOT good. I’m not that hard to please when it comes to horror, I allow for suspension of disbelief and i allow myself to just be entertained. this movie BARELY did that. ps, they said they needed to make a sacrifice and then threw a chick off the roof… it made no sense. you’ll know when you see it.
Blatant Campiness: Check
Blatant Cheesy Special Effects: Check
Explosions: Check
Gore: Check
Semen: Check
Cheesy Dialog: Check
Cat Humping: Check
Guns: Check
Flying Midgets: Check
Baby Eating: Check
Mustache: Check
Weiners: Check
Gary Oldman: N/A
Almost perfect movie. Not sure why people are disliking this obviously cheesy horror movie. Don’t watch this Feast movie and expect a Kurosawa film. Watch this Feast movie as a Feast movie.
This movie was horrible. While i enjoyed the first film and got kick out of it. This movie was crap the storyline crap,the characters CRAP!,and the director is crap. The director is a moron who instead of getting another woman to play harley moms sister he jsut uses his wife. God forbid you have to hire another actor. Jon Gulager did real well with the first movie then he really jsut fucked up big time with this steaming pile of shit. This movie tries to hard to shock and freak you out. Which it did none of that for me it did make me feel dirty and well like i needed to take a shower after watching this piece of shit movie. Oh, and i guess the director has an obsession with killing kids which says alot about him great another Victor Salva except he is a child killer this time. You killed a baby isn’t that trying a little too ahrd to shock us. Help u felt more sorry for the cat that got raped.
Even though some of the scenes in this sequel were far fetched,I enjoyed the hell out of it because of the effects and the gore.I wonder if that’s why there has been so many negative reviews.
I’m just going to give it a little over halfway good score. This movie was not at all what I was expecting (for the most part, anyway), and yes, the green screen sky background annoyed me as well. I think the most hilarious part for me was when Honey Pie was dreaming about Judah Friedlander’s character from the first one. That got me laughing. And the ending was good, too. And by the ending, I don’t mean when the monsters got on the roof, I mean that part during the credits. Meh, the movie was ok. Hopefully the third one is more like the first one.
This movie kicked ass! I could not stop laughing when the baby got killed, how far can you go to shock people? Brilliant!
it’s not the worst movie i’ve ever seen but it was kind of pointless. some of the gore was cool and that chick with the red hair was hot. “slasher” had some great lines but the rest of the cast (with the exception of thunder and lightning) were just average and i felt like their storylines went nowhere. the ending was horrible.
Sloppy Seconds is right! All of the wit and originality that made me love the first installment, is totally lost here. This is just a series of low brow gags and gore, just for the sake of being shocking and with no real purpose. I would guess that every character vomits at least 6 times throughout the course of the film. If that’s the kinda thing your into, then Feast II is for you. John Gulager, you sir have let me down.
i didn’t like this movie just because it’s nothing compared the 1st one but if this was a diffrent movie about monsters it would have been good
but it isn’t so i can’t help but be disappointed
in it…i didn’t like any of the people in this movie except for the two hot chicks that are topless at the end =]
the best way to see this movie is with a group of freinds =] that like gore dumb story’s and hot biker chicks =]
oh u gotta be kidding me ri8? how they r writing for SAW movies ?? … cheeeeeeeeap
After seeing the first Feast and listening to all hype that this film was given, I just could not wait to see it. But after finally watching it, I feel like as if some of that hype was all for nothing. This movie was entertaining, but it is nothing compared to the first movie. I kept hearing that this film was going to serve up twice the gore from the first film, but it turns out that the first film had twice the gore. The gore in the first Feast was much better than this one. In most of the film, the CG becomes too apparent. Not only that, but the acting was just too bad at some points. And the chronolgy was pretty bad, like why did Honey Pie ditch the safety of the Coors Light truck and how did Bartender get outside under a truck? Plus this movie did not get really entertaining until the last half of the movie. And the ending was questionable. Apparently it is suggested that all of the people on the roof get killed by the monsters and Honey Pie dies. Well then how can they even suggest about a third movie? Despite these flaws, the film was moderately entertaining, but I advise people to just be careful because it is a love/hate film. Now I feel very skeptical about Feast 3.
I thought this movie was going to be a great funny horror movie just like the first, I was wrong this movie attempts to be funny but only succeeds at a few points, the baby death and the giant midget penis. The gore was horribly done if you want to see a good funny horror film check out the first Feast skip this one
I thought this movie was going to be good. This movie was a fucking ripoff. The monsters looked like shit. All the fake stuff they used in this movie was just stupid. You would have to be stupid to buy or rent this movie. See the first not the second.
It was not fun – listen guys – it was not at all fun after FEAST – it was an ordeal – Yes but it lived up to its name especially the sloppy part – Downright unhealthy and horrible and just so plain bad BUT I LOVED IT ….IT WAS SO BAD THAT I LOVED …I JUST CAN’T UNDERSTND WHY..IT BROKE EVRYTHING A HORROR MONSTER CREATURE FEATURE ENCAPSULATES .. U BASICALLY WATCH THE MOVIE believing, somewhere down the line it will walk the line ..it will become a genuine trademark FEEL GOOD horror movie and then it just shocks u … and tells u … GOTCHA…The baby death kicks ass!!!Its actually a masterpiece but its bad ….Its so BAD THAT its Good..Its a completely Surpising movie for a DIE hard horror FAN, who believes who knows whats gonna happen next but he never guesses it right.
As with most reviews I to didn’t think that it was as good as the first, but because the first surprised me so much the sequel didn’t leave much for me to go “damn that was messed up”. It was just as gory as the first, had mostly the same humor, but nothing happened that really surprised me. The baby death I was ready for because a friend warned me before hand, and I was ok with that scene because it was a Feast movie and whether one liked it or not, it would be something that I would expect to see in this type of film.
My thing is, is that this is a decent film, just not as good as the first because the shock is worn off. I also thought that some of scenes were drug out too long to fill space. The pace was not as fast as the first.
Hope that the third film ups the ante on what’s going to happen, and according to an article I read in a horror magazine it will.
did anyone really expect to take this movie seriously???
this film is one of the greatest of its kind….like someone else said SO BAD I LOVED IT
I have to say, I thought the baby scene was quite disturbing… It takes a lot to really bother me, but that scene just seemed… wrong. A personal opinion, I know it didn’t bother everyone by any means. Otherwise, I thought it wasn’t nearly as good as the first (the long scene with alien autopsy with it “farting,” blowing bodily fluids on to people, etc. was just stupid). Still a better than average movie.
Not as good as the first but a fucking wierd ass movie. If you liked the first check it out.
I loved it!!
It was a terrible, terrible film! Nothing like the first at all and no Krista Allen either.
No where near as good as the first, but still an entertaining movie.
My only complaint is with the last 30 mins or so when they get outside on the roof, the blue screen is about as bad I can recall in a movie. But, I don’t see how anyone who loved the first wouldn’t love the second. I mean it’s not a serious movie by any stretch of the imagination. Aside from the blue screen sucking, everything else was there in full force. I actually liked how it did flashbacks to some of the scenes from the first. It was also good seeing the flashback with a different angle when biker bitch gets her leg severed since in the original the scene was so fast and shaky that you couldn’t actually see the leg get severed unless you threw it on slow motion. If you watch this movie with the right attitude you’ll love it, plain and simple.
No that good as ‘Feast’, not that bad.
Is interesting, but the dissection part was too much for me, totally disgusting. Don
i realy liked the first but what the fuck was this?shitty from babies, to farts, to greenscreen, just shit!
It was weird but funny lol
5/10 for being hilarious. but this one was way too random. much more so than the first. and it became less about the monsters fighting them and more about them fighting each other, which was lame. baby being thrown in the air earned it 4 of those skulls btw. i almost cried with laughter
hated it. Like everyone else i believe they ruined this trilogy. The 1st was so good then these pieces of shit came out. the 3rd was better than the 2nd but neither were as good as the 1st in my opinion.
Wait a minute… this is stupid.
The stuff with granny was pretty funny but man, John Gulager must love making us hate him.
First of all, like a lot of other reviewers who gave a 1/10, I LOVED the first Feast. It is in my top 5 favorite gore-horror flicks. But the sequel was 100% sloppy garbage.
It starts off ok, picking up the morning after the 1st one ended. The sister of the biker-chick shows up to find her sister’s arm in the mouth of a dog, and the injured old bartender hiding under a truck. So, out of reasons of vendetta, she takes the bartender hostage, looking for “Bozo”, whom she thinks is responsbile for her sister’s death. Not to give away the storyline to those who want to see this, but that is the only piece of plot I could comprehend in 100 minutes. She never even finds “Bozo”!
In one of the most tasteless, disturbing and shocking sequences I’ve ever seen in a film, a cute baby is hurled into the air. We then see him falling in slow-motion before he hits the ground. We then see the poor child crying and writhing in a pool of his own blood before being eaten by the monsters.
I understand the point of the Feast movies, to be funny and gory and they are, but why kill a baby?
Theres is something about this Feast movie, that jsut wasn’t that good at all. There was virtually no gore and just full of cut aways, the background greeen green thing sucked ass, and it amounted nothing to the original.
I had high hopes going into this movie and they were almost all dissapointments. I LOVED THE FIRST ONE, but this one is the worst of the three.
It still deserves very little credit from me, mostly because something about thte last ten or so minutes was just perfect and the baby scene was just messed up and kind of funny in the darkest ways. You truly hate some of the characters and there are some good moments in this one.
But overall this movie sucked, I wouldn’t really recommend it but it did have some good qualities too it. Watch Feast or Feast 3 though for sure, 4/10
I know I am in the minority but I loved this movie. It was silly, ridiculous and over the top. But that is why I liked it. The baby scene alone is worth 3 skulls.
I don’t understand what everyone who gave this movie a bad review was expecting to see when watching this movie, but for me, it pretty much had everything I expected and more. I simply loved the first film, it blew me away when I saw it and left me shaking my head in awe at the over the top craziness, gore and sick humor. That being said, I thought that, although not quite as awesome as feast 1, sloppy seconds amused me with it’s sickness, gore and humor, and who doesn’t like a baby thrown into the path of a monster as a food diversion? I can’t wait to see the third one.
An instant classic for reasons I may never be able to explain
More insane fun, if you enjoyed the original then continue right along because they don’t let up! Look for the baby scene, it’s priceless.
not really as good as the first i thought opening it up and not having the film take place in a confined space kind of took something away for me, the budget for me felt smaller than the first and some of the effects where poor…..i understand the first ones effects werent amazing but they were first class compared to this, just stick with the original and proberly give this one a miss would be the best advice i could possibly give
Another on ehas intense, funny, weird, mercyless, cruel, naked, and never ending tension movie.
Much better picture, and more light on the movie.
IF you enjoyed the original, take this one with you as weel.
I assure you no regrets.
Such a bizarre and awesome movie. Feast I, II, and III make the craziest / funniest horror trilogy ever.
The first Feast was such an achievement in no-budget horror so it’s very sad that this sequel had to happen. Feast 2 was more of a tribute to penis-variety than a monster film. There’s a bad irony where a nude little man runs around with a giant penis. Then, there’s another scene where the group of survivors autopsy a dead monster for reasons that only Paris Hilton would suggest.
The monster has, of course, a monster of a wenis. If dead people have the death-grip, then dead monsters have the sperm-squirt. It’s more of a splash than a squirt really when an entire gal biker gang gets covered in semen. The original Feast was able to be disgusting AND funny at the same time. Feast 2 added up some more gore, but lost its humor. Plus, the cast in this one had no chemistry. And the baby-killing scene was just wrong. Come on, guys, some respect please?
It Tried To Be Like The Fist But It Wasnt
What was Gulager thinking? This sure was one of the shittiest movies I ever seen – and probably one of the shittiest sequels ever made too.
No plot at all, lame actors, terrible CGI, lengthy scenes galore, pointless scenes galore, disgusting and annoying scenes galore. Makes me not wanna watch Part 3.
i thought it was pretty fucked up i really liked the first on but this one was just pain stupid there was no plot no chemistry between the charecters and the baby scene we;l that was just fucking distasteful it mentally and emotionlly scared me for life but the acting was pretty good this movie fucking sucks!!!!!!!
I did enjoy this, but it was really disgusting. I still think it was good, but killing old ladies and babies was way way way over the top. Yet it was good and it made me want to see the 3rd film. The movie should have said,
“NO BABIES WERE HARMED IN THE MAKING OF THIS FILM”
At the end.
Crap second film so glad the third come through with the goods.
total brain-fuck. i didn’t like it at all.
Sure, it’s completely insane, but that’s why I couldn’t stop watching. Decapitations, toddler sacrifices, hot shirtless women…couldn’t wait to see what came next! A little long, but could have been much worse. More details here:
http://thewolfmancometh.com/2010/06/25/feast-2-sloppy-seconds-2008/
More gore and comedy, much like the first.
if your a fan of the first one that you will without a doubt love this squeal. this goes without saying if you hated feast,you should probably just stop reading this. on top of this being in my thoughts to be one of the best sequels Ive ever seen,transitioning fantastically, seeing a number of familiar faces returning to be covered in various fluids and chunks. the line gets crossed so frequently it has faded away by the halfway point of the movie.and as well with the habitual line crossing the sheer absurdity and hilarity of the first has been kicked up ten fold. not to mention going out on a wtf that just kinda also gets boasted when watching to the end of the credits setting up the 3rd.if your in for a souper fun gross out gore fest with very little seriousness. well , u know.
Offensive, mean spirited and just plain disgusting in turns; Feast 2 is a foul little flick which fails to capture the spirit of the original; though how painfully it tries. It actually tones down the gore from the original and ups the yuck factor seven fold. Unlike the first film the chracters here are wildly unlikable, save for the midget wrestlers and the biker chicks(I have to say I have a thing for Tat girl). Also the film drags in spots making it hard to maintain suspense and tension, plus unless you have F3 on hand, the ending is a huge fuck you. Still there is enjoyment to be had. Feast 2 goes so far over the line in taste that one cant help but laugh at the depravity on screen; there’s something perversely enjoyable about this film that saves it from being a dud.
This one definitely held up to the standards I was expecting. It was just as fast and bloody as the first one, but it was a bit more humorous. It didn’t quite hold my attention all the way through, but there were definitely a lot of Poultrygeist moments where I said out loud “did that just fucking happen??”
Not as good as the first film but still worth a watch.
Pales in comparison to the original. The characters are not interesting, not even interesting enough for me to want to watch them die. A foolish, poorly written film with too much bodily fluids for no reason. And you REALLY need to screw up for me to poo-poo your use of bodily fluids!
two thumbs down
Ok I appreciate the fact this is a horror but I am sorry this was one of the most stupidest completely and utterly f**^ed up movie I have ever seen in my live. I didn’t even finished it. I will never understand why people would even remotely think that putting in babies in a horror would attract more people or even make the plot better, I am disgusted and scarred for life I don’t think I will ever be able to forget that baby scene in life. It was just so wrong.
Definitely not as good as the first, but still an entertaining movie for those with a twisted sense of humor. Lots of it just straight up sucks, but it’s a good time if you have low (or no) expectations.
fun entertainment !
Just fun. Monster bits and midgets! A true family film!
Just like the first movie, it was amusing, funny, and awesome.