Connect with us

Interviews

[SXSW Interview] Robert Kirkman and Chris Black Talk “Outcast”!

Published

on

Outcast Interview

Cinemax’s new series Outcast, based on the Robert Kirkman (The Walking Dead) graphic novel of the same name, had its world premiere at the 30th annual SXSW Music, Film and Interactive Conferences and Festivals. While I wasn’t able to catch the premiere due to scheduling issues (I chose to interview James Caan instead), I was able to interview series creator and author Robert Kirkman and showrunner/executive producer Chris Black. The interview took place at a press roundtable with me, Daily Dead writer Heather Wixson and Pajiba writer Kristy Puchko. We all took turns asking questions about the series and here is what Kirkman and Black had to say!

When did “Outcast” make the leap from comic to TV show?

Robert Kirkman: It was a fairly unique situation. Sharon Tal Yguado, who runs Fox International, heads up the international side of “Walking Dead.” So, outside of the U.S.,  “Walking Dead” is a Fox International show. It’s on all the Fox channels, and they do these really cool worldwide launches, where they launch their shows like a movie.

Chris Black: Like in 120 countries at the same time.

Kirkman: Yeah, all at once. And it’s great! So we were at some kind of “Walking Dead” event between seasons one and two, and she just casually was like, “Oh, what are you working on now? You got any new things you’re cooking up?” And I just kind of thought I was at a comic book convention, talking to a fellow comic professional. So, I’m like, “Oh you know, I’ve got this thing I’m doing, it’s about this guy Kyle Barnes. It’s a sort of an exorcism thing, but not really. And it’s got some cool elements to it. And this and that and blah blah blah.” And she kind of interrupted me and went, “Well, I’ll buy that.” And I don’t know what that’s all about. And then the next day my people–as they say–called me up, “We got this deal from Fox International. What did you say? What’s going on?”

Black: “What did you tell her!? What did you promise?”

Kirkman: Yeah, yeah. And so even before I had even developed it much as a comic, I just casually sold it! Which was very strange.

How did that inform writing the comic, knowing it was going to be a show?

Kirkman: From then I was just left to my own devices to do what I normally do. So I started developing it as a comic book while starting to write it as a pilot. So, it was weird because I was writing them both concurrently. So there’d be time where I would writing the comic and I would say, “Okay I want to do this scene, but I only have four pages to do this scene. So, I’m going to have to take this element and this element out.” And then on the pilot script side, I could put that stuff in. So there were things where scenes ended up being very different just because there are things that work really well in comics and things that work very well in TV, and those are not the same things. It was pretty cool.

So they are in the same vein, but very particular to their media.

Kirkman: Right. Just the fact that there’s motion and sound (in television), it took me a long time on “Walking Dead” to get used to the fact that in television characters don’t have to say things. In comics, people have to say “I feel this way” or “I want to do this.” (In TV) you can do so much with gesture and movement and facial expressions. Sometimes you can do stuff with facial expressions in comics, but you can do so much more if somebody can move around without actually speaking. So that leads to a different style of writing between the two mediums.

We’ve seen a lot of possession stuff in horror the last five or ten years. Is that the biggest challenge in going into a project like this, finding a way to make it fresh, make it new, make it exciting for people?

Kirkman: Yeah, that’s a great challenge that we knew going into it. I feel like we rose to the challenge greatly in the first season and going forward. Knock on wood I guess. But going into it, we knew that like zombie genre, this is very well-worn. There have been dozens of movies based on this subject matter. We know what the audience expects from these stories, and I’m very excited to say that we’re not doing any of that. We’re taking a very different tract with this storyline and we’re doing very cool, very different things. We’re very much looking at this like it’s a solvable problem. I don’t think anybody has really every handled exorcism in the way that we have. Most exorcism movies you watch, somebody calls in a priest. The priest comes in the house, he’s like “I know what to do here! This guy’s got a demon in him!” And he takes the demon out, and he goes, “Alright, well, I’m going to go home. You guys have a good time.” And that’s the movie.

Black: Done and done!

That’s the nicest explanation of “The Exorcist” I’ve ever heard!

Kirkman: Well there ya’ go! And watching those movies, I always thought you don’t tell them how to keep them from happening again, and you don’t do any work to figure out why it happened or if it can be prevented or if it can be stopped or if you can make it so this doesn’t happen to anyone ever again. The fact that the priests in these movies are like “Well, it’s going to happen again and I’m going to get called and that’ll be great!” Is it job security? Is that what they’re after? I don’t really know.

Black: Here’s my card!

Kirkman: So, I don’t really know. Over the long form, this is a show that’s going to evolve. The exorcisms are very different. The tactics the characters use in order exorcise the demons will evolve and change as they learn more, as they figure out what this phenomena actually entails, and they learn better how to address it. And this is over the course of many many seasons, somewhere between 10 and 100.

Black: Wait!

Kirkman: (Looking to Black) I’m not nailing it down. (To Black) You’ll be fine.

I like the hesitance of Chris’s “Wait!”

Black: (Re-acting with playfully bulging eyes) Wait, what!?

Kirkman: Okay, just fifty. But you know, we’ll actually be looking at the phenomenon of demonic possession as if it is a solvable problem. Could we actually get to that point? That’s something our characters are investigating.

I saw an interview where you, Robert, said that “Outcast” was one of the few things you’ve done where you knew the ending when you were writing it. So in terms of the show, does that apply to the first season or the series?

Kirkman: That would be the ending of the series.  The length of it varies. I don’t have it issue-to-issue blocked out for the life of the series, but I do know what I’m working towards. Chris and I have been able to talk about it. We know what the end game is for both the show and the comic. I know that I have to make Paul Azaceta, the artist on the comic, draw fast enough to where it happens fast enough to where  it happens in the comic before it happens in the show, so the show doesn’t spoil the comic. These are the things that keep me up at night.

Black: It’s not a competition.

So no “Game of Thrones” situation where the show catches up?

Kirkman: No, we don’t have to worry about anything like that.

You don’t read stories about G.R.R. Martin missing deadlines and have panic attacks?

Kirkman: No, no, no. Although he is a much better writer working on a much more complicated project, so I don’t consider myself to be in any competition with him, because I would lose.

Black: I think that knowing where you’re going is important. When Robert says that, it’s not like we know what every episode of the next four, five, six seasons of the show is going to be. But I think Matt Weiner knew how “Mad Men” was going to end. Vince Gilligan knew how “Breaking Bad” was going to end. Mark Cherry knew how “Desperate Housewives” was going to end. But along the way, the process is about crafting the stories. You don’t know what twists and turns that road is going to take that ultimately get you there. That’s the fun of it.

Kirkman: And we’re open to those twists and turns and those new things that come in. Hearing you say that, I realize what an idiot I sound like in an interview because I write comics, which is a very long form storytelling medium where you don’t necessarily have to have the end game in mind. Where anyone who writes a novel or a TV series or anything else definitely has to know what that ending is.

Black: Well the thing is–

Kirkman: (Jokingly cuts him off) You stop it! You stop.

Black: No, no wait–it is a new paradigm. It’s this new golden age.

Kirkman: Yeah, yeah.

Black: It didn’t used to be this way where you have dueling (versions). Like the guys who created “CSI” they just keep doing it week after week. You don’t have an endgame. It’s an episodic procedural, so you don’t need an endgame.

Kirkman: But I realize now most writers probably hear me go, “This is the first time I’ve ever had an ending in mind,” and think “What the hell is this guy’s problem?”

Black: But you know Vince always said the pitch for “Breaking Bad” was turning Mr. Chips into Scarface. I mean, he knewwhat the big arc of that show was.

But even that pitch is very vague, and you can work within that.

Black: Exactly.

Kirkman: Oh trust me, the ending of “Outcast” is very vague. (All chuckle.)

Black: As is just about everything in it, from the beginning to the ending.

Kirkman: (Playfully scolding) Hey, hey. Careful, it’s not that bad.

What kind of research did you do into exorcisms? Do you believe in exorcisms? Did you talk to people claiming to be exorcists?

Kirkman: I didn’t talk directly to an exorcist, but I do a lot of reading. There’s actually a lot of cool Youtube videos of exorcisms, which is kind of interesting.

That’s a rabbit hole I don’t need to go down!

Kirkman: No no no!

Black: It’s a very deep hole.

Kirkman: But you know, between that kind of stuff–one thing we’re doing with this show is that it’s not Catholicism. This isn’t the standard “we have our rules” thing.

Black: It’s very ritualized in the Catholic church.

Kirkman: Yeah. We’re coming at this from a Baptist religion and there are Baptist exorcists that do work, and they do things a little bit differently. So I had to do a little bit of research into that, and what the ins and outs of that are.

What’s example of how a Baptist exorcist approaches this differently than a Catholic?

Kirkman: It’s a little more energetic. It’s got a bit more panache, I guess is the best way to put it. In Catholicism, the power is in the totems, the crosses and things like that. Baptists, it’s more like the guy himself is empowered.

Black: I think it also goes to the larger idea of the specific exorcisms and the arc of exorcisms is that our characters have to be a little more agile in terms of “okay this didn’t work, I have to try something else,” as opposed to traditional Roman Catholic exorcism where the rite of exorcism is very  you do this, you do this, you do this. With our guys, it’s a little more like we’re going in there and no battle plan lasts beyond the firing of the first shot. It all goes to hell and they’re like “We’ve got to do something different.” And that’s going to play out over the mythology, them needing to make adjustments, learning what works and what doesn’t.

Kirkman: It’s very much a case of two people figuring out their craft.

Black: Exactly.

I’m curious how much does the idea of faith play into the story? Are we going to see Patrick’s character dealing with his own crisis of faith?

Kirkman: The majority of how we address faith in the story is through Reverend Anderson (played by Philip Glenister), because he is a Baptist preacher. Patrick (Fugit)’s character Kyle is secular, so he doesn’t really believe in the stuff that he’s experiencing. Which I think is a fun dynamic and a good place to have that character in. As the series progresses, Anderson will see Kyle’s side of things, and sometimes Kyle will see Anderson’s side of things. That’s a good interplay between them. But also I think we try not to take a stance. There is no “this is the way religion is” or “this is the way you should believe.” We try to keep things open to interpretation as much as possible. We don’t ever want to come off like this show is preaching or evangelizing in any way.

Black: It’s very important to us that the show not cast judgment. They are people who believe this. And it’s important that within the context of our show, that the people–with Reverend Anderson as our starting point–that the people who resolutely have faith are not being looked down upon, not being written down to, not being mocked.

Kirkman: And that’s something that happens often in television, especially in modern television, where the religious character is not respected or is played for comedic effect or something like that. That’s definitely something that we are avoiding in significant ways.

Can you talk about the boundaries you’ll be pushing as a Cinemax series?

Kirkman: Yes. (To Black) Do you want to riff on that a minute?

Black: Yeah. Well, look, it is nice to not be held back by broadcast standards and practices. I’ve done a lot of broadcast network television where it’s like sometimes the limitations seem insane. To really be in terms of violence, where it’s about the graphic nature of the violence, or sex, well there’s not a ton of sex on our show, or cursing. We can do all of that (on Cinemax), but to me those aren’t the boundaries that are fun to push, it’s storytelling boundaries. It’s telling stories that would make a broadcast network executive go “We can’t have our main character do that. That’d be too much. You’ll offend people. They’ll betoo shocked. You’re damaging this character in a way we can’t get him back from, that we’re not going to allow that kind of storytelling.” At a premium cable channel, they’re like “Great! That sounds like a bold choice. Let’s do that.” So to me, that’s the what’s truly liberating about working for a place like Cinemax, even more so than we can show as much nudity and gore as we want.

(Jokingly) So that’s our headline: “Outcast” Promises You Nudity And Gore.

Black:  We promise you boobs and then deliver on the daring storytelling.

Kirkman: This is not a sexy show at all.

That’s the tagline: We lure you in with boobs…

Kirkman: Well, alright,

Black: Robert is like, “This suddenly took a turn I wasn’t expecting.”

Kirkman: There’s going to be a lot of disappointed people when they watch this show.

Like “Where are the boobs!?”

Black: This is Cinemax! What the hell?

Kirkman: Yeah.

So when it came to casting , did you have any input? Where you concerned at all about how might things might go over?

Kirkman: Casting was actually a unique challenge because the character of Kyle Barnes, he’s an evolving character. He starts in one place, and over the course of the first season and beyond, he moves into other areas. So just looking at the pilot as a slice, you don’t really get a full sense of where this character is going to go. So we had a problem with actors when we were doing casting that had a very, very extremely dark take on who Kyle Barnes was.

Black: And angry.

Kirkman: And angry, as is a fairly good of assessment as he is in the pilot. But we needed somebody who could do the pilot and also move into the areas we knew we were going to be moving into. It took a long time to find Patrick, someone who from minute one was doing the scenes that we were testing people with with a lightness to him. There was something engaging about him.

Black: He brought a humanity.

Kirkman: Yeah!

Black: There was a real empathy to him that you weren’t put off by, but drawn in by.

So when auditioning for that role did you only do scenes from the pilot, or did you sketch out sides that may not necessarily be in the series but give those later inklings?

 Kirkman: We did a lot of Kyle and Anderson scenes and Kyle and Megan scenes. The Kyle and Anderson scene especially ended up being in a later episode.

Black: Well, you wrote some additional scenes with Kyle and Alison, because Alison didn’t appear as a speaking role in the pilot.

Kirkman: Yes.

Black: Kyle and his ex-wife Alison are separated, so Robert wrote some extra scenes for that that we had (to audition people with).

Kirkman: Yeah, and we wanted to see people interacting. And there are characters who don’t interact in the pilot, who will be later in the series. So, you know we wanted to be sure we had all of our i’s dotted and t’s crossed.

Black: But pretty much we knew when Patrick walked through the door. The first scene he read, we were like, “Okay, that’s him.”

Kirkman: Yeah. And honestly it was the same with Wrenn Schmidt and Philip. Black: Wrenn Schmidt who plays Megan), Philip Glenister, who plays Reverend Anderson, it’s a wonderful cast. And we spent a lot of time in the casting process there, and Robert was there–

Kirkman: I was there more than I wanted to be!

Black: We went through scores of video taped submissions and sat in a room with actor after actor.

Kirkman: And honestly, Gabriel Bateman, who plays Joshua in the pilot and possibly–I don’t want to spoil anything–shows up later in the show too, that was a very involved casting process, because we had to find a nine-year-old boy that could do all of the things.

What is the audition like when you’re asking a nine-year-old to play a possessed kid?

Kirkman: With Gabriel Bateman it was amazing. A lot of times we would get the kids to come in. And I would tell Chris, “I’m watching them come into the room and when they leave to see how different they are when they are acting.” Because a lot the times, the kid would come in and be comfortable and be a normal kid, and then they do the audition and they were very stiff and not great. And so you wanted a kid that could keep that throughout. But Gabriel came in and was like a little adult. It was very strange and very off-putting in ways we really liked. He would go over to Patrick and say, “I’m going to say this now because I have a demon inside of me. And this is how I’m going to do this.” And he was like, “Okay, great. Let’s do this.” He understood so much nuance to the role that was really remarkable for a kid of his age. I think he is really going to go places. I think he’s got an amazing future.

Black: He’s terrifically talented. And when you get over to the other table, ask Patrick that exact same question.

Kirkman: Patrick has a lot of great stories about Gabriel, yeah.

Check out Outcast when it premieres on Cinemax on June 3, 2016!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Interviews

“Be Not Afraid”: Andrea Perron Shares the Chilling True Story Behind ‘The Conjuring’ [Interview]

Published

on

Pictured: 'The Conjuring'

Welcome back to DEAD Time. I hope you left a light on for me because this month we’re going inside The Conjuring house to find out the real story of what happened to Carol and Roger Perron when they moved their five daughters into a house in Burrillville, Rhode Island in the early 1970s.

In 2013, director James Wan unleashed the terrifying horror film The Conjuring, which was based on the case files of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren and told the story of a family tormented by a demonic force after moving into their new home. In real life, the Warrens did investigate the activity in the Perron home, but the story goes a bit differently. You may think you know what really happened inside that house based on the horror movie alone, but you would be mistaken. The true story is much, much scarier.

Bloody Disgusting was delighted to have the opportunity to chat with Andrea Perron, the oldest of the five Perron daughters, who was witness to the paranormal activity in the family’s home. Andrea is a lecturer and the author of the trilogy of books, House of Darkness House of Light, which tells the story of what her family experienced while living in the house in Rhode Island for a decade. Read on for our exclusive interview.


Bloody Disgusting: Your family moved into the old Arnold Estate in 1970, correct? How long after you moved into the house did your family begin to experience unusual activity?

Andrea Perron: We bought the house in December of 1970, but we didn’t move in right away because my mother didn’t want to move during Christmas. My mother found the farm for sale and our family went to the farm a number of times and we loved it and we all felt like it was home to us. It was an original colonial home and a farm and 200 acres of land it was a big deal. My parents paid $72,000 for the house and back in 1970 that was a lot of money. All of the times we visited the house with Mr. Kenyon, who was the owner, none of us remembered having anything strange or otherworldly or mystical happen. We just enjoyed the property and the land, and the place itself was just so incredibly enticing. None of us have any memory of seeing anything strange or weird there until the day we moved in. It was as though the spirits were all just holding their breath [laughs] waiting for us to get there and live there.

The first thing that happened was my father opened up the back of the moving truck and handed me a box. We were in the middle of a snow and sleet and ice event, and the wind was whipping around, and it was freezing cold. I went into the nearest door with the box that was marked kitchen and my mother had already come in with my baby sister April and had gone into the kitchen. April was only five, she was too young to help unpack or help unload boxes, so she just stayed with mom. I walked into the parlor and took a right into the living room and Mr. Kenyon was packing a box of his wife’s china. I stopped and started chatting with him and then I picked up the box and turned to go into the kitchen through the front foyer, and there was a man standing there that I thought was oddly dressed. He seemed like flesh and blood to me to the extent that as I walked past him, I said, “Good morning, sir.” I didn’t see him when I walked into the room, but he was standing in the corner of the door when I picked up the box. So, I walked into the kitchen, and I remember asking my mother who that man was with Mr. Kenyon. Her response was, “There’s nobody with Mr. Kenyon. His son is on the way, but he’s not here yet.” So, I’m sure at the age of twelve, I assumed that a neighbor had stopped by, and my mom didn’t know it.

I went back outside to the moving van and meanwhile, my sister Christine walked in, and she saw him and walked into the kitchen and asked my mom the same question. Mom was busy; she had discovered that Mr. Kenyon had not packed anything in the kitchen. So, Christine asked who the man was. Then my sister Cindy walked through with her box, and she saw him and asked mom about the man that was with Mr. Kenyon and made some comment that he was dressed funny. Then Nancy walked in behind Cindy and said, “Cindy, did you see that man with Mr. Kenyon? I did, but he just disappeared.” That was our introduction to the farm, and it all happened within the first five minutes. Right before he left, Mr. Kenyon asked my father to go for a walk with him. He said to my father, “Roger, for the sake of your family, leave the lights on at night.” My father didn’t know how to interpret that statement. In his mind, Mr. Kenyon was saying that we were moving into a new house with one bathroom on the first floor and the girls would be sleeping upstairs, and that he should leave lights on, so the kids don’t go tumbling down the stairs in the middle of the night. That’s how he interpreted what Mr. Kenyon said to him. Over the first few months we were living there, we were told by various people in the area that there was never a time when it was dark outside that every light in the house would not be on.

BD: I read that you described the house as “a portal cleverly disguised as a farmhouse.” What led you to believe the house was a portal?

AP: It wasn’t just the house, it’s the property. The barn is as active as the house is. And the property is as active as both the house and the barn. There’s an awful lot of elemental activity. There’s tons of extraterrestrial activity there. And I think it has something to do with the fact that the farm is built on top of an ancient river which was lost during the last Ice Age. It’s known as the Lost River of New Hampshire, but it actually runs all the way underground. It’s buried about 700 feet underground. And on certain days when the water is very heightened and rushing, you can actually feel the vibration of it in the land. And you can lay on the stone walls and feel the stones vibrating from the river rushing underneath our feet. And it goes directly underneath the farm, but also there are two creeks or tributaries to the Nipmuc River, which runs right along the bottom of the property just beyond the stone wall that marks the backyard. So, the river is maybe 700 or 800 yards away.

I think it has something to do with all the water that it is surrounded by. Somebody sent me a drone shot of the farm from high enough up that it was probably, the drone was probably at least 3,000 feet. And it was the most interesting photograph that I have ever seen of the farm because from the angle that the shot was taken directly over it, it looks like a pyramid in the middle of a forest.

BD: Do you have an idea of how many spirits or entities you were dealing with in the house?

AP: Well, I can tell you that there were at least a dozen of them that we were very familiar with that we saw over and over and over again. Another interesting thing too is that the, none of us had any fear of this spirit that we saw that first day moving in. It was, it was not that kind of a vibe at all. In fact, he appeared to be very sweet-natured and cheerful, and he was really focused on Mr. Kenyon. But within the first couple of nights that we lived there, my sister Cindy came crawling into bed with me and she was obviously upset. She was only eight years old and asked if she could sleep with me. And I said, “Of course.” Then I pulled back the quilt and she hopped down.

I’m like, “What’s wrong?” And she said that she could hear voices in her room. Well, the upstairs of the house, every door opens into the next bedroom. And we had all of the doors open because the house was cold and that was the way, you know, to keep the heat moving instead of being trapped in one room or the other. And it was a new house to us even though it was 250 years old. And so, we always left the doors open between our bedrooms. And when she came in, she kept saying, “I hear voices. There’s voices in the room and I’m scared and it got louder and louder. I can’t believe you didn’t hear it.” I can’t believe it didn’t wake you up.” And at first, she was at that time sharing a room with Christine. And my sister Christine has a tendency to talk in her sleep from time to time.

So, I think I just assumed that Chris was doing that. And I asked her, and she said, “No, it’s not me.” She said, “It’s a whole bunch of voices and they’re all talking at the same time. And they’re all saying the same thing.” So naturally I asked her what they were saying, and her response was, “There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall. There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall” over and over and over. And she said all the voices were what you would describe as monotone, even though she did not use that word. She didn’t know that word at that time. But she said they all sounded the same. Like they were all talking together, and they all had basically the same voice. And they were all saying the same thing at the same time. And they were all around her bed to the point where the floorboards were shaking. The bed was shaking. And she put the pillow over her head to try to muffle the sound. And when it became so loud that she couldn’t tolerate it anymore, that’s when she jumped out of bed and ran into my room and got in bed with me. And about three years ago, the house, I mean, nothing could be buried in the walls of the house because the house is just clapboard with horsehair plaster. That’s it. There’s no insulation. There’s no, you know, there’s some eaves that go up under the roof line. But there’s just, there’s no place that bodies could have ever been stored or hidden.

So, it didn’t make any sense. But over the years other people speculated maybe there’s someone buried out near the retaining wall behind the house or down around the stone walls. And so, the previous owner, not the woman that owns it now, but the previous owners had some people come in with ground penetrating radar. And sure enough, they found seven distinct anomalies under the stone wall at the bottom of the property just before you go into the cow pasture. And because it is illegal to exhume anything in the state of Rhode Island, all they could do is offer the photographs as evidence. But there it is. There are seven distinct images that are buried just behind the stone wall on the side of the cow pasture. And that’s where they found whatever they found. But when you consider that that house was completed as it stands now in 1736, the property was originally deeded in 1680. And the house was finished as it is now 40 years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. And so, it really is truly an original colonial home. And it survived the Revolutionary War.

It survived the door rebellion. The King Phillips War, the Civil War. And at the time of the Civil War, the owners, and it was all through marriage. It was eight generations of one extended family that built and then lived in the South for hundreds of years. And we were the first outsiders. We have absolutely no familial attachment to the Richardson family or the Arnold family. And that house was passed through marriage because at that time women were not allowed to own property. So, through marriage it became the Arnold estate, but it actually is the Richardson Arnold homestead.

The Real ‘Conjuring’ House – Photo Credit: Visit Rhode Island

BD: At what point did Ed and Lorraine Warren become involved? There were a few things I read that made it sound like they just showed up at your house because they’d heard about the case.

AP: Yes, they really did. They just showed up at our house. Just one day they just showed up.

BD: So, your family had no idea they were coming?

AP: Well, it’s actually a little bit more complicated than that. We’d already been there for about two and a half years. A group of college students came to the house. Keith Johnson and his twin brother, and some of their friends, were paranormal investigators. And Keith said that my mother had called him and asked him to come check the house out. And my mother said, “I never called anybody.” I never told anybody other than our closest friends about the activity in the house.” Our attorney, Sam, knew. Our babysitter, Kathy, knew. And my mother’s friend, Barbara, knew. And she can’t remember anybody else that she ever said a word to about it. It was a very taboo subject back then. And, yeah, nobody wanted to open Pandora’s box. It was way more than a can of worms. It was just not something that people would talk about except for some of my peers at school, kids that had grown up in that town and knew the reputation of the house, which we were never warned about before we moved in. But, you know, I guess the best way to look at this is that the college students that came, we will never know why they showed up. Keith said my mother called him.

My mother said, “I never called anybody.” But there was some reason, and this is a spirit thing. There is some reason that he was drawn to that house and brought his team and had such extraordinary experiences on the one afternoon that they spent there that he sought out. Ed and Lorraine Warren, he and his team sought them out. They were speaking. His team was from Rhode Island College, and the Warrens were doing a lecture in the fall of that year at the University of Rhode Island. And they told the Warrens about our predicament and where we lived and who we were. The Warrens came the night before Halloween in 1973. It was either the night before Halloween or the night after Halloween. When they showed up at the door, my mother let them in the house. It was freezing out and she offered them a cup of coffee and presumed that they were lost because the farm is very remote. And then they identified themselves. My mother had absolutely no idea who they were. She had never heard their names before. And Mrs. Warren walked over to our old black stove in the kitchen, and she put her hand over her eyes and her other hand on the corner of the stove and became very quiet. And she said, “I sense a malignant entity in this house. Her name is Bathsheba.” Now, Mrs. Warren knew absolutely nothing about the history of the house or the area. Nothing. And she plucked that name out of thin air.

Bathsheba Sherman never lived in that house. She lived at the Sherman farm, which was about a mile away. There were only a few homesteads in the area at that time. She was born in 1812 and she died in 1885. And there were stories that she was in that house and had an infant in her care and that the baby died. The autopsy revealed that a needle had been impaled at the base of its skull and it was ruled that the baby’s death was from convulsions. My mother only found one article about it and it was stored in the archives of Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. She read about an inquest in the town of Burillville, Rhode Island. So, there was apparently a hearing in the neighboring town of Gloucester. And apparently there was an inquest and Bathsheba was questioned by a judge about her involvement with the death of the child. And apparently, she was very convincing that she had absolutely nothing to do with it. So it never went to a jury. There was never a formal indictment. It was let go and she was dismissed from the inquest. But in the court of public opinion, this young woman who had just married Judson Sherman was tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. And there were all kinds of accusations and innuendos and rumors that circulated around her for years and years, all the years of her life, that she had something to do with it.

Oh my God, if you were to ever go there and just go to a few of the graveyards around that farm, you would stumble over one little, tiny gravestone after another after another. I mean, infant mortality rates were through the roof. And it was actually bad luck to name your baby before it reached one year old. And Bathsheba Sherman was by some, I guess, accused of practicing witchcraft. She was apparently a very beautiful woman and the other women in town were threatened by her. It was back in the time when folklore and old wives tales and the accusation of being a witch could get you killed up in San Luis, which was just like an hour north of where we were living. And had it been a little bit different time, she could have paid with her life for being accused of that. But instead, it was just a vicious rumor that circulated that she had killed the baby for making a deal with the devil for eternal youth and beauty. We listen to all of that now and say, “Well, that’s just stupid. You know, that’s just superstitious nonsense. The woman would not be buried in the middle of hallowed ground in the Riverside Cemetery in Harrisville next to her husband and all of her children had there been any proof that she was a practicing witch.” I will spend the rest of my life defending her because even though I don’t know for certain if she had anything to do with the death of that child, I don’t think it’s fair to accuse someone of murder unless you have some evidence as proof. And there was no evidence back then. There was no DNA. There was nothing. And so, I just don’t think that she had anything to do with that.

I think that it was a very unfair condemnation of her. But unfortunately, the Warrens were asking my mother to be able to do an investigation of the house. My mother told her what she knew about the history of the house. After Lorraine came up with that name, my mother said, “Well, I’ve been doing some historical research on this property and some surrounding properties in the area.” And she showed Lorraine her notebook that was filled with stories and birth certificates and death certificates. On her second or third visit, Mrs. Warren asked for the notebook, and it was filled with descriptions of the spirits in the house. It was filled with drawings of the spirits that my mother had seen. And Mrs. Warren asked if she could borrow that thick notebook of absolutely invaluable information. And she wanted to make Xerox copies of it, so it tells you what time in history that was. My mother begrudgingly handed it over to her with the promise that she would get it back. But she never did return it. Mrs. Warren kept it. It was our understanding that when the movie The Conjuring was made that that notebook was sold as part of her case files. And it’s gone. We never ever saw it again. My mother asked for it back.

My mother felt that it was part of her legacy to her children. Mrs. Warren perceived it to be a haunted item and didn’t think that it belonged in the house. So, she told my mother she would return it, but then she never did and like 15 years later, she sold it. A number of things that we had found on the property went missing when they came one night with their team. It was the night of the séance that they foisted upon my mother, insisting that she was being oppressed and that she was right on the verge of possession and if they didn’t intervene on her behalf at that point that she would be lost. That was the most horrible night of my life. I was 15 when that happened. And I remember it like it just happened. It was absolutely traumatizing. I suffer PTSD from it. I swear to you I do. It was just a few minutes, but in those few minutes, I saw the dark side of existence and that is why I choose deliberately to live in the light. I will never let anything that evil touch me. I never will.

The Warrens only came maybe five times over the course of about a year and a half. And the last time that they came was after the séance. And when my father threw them out of the house that night along with their entourage, they left that house with my mother unconscious on the parlor floor. They came back to see if she had survived that night because when they left that house, they didn’t know if she was dead or alive. It was horrible. I don’t want to disparage them. They can’t defend themselves. Mrs. Warren, I think her heart was in the right place. I mean, she was a collector of objects. Their paranormal museum didn’t make itself. Every investigation she ever did, she had something from that investigation that went into their paranormal museum. And I know people personally who’ve been through it and have seen items that disappeared from our house the night of the séance that are under glass in that museum now.

BD: Do you know if that notebook was in their paranormal museum?

AP: No, it never was. Not that I know of. No, that was kept separately.

BD: What were your interactions with the Warrens like during the times that they were doing their investigation?

AP: Mrs. Warren didn’t really have anything much to do with us, with the children. She kind of turned us over to Ed, and he’s the one that interviewed us individually. My little sister, April, had a friend, a spirit friend, up in the chimney closet between the first and second bedroom. And she wouldn’t tell them about him. And he had identified himself to her as Oliver Richardson. But she wouldn’t tell Ed about him because she was afraid that the Warrens would make him go away and she loved him. And she felt very protective of him. And he was basically the same age as she was in life when he died. So, they had a very strong connection that she was not willing to jeopardize by telling them anything about him. But the rest of us just spilled our guts. It was kind of cathartic. It was a relief to be able to talk about the activity in that house with someone who believed us.

The night that Mrs. Warren originally came to the house, Mrs. Warren told my mother that I was in the room. I was a witness to this conversation. And she told my mother that the reason, even though she had known about our predicament for a number of weeks, she decided that she and her husband would not come out to the house until Halloween was because she said that’s when the veil has thinned. And I remember my mother looking at her and then kind of not laughing because it was certainly not a laughing matter, but kind of this incredulous grunt came out of her like, well, and then she just looked at her and she said, “Well then, I guess every day is Halloween at this house and there is no veil. I don’t know what you’re talking about, this veil. There’s no veil here. We share this with a lot of spirits.” One of the things that my mother resented about the film The Conjuring—I understand why they did what they did. I get it. But what they tried to do is juxtapose the devout Roman Catholic paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, against the godless heathen parent family. You know, like we were, I won’t say pagan because pagan is a religion also, but that we didn’t have any connection to the church. And my mother took great exception to that. She didn’t even watch the film until it had been out on DVD for more than a year.

I thought that she would be very upset about the way she was represented in the film. Some of it she thought was just so ridiculous that it was not anything that she would bother to take exception to. But the one thing that she was really offended by was that our portrayal was that of a family that had no faith. And nothing could have been further from the truth. My father was born and raised in a staunch Catholic tradition as the eldest of six boys. Church was an integral part of his childhood and his family’s life. He went to parochial school, and he served as an altar boy for years of his youth. And when he graduated from high school, he went into the Navy with the intention of serving the country and then going immediately into seminary to become a priest. That’s what my father’s life plan was. And in the interim, he met my mother and fell in love. And so, the priesthood thing was out the window. But my mother, who he met in Georgia, was a Southern Baptist. And she had to convert to Catholicism in order to marry him. All of us were baptized and all of us made our first communion and all of us were raised in the Roman Catholic Church.

It was the second year, the second Easter that we were at the farm. April was seven years old, and we went to Easter Mass, and we filled our own pew. There were so many of us. And at the very end of Mass, the priest said, “and the father and the son and the Holy Ghost.” And April turned and just with her big blue eyes just looked up at my mother and she said in her big girl, outdoor voice, “See, Mom, God has ghosts just like we do.” And every single head in that church turned and looked at our family. And as we got up to leave, the priest followed us out and he came up to my father and he said, “Mr. Perron, I would appreciate it if you would take your family and worship elsewhere.” My father was so angry and so hurt that he felt abandoned by the religion that he had invested himself into his whole life. I have rarely seen my father cry and he cried on the way home that day. As we were all getting out of our big Pontiac Bonneville car, which we called the Catholic Mobile because it had room for seven plus luggage and the family dog, my mother said, “Girls, if you want to know God, go to the woods. Go to the woods.” We never ever went back to church again. Ever. Our family has never been together in a church ever since then.

BD: That’s awful for a priest to react that way to a child.

AP: The priest was afraid. He was afraid that he had that weird family from the old, haunted house up on Round Top Road in St. Patrick’s Parish. And that others might not come back to the parish if we were there. I was already in catechism classes to make my confirmation and, you know, all my friends were Catholics. Everybody went to St. Patrick’s. I would just go and kind of sit in the back of the class and all my peers were there who were getting ready to make their final confirmation into the church. It was the nuns who were teaching us. But one night, the priest was there, and he recognized me. And sure as hell, not a week later, my parents received a letter from the Bishop, who was the head of the diocese of Providence, informing my parents that I was not welcome in confirmation classes because I asked too many questions. That was it. There was something about living in that house that made you more faithful. And I found out very early on that when all hell was breaking loose in that house and there was a lot of negative energy swirling in the house, or I felt threatened or any of my sisters felt threatened, all you ever had to do was say, “Oh God, help me. “And it stopped instantly. Good conquers evil and love conquers fear. And hatred is not the opposite of love. Fear is the opposite of love and hatred is born of fear.

I believe in my heart that the Warrens had the best of intentions. 40 years later, when I saw Mrs. Warren again out in California when she and I had been invited to preview The Conjuring before it was released, she recognized me immediately and came and wrapped her arms around me. During those three days that we spent in California together, she told me that she and Ed were in over their heads the moment they crossed the threshold of that house. They just didn’t know it. She admitted terrible mistakes were made. They didn’t mean to stir up activity, but she was a bona fide clairvoyant. She had great abilities, and she didn’t always use them to their greatest good. And I think that that was because of her fascination but also her reverence and respect for spirits. She knew that spirits were real, but unfortunately, because of her sensing Bathsheba in the house, who was really only a neighbor—Her sense of that spirit’s presence is what changed everything. Because not only did she have a sense of her presence and we didn’t find out until five decades later that her husband, Judson Sherman, died on that property. We still don’t know how he died. One of my historian friends dug up that he died at the Arnold state. We don’t know how, but that would explain why her presence would be there. You know, spirits are free to come and go as they please.

They’re not locked into an earthbound, specific location. There are differences of opinion even within our own family about how free the spirits are. My sister Cindy will still argue with me about it. She believes that they’re attached to the farm because she said that when we moved, they loved us so much that if they could have come with us, they would have. My response to her is that the spirit that was standing behind Nancy on the front porch of that house the day the whole rest of the family left for Georgia was the spirit that was standing behind my sister Cindy when we arrived at the new house in Georgia. Same exact woman; same entity standing right behind her. And Cindy’s like, “No, no, it must have been somebody else. It must have been one of my guides because the spirits are stuck there. They’re trapped there. And I’m like, “No, they’re not, babe.”

‘The Conjuring’ Movie House – Photo Credit: J. Patrick Swope

BD: How much of what we see in The Conjuring really happened?

AP: There are so many discrepancies between The Conjuring and the real story that is documented in House of Darkness House of Light, the trilogy of books that I wrote that they are unrecognizable except for the names. Everybody that was associated with the film read my books, including the actors, except for maybe the youngest children couldn’t read them. But everybody, all the adults for sure, read the books and said, “Oh, hell no, we can’t tell this story,” because they were about to invest somewhere between $25 and $30 million into making this film. And it was based predominantly on the case files of Ed and Lorraine Warren. It says right on the movie trailer, case files of Ed and Lorraine. But I gave them permission to use anything that was in my books that was the actual story, the authentic telling of our family memoir. And they wouldn’t. The screenwriters, Chad and Carey Hayes, twin brothers, lovely men, wanted desperately to include elements of the true story and they wrote some of the stories into the screenplay. And every single time the suits at New Line Cinema and Warner Brothers sent the script back and said, “Take that out, redact it. We’re not going to run people out of the theater. We’re not going to make a movie that nobody will stay to watch to the end because they are terrified.” So, The Conjuring is a very toned-down version of events.

BD: Why didn’t they want to use it?

AP: They thought it was too scary; it was too real; it was too raw. It was, I mean, people who read my trilogy of books are changed. They are never the same again. When they come up for air after that deep dive, they think about everything differently. Nothing is ever the same. A lot of my readers over the years have deemed it interactive literature. They feel like by the time they’re done reading volume three, that they lived there with us, that they grew up with us, that they know every member of my family intimately well, and that they had the same experiences that we did. There’s something about this story that unlocks a person’s third eye and opens them to the netherworld in a way that nothing else ever has or ever could. Actually, the ability to expand human consciousness is not the most important part of the trilogy. House of Darkness House of Light got its title from my mother when I was about 300 pages into the first book. And she asked me what I was going to title the trilogy, and I told her I didn’t know. And she stood next to me at her old cherry desk right here in the room in which I’m sitting speaking with you right now. I wrote those books in this house. And she just looked at me and she said, “House of Darkness House of Light,” it was both. No comma, it was both. And so, there is no comma. It’s House of Darkness House of Light as one thing because my mother believes the same way that I do; that everything is energy, and everything is consciousness, and everything is one thing.

There is no delineation between natural and supernatural, between normal and paranormal. At least there isn’t for us. This is just how our lives are now. That you cannot experience what we did immersed in that environment for a decade and be unchanged by it. And I think the greatest value in me finding the courage to finally tell our story more than, I didn’t even start writing it until more than three decades after we had left. But I finally got to an age and a place in my own mind where I didn’t care how people were going to react to it anymore. I knew that we would be scrutinized. I knew that we would be belittled. I knew that there would be mean-spirited people out there that would attack our family. And instead, we were embraced by the paranormal community worldwide.

I would not be one of the very best-selling authors in this genre worldwide had it not been for The Conjuring. So, I don’t hold any grudges. The power of a well-made feature film and the images that are placed in people’s minds is what causes them to dig deeper. And based on a true story, well where’s the true story? Who wrote the true story? All they have to do is Google the name Perron and up come the books. They’ve been read all over the world. Hundreds of thousands of copies have been sold. And they’re selling better now than they did after the film came out. So, the story is getting around. And I think that the great value of the story is not the expansion of human consciousness. It is liberating people to tell their own story. Because so many people have been touched by spirits and they’re afraid to share it. They’re afraid to speak out. They’re afraid to be criticized and to be treated as somehow less than. Or I’ve often been asked, “Was there ever a time that you questioned your own sanity?” Oh, hell yes. And that is true of every member of my family. We saw things in that house that there’s no plausible explanation other than spirits are real.

We’re still learning things about that house and about the spirits who quote unquote live there, who dwell there. And I love them. I even love the cranky ones. I do because to me it doesn’t even matter who they were, that they still are is a freaking miracle. That is magical. That is cosmic forces beyond our comprehension. One of my famous quotations is very simple, but it’s very true—To be touched by a spirit is not a curse, but a blessing. It is that rare glimpse into the realm from which we come and will all inevitably return. And I end it with, be not afraid.

Continue Reading