Connect with us

Interviews

Special Feature: ‘Saw Revisited: Jigsaw’s Long Journey’

Published

on

If you’re anything like me, Halloween is more than just an excuse to overindulge on sweets, terrify neighborhood children, and wear provocative costumes (though I’m the first one in line to show a bit of skin). It’s a tradition- and for the past seven years, the SAW films have been an integral part of that ritual. Since the original SAW film hit theaters in October of 2004, we’ve spent the scariest weekend of the year with Jigsaw and his victims, walking away from theaters knowing that the following year a new chapter would feed our souls. But this Friday, it all comes to an end. With the help of SAW co-creator Leigh Whannell, director Darren Lynn Bousman, and, of course, Jigsaw himself, actor Tobin Bell, I’m here to take you back through the franchise- and bring an end to the game that’s captivated us all… And oh yes, there will be blood.

I’m ashamed to admit this- but I missed the original SAW in theaters. I know, I know, but give me a break- I was a freshman in college and spent more time bar hopping than supporting my local AMC. I managed to catch it the one weekend I spent in my dorm, sick as a dog, and it played for 24 hours straight on our campus movie channel.

I watched it twelve times that weekend. Back to back to back… you get the point.

I still can’t explain what it was that caught my attention. Maybe it was the bad florescent lighting, the mysterious dead body lying on the floor, or the fact that the dude from Robin Hood: Men in Tights took his own leg off with a jagged saw- whatever it was, it revamped my undeniable blood thirst. And I wasn’t alone. The original SAW film brought in over $55,000,000 at the box office. Not bad for a flick that a couple of guys from Australia pulled together on a leap of faith with just over a $1,000,000 budget.

Creation and Revelation

He doesn’t want us to cut through our chains. He wants us to cut through our feet.” Dr. Gordon- SAW (2004)

Saw

Long before Jigsaw fought for nightmare space with Freddy Krueger, the SAW franchise began as an idea, an idea that was nurtured by co-creators James Wan and Leigh Whannell during their years at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. “We both shared the same taste in films,” recalled Leigh during our lengthy (and fun, mind you) interview, “which was probably more main stream than some of our other fellow students. We were both into zombie films, and horror films, and big Hollywood action movies- and it was weird, in that particular school being main stream made us outcasts.” But it wasn’t until after film school was over that James and Leigh caught the true filmmaking bug- and a quick dose of reality. “We were living out the narrative that most ex-film students live out. You go to film school straight out of high school, as we did, and after it all ends you’re just sort of wandering. Once you get out of school you realize you don’t have that environment to nurture you anymore. That equipment, those cameras that are all just sitting there at your disposal, disappear and all of a sudden they have to be bought and paid for, or rented.

After watching the Blair Witch Project, James and Leigh had the inspiration they needed, even if they didn’t have the dough. “That really shook us up and made us realize that we’re probably going to have to [make a movie] ourselves with our own money. We were desperate to make something, anything, but had limited resources. We both worked at various jobs, but we just weren’t sure how we would get the money to make a film. That’s when doing it the Blair Witch way with just a video camera became our goal.

Saw

At the time, independently made films were starting to take off. Eager to jump on board, they threw around different ideas. Unfortunately, at the time, Australian funds weren’t being used to finance genre films. “We were stuck between a rock and a hard place because we didn’t have the money to do it ourselves and we felt like the people who did have the money weren’t approachable. It was a terrible position to be in.” But it was these parameters that helped narrow down what they could and could not do, ultimately giving birth to the love child that became SAW. “I feel like that decision by us, to not try and write a film that needed a million dollar budget or more, to try and make something for five to ten thousand dollars at most, it helped us focus on what the story would be. James and I said, OK, if we’re going to shoot a low budget film, it should take place in one room with not many actors. It was those restrictions that forced us to be more creative with what the film could be about.

With those conditions in mind, ideas were pitched back and forth. “I think at one stage, it was all going to be set in an elevator. The entire film was going to be shot from the point of view of the security camera.” Anyone who’s pursued anything creative knows that it’s all a process, and the materialization of SAW was no different. “When we would get together and talk about the film, it was like we were having a secret meeting. In a way, I guess we were.” Finally, after multiple discussions, it was James who set the wheels in motion. “One day James called me and threw around this idea. He said there are these two guys, and they’re in a room, chained to opposite sides of the room. And it’s a bathroom. And he said in the middle of the room, there’s a dead body, and they’re trying to figure out how they got into this room and who put them there. At the end of the film, they realize the person who put them there is the dead body- and he’s not dead, he’s alive, and he walks away.” Leigh admits to not necessarily giving James the monumental reaction he had been hoping for, but later it digressed into more than just a seemingly scant idea. “I’ll never forget that day. I remember hanging up the phone and started just going over it in my head, and without any sort of long period of pondering, I opened my diary that I had at the time and wrote the word SAW.” Neither had even mentioned a title when Leigh sketched out the word in a blood-red, dripping font. “It was one of those moments that made me aware that some things just really are meant to be. Some things are just waiting there to be discovered.

Saw

In time, James and Leigh brought the finished product to their manager, who thought the film would benefit more from a richer source of funding. It didn’t take long to convince the stubborn duo that this was the way to go. “There’s nothing like flattery, it will get you everywhere. We quickly went from militant, making the film for $5,000, to batting our eyelashes.” A Sydney-based producer optioned the film for a year, but when the deal fell through after the twelve month period, James and Leigh found themselves at a precipice. “It was heartbreaking to think that we were going to have to go back to square one.” That’s when the idea of taking it to Hollywood entered the picture. “For us it seemed crazy. We felt like America was just too big of a market, there was just too much product and if we couldn’t get it done in Australia, what were the chances of getting it done there? We were just another couple of guys with a script.” But they took a chance. They booked a flight, set up a meeting with an agent, and shot a scene from the script. “We picked the jaw trap scene. We got our friends together and shot it, put it on DVD. The DVD arrived to the agent like the day before we got there. He was over the moon about it. I think the DVD really changed things for us. A script is just an annoying pile of white pages you have to read, but a DVD really caught their attention.

By the end of the week, James and Leigh had made a deal with Twisted Pictures with James set to direct and Leigh promised the starring role of Adam. “For James and I, SAW began back in 1999 when we first watched Blair Witch. It was a long journey to get to the point where everything happened very quickly.

And as they say- the rest is history.

Jigsaw and His Tools

I don’t condone murder and I despise murderers.” John Kramer- SAW III (2006)

Saw

As simplistic as it may seem now, the bathroom scene was Jigsaw’s original trap (though chronologically there were others). Since the first film, there have been dozens of different tests, `puzzles’ if you will, that challenged our thought process and make us question Jigsaw’s thin line between right and wrong. In fact, Leigh compares the elements of those traps to the `would you rather’ game. “It taps into the human urge to sort of consider your options. I think that’s why it’s resonated so much with the public.

Anyone who has ever seen even one of the SAW films has a favorite trap in the back of their mind. For me, the one that sticks out will always be the pig grinder in SAW III. Why? Because it made me physically sick. I might be a self proclaimed gore whore, but there’s something about liquid swine that makes me ill. That’s the beauty of it- it sticks out because it tapped into my subconscious and fed off of my apparent fear of animal guts. My boyfriend, on the other hand, cringes every time Amanda Young (portrayed by Shawnee Smith) is thrown into the pit of needles in SAW II. It’s so simplistic, there’s very little blood, and yet there’s something about the thought of being poked and prodded that sends chills down your spine. “One of those things we tried with every SAW film is to make them somewhat relatable,” said Darren Lynn Bousman, the director I hold responsible for my gut reaction. “They all start with a real fear.

No matter how you play it, those traps wouldn’t exist without the franchise’s central most character, the monster behind it all. The one who sought salvation and in the end became one of the most prolific serial killers of our time, John Kramer- most commonly referred to as Jigsaw. “One of the nice things about John Kramer is that you knew nothing about him in the beginning except for what James and Leigh wrote in SAW,” recalled actor Tobin Bell, the man who, for the past seven years, has portrayed Jigsaw in such a way that just a tinge of his voice invokes fear. The most primal memory of Jigsaw is the body on the floor, and while all of us know now what makes him tick (for the most part), it’s the end scene where he rises from the dead and leaves Adam in the darkened bathroom that enters our minds. “I did SAW because I thought it was a fascinating location for a film to be made. These guys locked in a room, to me, was fresh. I did not anticipate the ending when I read the script, so I was quite caught by surprise and it was clear to me that if the filmmakers shot the scene well, the audience would be caught by surprise as well. The film was worth doing for that moment alone.

Saw

Believe it or not- in the beginning, there was no John Kramer, let alone his complicated alter ago. “It was months after we came up with the central idea that I came up with the idea for Jigsaw,” recalled Leigh, who had never written a feature-length screenplay prior to SAW. “Was it a revenge game? Is it a serial killer? It was through that process of trying to figure out why these guys were in the room that I came up with the idea for Jigsaw.” Despite his lack of dialogue in the original film, Tobin feels strongly about Jigsaw’s initial presence. “I learned a long time ago, it doesn’t matter how much you say. It’s the position you occupy in the piece. Though my character had precious little to say, he was very central. He was the focus on which the seesaw operated. I liked the strength in silence.

During a time when he was experiencing persistent migraines, Leigh began to weigh in on the `what-ifs,’ creating an initial motive. “They sent me in for an MRI and I started to think about what it would really be like if the doctor called and said hey, you have a tumor. It’s something that happens every day. Right now while we’re having this conversation, there’s a doctor somewhere telling someone you’re terminal, you’re going to die.” This thought unveiled the tip of an everlasting iceberg. “The mistreatment of the terminally ill by the medical community is very clear in SAW,” recalled Tobin.

In the sequels, however, Jigsaw had plenty to say. “They’ve taken the story so much further after the fact,” said Leigh. “We weren’t thinking about that when we were creating the first film.

Saw

Between the blows being delivered by Detective Eric Matthews (played by Donnie Wahlberg) to an ailing John Kramer, SAW II was the first to dig into the mythology of Jigsaw, which has since spanned over the remaining films. “I have a special place in my heart for SAW II because this was the first film that you really got a look at who John Kramer was,” said Tobin. “It was kind of a break for me and helped to springboard the SAW story forward.” And it didn’t stop there. With each new SAW film, the tumultuous world of Jigsaw has made us almost feel sorry for him, making us hate those who have everything but appreciate nothing. Even in death, his immortality lives, continuing in its castration of the unappreciative human race.

From the first film to the last, Tobin has made his character into something more than an engineering genius with a bag of tricks. “Tobin Bell is such an amazing actor,” boasted Darren. “He continually thought to add more depth to his character. He continually thought, how can I make this character deeper than we’ve seen him thus far?” Darren spent countless hours working with Tobin on the development of Jigsaw’s mythology. “He’s a perfectionist. He does not accept mediocrity. I can’t begin to tell you how many dinners that I had- 10, 12 hour sit down conversations with Tobin where he called bullshit. He would call bullshit on things that weren’t real or didn’t make sense. Those times when he called bullshit, it made the film what it was. If he would have just accepted what was put in front of him, we could have gotten cliché, we could have gotten generic, but he didn’t.” Darren went on to give Tobin more than just screen credit. “He is the backbone of the franchise. He is one of the reasons why the films are so successful.

I think the puppet on the tricycle may disagree. But then again, I wouldn’t want to challenge Jigsaw- would you?

Bousman’s Mark

By creating a legacy, by living a life worth remembering, you become immortal.” Amanda- SAW II (2005)

Saw

When Darren was tapped to make his feature screenplay The Desperate a reality, the last thing he expected was to be at the helm of the highly anticipated SAW sequel, let alone the third and fourth installments. “Originally, I wasn’t going to direct SAW II. I was going to direct The Desperate. But when they started testing SAW at all of these screenings and creating a sort of buzz and a stronger word of mouth that was when [my film] turned into SAW II.” The Desperate was a project close to Darren’s heart because “it was how I was feeling at the time, my life, my career, everything. It was based on my own desperation.” In fact, The Desperate was supposed to be its own film, a follow-up, if you will, to the original SAW. “When SAW became successful, they were like, well, wait a minute. We could turn this into the sequel.

Though it was somewhat heartbreaking to watch the script he had spent years creating slowly morph into what would become SAW II in October of 2005, he has no regrets. “In retrospect, it’s the best thing I ever did. Agreeing to make The Desperate into SAW II was a gamble. No one had any idea SAW was going to be as big as it was. Now, it’s the best thing I ever did- and it’s because of that I’m now a part of this huge franchise.

Darren also stayed on for both SAW III and SAW IV, blending his filmmaking talent with Jigsaw’s twisted world to create an incomparable continuation. The challenge with the SAW series became making them all link together in some way, a challenge that Darren welcomed with open arms. “Everyone who’s been involved with SAW loved the idea of the horrific nature of these movies. We all loved it. I think that our love and passion kind of shined through. It came to a place where we were as excited as the audience hopefully would be when they saw the movie.” And excited they were, which of the films grossing millions and millions of dollars when it was all said and done.

Obviously he was doing something right.

Saw

The first film started a chain reaction of detailed, twisted follow ups that Darren took and made his own. With SAW II, as previously mentioned, it was when the audience first had the opportunity to get a real look at who John Kramer was. In SAW III, the game became more complex. “SAW III was probably a bigger high for me because, at that point, I did it again. I thought that maybe SAW II was just a novelty that people just wanted to see what could happen with the second. Having the third film be successful again, that was amazing.” John Kramer, now on his death bed, forces a doctor by the name of Lynn (played by Bahar Soomekh) to keep him alive while test subject Jeff (played by Angus Macfadyen) completes a series of `forgiveness’ tests. But it’s that ending the SAW films have become famous for, where we discover that the doctor is married to the test subject, and the real test is actually for Amanda, that left us breathless. “I would say it’s a more emotional film. It kind of blended the SAW violence with back stories. It was also a very well thought out film. It was violent, it was crazy.

SAW III was also a challenge when it came to getting past the ratings board. “There’s governing bodies for everything we do in life. With food, with medication, with politics with everything- and with movies, they have a governing body that decides what is acceptable and unacceptable. Part of me completely disagrees with the MPAA, but I understand their purpose. I don’t have any kids, but if I had a seven year old kid I wouldn’t want [him] going to see SAW. With that being said, it is also extremely hard to hear that I’m going to get an NC-17 when I didn’t think it was any worse than the other stuff out there.

Darren’s SAW connection ended with SAW IV in 2007. Jigsaw and Amanda are both dead, but when a tape is discovered during Jigsaw’s autopsy, the game begins. Detective Matthews is alive, and Riggs (played by Lyriq Bent) has to follow his own set of tests in order to save both Matthews, and Detective Hoffman (played by Costas Mandylor). As Agent Strahm (played by Scott Patterson) and his partner, Agent Perez (played by Athena Karkanis) begin their own investigation, they discover through John Kramer’s estranged wife Jill (played by Betsy Russell) even more secrets, and another twist- the fact that Detective Hoffman isn’t who he appears to be.

I don’t know if there was anything I could have done that I didn’t already do with the first three,” said Darren. “It became safe. And when it became safe, I knew it was time to move on.

The Final Chapters

You think it’s the living who have ultimate judgment over you, because the dead will have no claim over your soul. But you may be mistaken.” Jigsaw- SAW VI (2009)

James Wan, Darren Bousman Kevin Hackl

Rounding out his SAW career with the fourth film, Darren stepped down, giving an opportunity for other members of the SAW family to add their touch to the franchise. That’s when directors David Hackl (SAW V), who had been involved since SAW II in 2006, and Kevin Greutert (SAW VI and SAW 3D), an editor since SAW in 2004, took over, leaving their mark.

And finally, you can’t mention SAW without crediting screenwriting duo Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan who stepped up to the plate after the third film, helping the new directors take a completely different, tasteful, and somewhat beautiful direction. With the fourth film rounding out the Detective Matthews saga, the fifth and sixth films then focus on Detective Hoffman, following his own quest to make a mark as the now unchallenged Jigsaw killer. By the end of the sixth film, Jill believes that he’s left for dead, the product of one of her husband’s many traps, but instead, he escapes- which leads to an obvious, much awaited power struggle in the final film, SAW 3D, which I will be watching alongside the rest of you this weekend.

Leigh has nothing but high hopes for the grand finale. “I just hope that people will like the last one and that someone will come up with something new that people will love.

Closure

Vengeance changes a person. It can make them realize what they’re capable of.” Jigsaw- SAW V (2008)

It’s an honor,” said Darren when I asked him about his mark on SAW. “To be a part of something that so many people have responded to and has spawned so many sequels and has launched other filmmakers’ careers as well, it’s great. It’s great to be a part of it.

SAW has many fathers, but this thing began in a bedroom in the outer suburbs of Melbourne, Australia,” said Leigh, who is very modest when it comes to his success. “It’s incredible; it’s amazing to think that something that James and I created is now a part of the cultural conversation.

It’s been such a successful series,” said Tobin. “There’s so much energy around it, that’s always a great thing. I’ve appreciated being a part of it. I’ve gotten to know a lot about horror fans and how enthusiastic they are, in a way that a lot of fans aren’t as interested in other genres. That part of it has been great; it’s been a real revelation to me.” He went on to say that “anytime you can be a part of something that successful, it’s always a great experience- certainly a different experience. A very special one.

I think one of the biggest concerns is what’s next? What will become the new SAW? “I wish and I hope that more films come out that continue to take risks,” finished Darren. “Movies, in my mind, are great when they take risks.

After all, if it wasn’t for two guys who took a risk, SAW wouldn’t even exist.

And what better way to end the franchise the way it began- with two simple words that have since been uttered by many characters, in different films, facing different puzzles masterminded by one of the most intelligent serial killers around. If it hasn’t crossed your mind yet, let me spell it out for you-

GAME OVER.

Saw

Interviews

“Be Not Afraid”: Andrea Perron Shares the Chilling True Story Behind ‘The Conjuring’ [Interview]

Published

on

Pictured: 'The Conjuring'

Welcome back to DEAD Time. I hope you left a light on for me because this month we’re going inside The Conjuring house to find out the real story of what happened to Carol and Roger Perron when they moved their five daughters into a house in Burrillville, Rhode Island in the early 1970s.

In 2013, director James Wan unleashed the terrifying horror film The Conjuring, which was based on the case files of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren and told the story of a family tormented by a demonic force after moving into their new home. In real life, the Warrens did investigate the activity in the Perron home, but the story goes a bit differently. You may think you know what really happened inside that house based on the horror movie alone, but you would be mistaken. The true story is much, much scarier.

Bloody Disgusting was delighted to have the opportunity to chat with Andrea Perron, the oldest of the five Perron daughters, who was witness to the paranormal activity in the family’s home. Andrea is a lecturer and the author of the trilogy of books, House of Darkness House of Light, which tells the story of what her family experienced while living in the house in Rhode Island for a decade. Read on for our exclusive interview.


Bloody Disgusting: Your family moved into the old Arnold Estate in 1970, correct? How long after you moved into the house did your family begin to experience unusual activity?

Andrea Perron: We bought the house in December of 1970, but we didn’t move in right away because my mother didn’t want to move during Christmas. My mother found the farm for sale and our family went to the farm a number of times and we loved it and we all felt like it was home to us. It was an original colonial home and a farm and 200 acres of land it was a big deal. My parents paid $72,000 for the house and back in 1970 that was a lot of money. All of the times we visited the house with Mr. Kenyon, who was the owner, none of us remembered having anything strange or otherworldly or mystical happen. We just enjoyed the property and the land, and the place itself was just so incredibly enticing. None of us have any memory of seeing anything strange or weird there until the day we moved in. It was as though the spirits were all just holding their breath [laughs] waiting for us to get there and live there.

The first thing that happened was my father opened up the back of the moving truck and handed me a box. We were in the middle of a snow and sleet and ice event, and the wind was whipping around, and it was freezing cold. I went into the nearest door with the box that was marked kitchen and my mother had already come in with my baby sister April and had gone into the kitchen. April was only five, she was too young to help unpack or help unload boxes, so she just stayed with mom. I walked into the parlor and took a right into the living room and Mr. Kenyon was packing a box of his wife’s china. I stopped and started chatting with him and then I picked up the box and turned to go into the kitchen through the front foyer, and there was a man standing there that I thought was oddly dressed. He seemed like flesh and blood to me to the extent that as I walked past him, I said, “Good morning, sir.” I didn’t see him when I walked into the room, but he was standing in the corner of the door when I picked up the box. So, I walked into the kitchen, and I remember asking my mother who that man was with Mr. Kenyon. Her response was, “There’s nobody with Mr. Kenyon. His son is on the way, but he’s not here yet.” So, I’m sure at the age of twelve, I assumed that a neighbor had stopped by, and my mom didn’t know it.

I went back outside to the moving van and meanwhile, my sister Christine walked in, and she saw him and walked into the kitchen and asked my mom the same question. Mom was busy; she had discovered that Mr. Kenyon had not packed anything in the kitchen. So, Christine asked who the man was. Then my sister Cindy walked through with her box, and she saw him and asked mom about the man that was with Mr. Kenyon and made some comment that he was dressed funny. Then Nancy walked in behind Cindy and said, “Cindy, did you see that man with Mr. Kenyon? I did, but he just disappeared.” That was our introduction to the farm, and it all happened within the first five minutes. Right before he left, Mr. Kenyon asked my father to go for a walk with him. He said to my father, “Roger, for the sake of your family, leave the lights on at night.” My father didn’t know how to interpret that statement. In his mind, Mr. Kenyon was saying that we were moving into a new house with one bathroom on the first floor and the girls would be sleeping upstairs, and that he should leave lights on, so the kids don’t go tumbling down the stairs in the middle of the night. That’s how he interpreted what Mr. Kenyon said to him. Over the first few months we were living there, we were told by various people in the area that there was never a time when it was dark outside that every light in the house would not be on.

BD: I read that you described the house as “a portal cleverly disguised as a farmhouse.” What led you to believe the house was a portal?

AP: It wasn’t just the house, it’s the property. The barn is as active as the house is. And the property is as active as both the house and the barn. There’s an awful lot of elemental activity. There’s tons of extraterrestrial activity there. And I think it has something to do with the fact that the farm is built on top of an ancient river which was lost during the last Ice Age. It’s known as the Lost River of New Hampshire, but it actually runs all the way underground. It’s buried about 700 feet underground. And on certain days when the water is very heightened and rushing, you can actually feel the vibration of it in the land. And you can lay on the stone walls and feel the stones vibrating from the river rushing underneath our feet. And it goes directly underneath the farm, but also there are two creeks or tributaries to the Nipmuc River, which runs right along the bottom of the property just beyond the stone wall that marks the backyard. So, the river is maybe 700 or 800 yards away.

I think it has something to do with all the water that it is surrounded by. Somebody sent me a drone shot of the farm from high enough up that it was probably, the drone was probably at least 3,000 feet. And it was the most interesting photograph that I have ever seen of the farm because from the angle that the shot was taken directly over it, it looks like a pyramid in the middle of a forest.

BD: Do you have an idea of how many spirits or entities you were dealing with in the house?

AP: Well, I can tell you that there were at least a dozen of them that we were very familiar with that we saw over and over and over again. Another interesting thing too is that the, none of us had any fear of this spirit that we saw that first day moving in. It was, it was not that kind of a vibe at all. In fact, he appeared to be very sweet-natured and cheerful, and he was really focused on Mr. Kenyon. But within the first couple of nights that we lived there, my sister Cindy came crawling into bed with me and she was obviously upset. She was only eight years old and asked if she could sleep with me. And I said, “Of course.” Then I pulled back the quilt and she hopped down.

I’m like, “What’s wrong?” And she said that she could hear voices in her room. Well, the upstairs of the house, every door opens into the next bedroom. And we had all of the doors open because the house was cold and that was the way, you know, to keep the heat moving instead of being trapped in one room or the other. And it was a new house to us even though it was 250 years old. And so, we always left the doors open between our bedrooms. And when she came in, she kept saying, “I hear voices. There’s voices in the room and I’m scared and it got louder and louder. I can’t believe you didn’t hear it.” I can’t believe it didn’t wake you up.” And at first, she was at that time sharing a room with Christine. And my sister Christine has a tendency to talk in her sleep from time to time.

So, I think I just assumed that Chris was doing that. And I asked her, and she said, “No, it’s not me.” She said, “It’s a whole bunch of voices and they’re all talking at the same time. And they’re all saying the same thing.” So naturally I asked her what they were saying, and her response was, “There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall. There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall” over and over and over. And she said all the voices were what you would describe as monotone, even though she did not use that word. She didn’t know that word at that time. But she said they all sounded the same. Like they were all talking together, and they all had basically the same voice. And they were all saying the same thing at the same time. And they were all around her bed to the point where the floorboards were shaking. The bed was shaking. And she put the pillow over her head to try to muffle the sound. And when it became so loud that she couldn’t tolerate it anymore, that’s when she jumped out of bed and ran into my room and got in bed with me. And about three years ago, the house, I mean, nothing could be buried in the walls of the house because the house is just clapboard with horsehair plaster. That’s it. There’s no insulation. There’s no, you know, there’s some eaves that go up under the roof line. But there’s just, there’s no place that bodies could have ever been stored or hidden.

So, it didn’t make any sense. But over the years other people speculated maybe there’s someone buried out near the retaining wall behind the house or down around the stone walls. And so, the previous owner, not the woman that owns it now, but the previous owners had some people come in with ground penetrating radar. And sure enough, they found seven distinct anomalies under the stone wall at the bottom of the property just before you go into the cow pasture. And because it is illegal to exhume anything in the state of Rhode Island, all they could do is offer the photographs as evidence. But there it is. There are seven distinct images that are buried just behind the stone wall on the side of the cow pasture. And that’s where they found whatever they found. But when you consider that that house was completed as it stands now in 1736, the property was originally deeded in 1680. And the house was finished as it is now 40 years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. And so, it really is truly an original colonial home. And it survived the Revolutionary War.

It survived the door rebellion. The King Phillips War, the Civil War. And at the time of the Civil War, the owners, and it was all through marriage. It was eight generations of one extended family that built and then lived in the South for hundreds of years. And we were the first outsiders. We have absolutely no familial attachment to the Richardson family or the Arnold family. And that house was passed through marriage because at that time women were not allowed to own property. So, through marriage it became the Arnold estate, but it actually is the Richardson Arnold homestead.

The Real ‘Conjuring’ House – Photo Credit: Visit Rhode Island

BD: At what point did Ed and Lorraine Warren become involved? There were a few things I read that made it sound like they just showed up at your house because they’d heard about the case.

AP: Yes, they really did. They just showed up at our house. Just one day they just showed up.

BD: So, your family had no idea they were coming?

AP: Well, it’s actually a little bit more complicated than that. We’d already been there for about two and a half years. A group of college students came to the house. Keith Johnson and his twin brother, and some of their friends, were paranormal investigators. And Keith said that my mother had called him and asked him to come check the house out. And my mother said, “I never called anybody.” I never told anybody other than our closest friends about the activity in the house.” Our attorney, Sam, knew. Our babysitter, Kathy, knew. And my mother’s friend, Barbara, knew. And she can’t remember anybody else that she ever said a word to about it. It was a very taboo subject back then. And, yeah, nobody wanted to open Pandora’s box. It was way more than a can of worms. It was just not something that people would talk about except for some of my peers at school, kids that had grown up in that town and knew the reputation of the house, which we were never warned about before we moved in. But, you know, I guess the best way to look at this is that the college students that came, we will never know why they showed up. Keith said my mother called him.

My mother said, “I never called anybody.” But there was some reason, and this is a spirit thing. There is some reason that he was drawn to that house and brought his team and had such extraordinary experiences on the one afternoon that they spent there that he sought out. Ed and Lorraine Warren, he and his team sought them out. They were speaking. His team was from Rhode Island College, and the Warrens were doing a lecture in the fall of that year at the University of Rhode Island. And they told the Warrens about our predicament and where we lived and who we were. The Warrens came the night before Halloween in 1973. It was either the night before Halloween or the night after Halloween. When they showed up at the door, my mother let them in the house. It was freezing out and she offered them a cup of coffee and presumed that they were lost because the farm is very remote. And then they identified themselves. My mother had absolutely no idea who they were. She had never heard their names before. And Mrs. Warren walked over to our old black stove in the kitchen, and she put her hand over her eyes and her other hand on the corner of the stove and became very quiet. And she said, “I sense a malignant entity in this house. Her name is Bathsheba.” Now, Mrs. Warren knew absolutely nothing about the history of the house or the area. Nothing. And she plucked that name out of thin air.

Bathsheba Sherman never lived in that house. She lived at the Sherman farm, which was about a mile away. There were only a few homesteads in the area at that time. She was born in 1812 and she died in 1885. And there were stories that she was in that house and had an infant in her care and that the baby died. The autopsy revealed that a needle had been impaled at the base of its skull and it was ruled that the baby’s death was from convulsions. My mother only found one article about it and it was stored in the archives of Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. She read about an inquest in the town of Burillville, Rhode Island. So, there was apparently a hearing in the neighboring town of Gloucester. And apparently there was an inquest and Bathsheba was questioned by a judge about her involvement with the death of the child. And apparently, she was very convincing that she had absolutely nothing to do with it. So it never went to a jury. There was never a formal indictment. It was let go and she was dismissed from the inquest. But in the court of public opinion, this young woman who had just married Judson Sherman was tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. And there were all kinds of accusations and innuendos and rumors that circulated around her for years and years, all the years of her life, that she had something to do with it.

Oh my God, if you were to ever go there and just go to a few of the graveyards around that farm, you would stumble over one little, tiny gravestone after another after another. I mean, infant mortality rates were through the roof. And it was actually bad luck to name your baby before it reached one year old. And Bathsheba Sherman was by some, I guess, accused of practicing witchcraft. She was apparently a very beautiful woman and the other women in town were threatened by her. It was back in the time when folklore and old wives tales and the accusation of being a witch could get you killed up in San Luis, which was just like an hour north of where we were living. And had it been a little bit different time, she could have paid with her life for being accused of that. But instead, it was just a vicious rumor that circulated that she had killed the baby for making a deal with the devil for eternal youth and beauty. We listen to all of that now and say, “Well, that’s just stupid. You know, that’s just superstitious nonsense. The woman would not be buried in the middle of hallowed ground in the Riverside Cemetery in Harrisville next to her husband and all of her children had there been any proof that she was a practicing witch.” I will spend the rest of my life defending her because even though I don’t know for certain if she had anything to do with the death of that child, I don’t think it’s fair to accuse someone of murder unless you have some evidence as proof. And there was no evidence back then. There was no DNA. There was nothing. And so, I just don’t think that she had anything to do with that.

I think that it was a very unfair condemnation of her. But unfortunately, the Warrens were asking my mother to be able to do an investigation of the house. My mother told her what she knew about the history of the house. After Lorraine came up with that name, my mother said, “Well, I’ve been doing some historical research on this property and some surrounding properties in the area.” And she showed Lorraine her notebook that was filled with stories and birth certificates and death certificates. On her second or third visit, Mrs. Warren asked for the notebook, and it was filled with descriptions of the spirits in the house. It was filled with drawings of the spirits that my mother had seen. And Mrs. Warren asked if she could borrow that thick notebook of absolutely invaluable information. And she wanted to make Xerox copies of it, so it tells you what time in history that was. My mother begrudgingly handed it over to her with the promise that she would get it back. But she never did return it. Mrs. Warren kept it. It was our understanding that when the movie The Conjuring was made that that notebook was sold as part of her case files. And it’s gone. We never ever saw it again. My mother asked for it back.

My mother felt that it was part of her legacy to her children. Mrs. Warren perceived it to be a haunted item and didn’t think that it belonged in the house. So, she told my mother she would return it, but then she never did and like 15 years later, she sold it. A number of things that we had found on the property went missing when they came one night with their team. It was the night of the séance that they foisted upon my mother, insisting that she was being oppressed and that she was right on the verge of possession and if they didn’t intervene on her behalf at that point that she would be lost. That was the most horrible night of my life. I was 15 when that happened. And I remember it like it just happened. It was absolutely traumatizing. I suffer PTSD from it. I swear to you I do. It was just a few minutes, but in those few minutes, I saw the dark side of existence and that is why I choose deliberately to live in the light. I will never let anything that evil touch me. I never will.

The Warrens only came maybe five times over the course of about a year and a half. And the last time that they came was after the séance. And when my father threw them out of the house that night along with their entourage, they left that house with my mother unconscious on the parlor floor. They came back to see if she had survived that night because when they left that house, they didn’t know if she was dead or alive. It was horrible. I don’t want to disparage them. They can’t defend themselves. Mrs. Warren, I think her heart was in the right place. I mean, she was a collector of objects. Their paranormal museum didn’t make itself. Every investigation she ever did, she had something from that investigation that went into their paranormal museum. And I know people personally who’ve been through it and have seen items that disappeared from our house the night of the séance that are under glass in that museum now.

BD: Do you know if that notebook was in their paranormal museum?

AP: No, it never was. Not that I know of. No, that was kept separately.

BD: What were your interactions with the Warrens like during the times that they were doing their investigation?

AP: Mrs. Warren didn’t really have anything much to do with us, with the children. She kind of turned us over to Ed, and he’s the one that interviewed us individually. My little sister, April, had a friend, a spirit friend, up in the chimney closet between the first and second bedroom. And she wouldn’t tell them about him. And he had identified himself to her as Oliver Richardson. But she wouldn’t tell Ed about him because she was afraid that the Warrens would make him go away and she loved him. And she felt very protective of him. And he was basically the same age as she was in life when he died. So, they had a very strong connection that she was not willing to jeopardize by telling them anything about him. But the rest of us just spilled our guts. It was kind of cathartic. It was a relief to be able to talk about the activity in that house with someone who believed us.

The night that Mrs. Warren originally came to the house, Mrs. Warren told my mother that I was in the room. I was a witness to this conversation. And she told my mother that the reason, even though she had known about our predicament for a number of weeks, she decided that she and her husband would not come out to the house until Halloween was because she said that’s when the veil has thinned. And I remember my mother looking at her and then kind of not laughing because it was certainly not a laughing matter, but kind of this incredulous grunt came out of her like, well, and then she just looked at her and she said, “Well then, I guess every day is Halloween at this house and there is no veil. I don’t know what you’re talking about, this veil. There’s no veil here. We share this with a lot of spirits.” One of the things that my mother resented about the film The Conjuring—I understand why they did what they did. I get it. But what they tried to do is juxtapose the devout Roman Catholic paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, against the godless heathen parent family. You know, like we were, I won’t say pagan because pagan is a religion also, but that we didn’t have any connection to the church. And my mother took great exception to that. She didn’t even watch the film until it had been out on DVD for more than a year.

I thought that she would be very upset about the way she was represented in the film. Some of it she thought was just so ridiculous that it was not anything that she would bother to take exception to. But the one thing that she was really offended by was that our portrayal was that of a family that had no faith. And nothing could have been further from the truth. My father was born and raised in a staunch Catholic tradition as the eldest of six boys. Church was an integral part of his childhood and his family’s life. He went to parochial school, and he served as an altar boy for years of his youth. And when he graduated from high school, he went into the Navy with the intention of serving the country and then going immediately into seminary to become a priest. That’s what my father’s life plan was. And in the interim, he met my mother and fell in love. And so, the priesthood thing was out the window. But my mother, who he met in Georgia, was a Southern Baptist. And she had to convert to Catholicism in order to marry him. All of us were baptized and all of us made our first communion and all of us were raised in the Roman Catholic Church.

It was the second year, the second Easter that we were at the farm. April was seven years old, and we went to Easter Mass, and we filled our own pew. There were so many of us. And at the very end of Mass, the priest said, “and the father and the son and the Holy Ghost.” And April turned and just with her big blue eyes just looked up at my mother and she said in her big girl, outdoor voice, “See, Mom, God has ghosts just like we do.” And every single head in that church turned and looked at our family. And as we got up to leave, the priest followed us out and he came up to my father and he said, “Mr. Perron, I would appreciate it if you would take your family and worship elsewhere.” My father was so angry and so hurt that he felt abandoned by the religion that he had invested himself into his whole life. I have rarely seen my father cry and he cried on the way home that day. As we were all getting out of our big Pontiac Bonneville car, which we called the Catholic Mobile because it had room for seven plus luggage and the family dog, my mother said, “Girls, if you want to know God, go to the woods. Go to the woods.” We never ever went back to church again. Ever. Our family has never been together in a church ever since then.

BD: That’s awful for a priest to react that way to a child.

AP: The priest was afraid. He was afraid that he had that weird family from the old, haunted house up on Round Top Road in St. Patrick’s Parish. And that others might not come back to the parish if we were there. I was already in catechism classes to make my confirmation and, you know, all my friends were Catholics. Everybody went to St. Patrick’s. I would just go and kind of sit in the back of the class and all my peers were there who were getting ready to make their final confirmation into the church. It was the nuns who were teaching us. But one night, the priest was there, and he recognized me. And sure as hell, not a week later, my parents received a letter from the Bishop, who was the head of the diocese of Providence, informing my parents that I was not welcome in confirmation classes because I asked too many questions. That was it. There was something about living in that house that made you more faithful. And I found out very early on that when all hell was breaking loose in that house and there was a lot of negative energy swirling in the house, or I felt threatened or any of my sisters felt threatened, all you ever had to do was say, “Oh God, help me. “And it stopped instantly. Good conquers evil and love conquers fear. And hatred is not the opposite of love. Fear is the opposite of love and hatred is born of fear.

I believe in my heart that the Warrens had the best of intentions. 40 years later, when I saw Mrs. Warren again out in California when she and I had been invited to preview The Conjuring before it was released, she recognized me immediately and came and wrapped her arms around me. During those three days that we spent in California together, she told me that she and Ed were in over their heads the moment they crossed the threshold of that house. They just didn’t know it. She admitted terrible mistakes were made. They didn’t mean to stir up activity, but she was a bona fide clairvoyant. She had great abilities, and she didn’t always use them to their greatest good. And I think that that was because of her fascination but also her reverence and respect for spirits. She knew that spirits were real, but unfortunately, because of her sensing Bathsheba in the house, who was really only a neighbor—Her sense of that spirit’s presence is what changed everything. Because not only did she have a sense of her presence and we didn’t find out until five decades later that her husband, Judson Sherman, died on that property. We still don’t know how he died. One of my historian friends dug up that he died at the Arnold state. We don’t know how, but that would explain why her presence would be there. You know, spirits are free to come and go as they please.

They’re not locked into an earthbound, specific location. There are differences of opinion even within our own family about how free the spirits are. My sister Cindy will still argue with me about it. She believes that they’re attached to the farm because she said that when we moved, they loved us so much that if they could have come with us, they would have. My response to her is that the spirit that was standing behind Nancy on the front porch of that house the day the whole rest of the family left for Georgia was the spirit that was standing behind my sister Cindy when we arrived at the new house in Georgia. Same exact woman; same entity standing right behind her. And Cindy’s like, “No, no, it must have been somebody else. It must have been one of my guides because the spirits are stuck there. They’re trapped there. And I’m like, “No, they’re not, babe.”

‘The Conjuring’ Movie House – Photo Credit: J. Patrick Swope

BD: How much of what we see in The Conjuring really happened?

AP: There are so many discrepancies between The Conjuring and the real story that is documented in House of Darkness House of Light, the trilogy of books that I wrote that they are unrecognizable except for the names. Everybody that was associated with the film read my books, including the actors, except for maybe the youngest children couldn’t read them. But everybody, all the adults for sure, read the books and said, “Oh, hell no, we can’t tell this story,” because they were about to invest somewhere between $25 and $30 million into making this film. And it was based predominantly on the case files of Ed and Lorraine Warren. It says right on the movie trailer, case files of Ed and Lorraine. But I gave them permission to use anything that was in my books that was the actual story, the authentic telling of our family memoir. And they wouldn’t. The screenwriters, Chad and Carey Hayes, twin brothers, lovely men, wanted desperately to include elements of the true story and they wrote some of the stories into the screenplay. And every single time the suits at New Line Cinema and Warner Brothers sent the script back and said, “Take that out, redact it. We’re not going to run people out of the theater. We’re not going to make a movie that nobody will stay to watch to the end because they are terrified.” So, The Conjuring is a very toned-down version of events.

BD: Why didn’t they want to use it?

AP: They thought it was too scary; it was too real; it was too raw. It was, I mean, people who read my trilogy of books are changed. They are never the same again. When they come up for air after that deep dive, they think about everything differently. Nothing is ever the same. A lot of my readers over the years have deemed it interactive literature. They feel like by the time they’re done reading volume three, that they lived there with us, that they grew up with us, that they know every member of my family intimately well, and that they had the same experiences that we did. There’s something about this story that unlocks a person’s third eye and opens them to the netherworld in a way that nothing else ever has or ever could. Actually, the ability to expand human consciousness is not the most important part of the trilogy. House of Darkness House of Light got its title from my mother when I was about 300 pages into the first book. And she asked me what I was going to title the trilogy, and I told her I didn’t know. And she stood next to me at her old cherry desk right here in the room in which I’m sitting speaking with you right now. I wrote those books in this house. And she just looked at me and she said, “House of Darkness House of Light,” it was both. No comma, it was both. And so, there is no comma. It’s House of Darkness House of Light as one thing because my mother believes the same way that I do; that everything is energy, and everything is consciousness, and everything is one thing.

There is no delineation between natural and supernatural, between normal and paranormal. At least there isn’t for us. This is just how our lives are now. That you cannot experience what we did immersed in that environment for a decade and be unchanged by it. And I think the greatest value in me finding the courage to finally tell our story more than, I didn’t even start writing it until more than three decades after we had left. But I finally got to an age and a place in my own mind where I didn’t care how people were going to react to it anymore. I knew that we would be scrutinized. I knew that we would be belittled. I knew that there would be mean-spirited people out there that would attack our family. And instead, we were embraced by the paranormal community worldwide.

I would not be one of the very best-selling authors in this genre worldwide had it not been for The Conjuring. So, I don’t hold any grudges. The power of a well-made feature film and the images that are placed in people’s minds is what causes them to dig deeper. And based on a true story, well where’s the true story? Who wrote the true story? All they have to do is Google the name Perron and up come the books. They’ve been read all over the world. Hundreds of thousands of copies have been sold. And they’re selling better now than they did after the film came out. So, the story is getting around. And I think that the great value of the story is not the expansion of human consciousness. It is liberating people to tell their own story. Because so many people have been touched by spirits and they’re afraid to share it. They’re afraid to speak out. They’re afraid to be criticized and to be treated as somehow less than. Or I’ve often been asked, “Was there ever a time that you questioned your own sanity?” Oh, hell yes. And that is true of every member of my family. We saw things in that house that there’s no plausible explanation other than spirits are real.

We’re still learning things about that house and about the spirits who quote unquote live there, who dwell there. And I love them. I even love the cranky ones. I do because to me it doesn’t even matter who they were, that they still are is a freaking miracle. That is magical. That is cosmic forces beyond our comprehension. One of my famous quotations is very simple, but it’s very true—To be touched by a spirit is not a curse, but a blessing. It is that rare glimpse into the realm from which we come and will all inevitably return. And I end it with, be not afraid.

Continue Reading