Outcast (VOD)
| release date | August 30 2011 |
| studio | Bloody Disgusting Selects, Indomnia Releasing |
| director | Colm McCarthy |
| writer | Colm McCarthy |
| starring | James Nesbitt, Kate Dickie, James Cosmo, Niail Bruton |
| tagline | Beware the beast within |
| trailer 1 | Trailer #1 |
1 Comments
Not exactly sure what to make of this Scottish low-budget horror thriller
about hungry demons, black magic, social workers and welfare cases.
On the one hand, it’s highly original and refreshing, especially because it deals with themes that we don’t see that often in horror movies (Paganism, life in slum areas, mental retardation).
Nearly all actors deliver awesome performances, especially the incredible and fantastic-looking Kate Dickie.
The settings look great (abandoned houses, rundown factories), the gore is nice and the special effects look neat.
On the other hand, it’s pretty annoying that the movie throws up oodles of questions without ever answering it, due to a muddled script and a crude plot.
The pacing in the first half isn’t always right and the main monster looks a bit silly.
Not a perfect movie, but at least they tried to do something different
Fascinating love child of The Beast Within (’82) and The Hamiltons. Gritty and intriguing, perfect for a rainy afternoon with popcorn. (3/5 skulls)
Colm McCarthy’s “Outcast” is a great film moonlighting as a pretty good one. It’s bloody, creepy, ambitious, and surprisingly engaging; throughout, you get the feeling that it could have been a much better film than it ended up being, but nevertheless you also stop to admire the skill and craft exercised in its making. To say that I didn’t like this movie would be the same as saying that I don’t like directors toying with intriguing ideas within the unchained boundaries of my beloved horror genre. What do the posters and adverts for the film advertise? A slasher film, a “gorno” flick, perhaps even a werewolf movie; but certainly not what “Outcast” truly is. But this makes its success as an entertaining piece of genre filmmaking even more surprising. It leaps from the darkness and attacks full force, but then again most horror movies do that. The uncanny thing about this one is that it delivers a lot more than just the expected blood, guts, and tense scenes; it also has a moral center, a message, and social commentary to boot.
A woman and her son move into an Edinburgh flat. The mother (Kate Dickie) is hiding something. She is anxious, clearly disturbed, and is waking up in the middle of the night to smear strange symbols on the walls of her home. The son (Niall Bruton) seems unaware of what his mother’s intentions are, and lives under her control by night and walks his dog by day. One day, while on a walk, he meets a beautiful young woman who lives nearby (Hanna Stanbridge); although if mother has any say in the matter, they won’t be meeting with one another for much longer. She forbids her boy from engaging in relationships – friendly or romantic – with women his age; warning him that the fairer sex is dangerous and not to be trusted. She is either obsessive or completely mad; nevertheless, the boy does not heed this warning. Meanwhile, while they live out their depressing lives, a bearded man (Liam Cunningham) hunts the mother and the son and a slimy humanoid being stalks the dark streets at night and preys on the innocent.
The characters seem almost nameless at first; but indeed they do make proper identities for themselves as the story progresses. The son is Fergel, the mother Mary, the girlfriend Petronella, and the father Cathal. The strange creature has no name. The story is a perplexing, messy, yet intriguing black pot mixture of Irish mythology, black magic, grotesque monsters, themes of teen angst, and ill-fated crows. It isn’t the easiest movie to buy into but if you can dig it, then you’ll find that it’s more than initially meets the eye. “Outcast” transcends classification; it is not merely a horror film, but also a dark fantasy with some cool thematic elements that more than make up for its shortcomings. This is not a memorable screenplay, and these are not memorable characters; but this is a very thought-provoking picture that (gasp) dares to be different.
The setting of the film gives it its edge, and makes it more or less feel unfamiliar. The Edinburgh neighborhoods are grim and their inhabitants are even more so. The handheld camerawork captures such elements quite well; although I can’t say that it works effectively otherwise. Sometimes I just wanted McCarthy to put down the fucking camera and observe, if only for just a moment, the little character and story moments that this fascinating tale could have benefited from. It’s not annoying to the point where I could not watch it, but I do hope that McCarthy drops this style for his later features. Otherwise, I’m completely fine with it; since the camerawork lends a documentary-esque feel to the film in scenes where this is appropriate.
The performances themselves are forgettable with one exception. Kate Dickie is absolutely brilliant as the overly attached mum. With just a glance, she can chill you right to the bone. And the things she does to the women that threaten to enter her precious little boy’s life are even more diabolical than the appearance of her aging mug. There are many elements that make the flawed but furiously entertaining film worth seeing, and Dickie’s performance is one of them. If you aren’t a true horror fanatic, you might not be as forgiving as those who are. But sometimes the biggest surprises of the year come from the independent side of horror, and I’d much rather watch an ambitious film not quite master every one of its ideas than watch something with no “ideas” at all.