Connect with us

Editorials

‘Riding the Bullet’ – The Cheesy Thrills of an Underappreciated Stephen King Adaptation [The Silver Lining]

Published

on

riding the bullet stephen king

In this edition of The Silver Lining, we’ll be discussing Mick Garris’ lesser-known Stephen King adaptation, Riding the Bullet.

As of 2022, I think it’s safe to say that Stephen King is still the undisputed monarch of horror adaptations. However, while everyone has heard of Carrie and Misery, most of his massive cinematic catalog is comprised of obscure stories that weren’t quite popular enough to warrant the blockbuster treatment. From Thinner to Sometimes They Come Back, these limited release/made-for-TV thrillers aren’t necessarily bad, they just can’t compete with the budget and star power of something like The Shawshank Redemption.

That’s where King’s partnership with filmmaker Mick Garris comes in. An accomplished director and screenwriter in his own right, having worked on films like Hocus Pocus and the more recent Nightmare Cinema (not to mention being the creator of Masters of Horror), Garris was originally approached to work with King on the mid-budget monster flick Sleepwalkers back in 1992. This collaboration led to a series of highly successful made-for-TV productions in the following years.

Having tackled projects like The Stand, Quicksilver Highway and the 1997 incarnation of The Shining, Garris would eventually work on his second big screen Stephen King adaptation with 2004’s Riding the Bullet. Based on the online novella of the same name, the film follows a death-obsessed art student as he hitchhikes his way back to his sick mother during Halloween of 1969, encountering dangerous specters along the way.

A ghost-infused road movie, the flick actually had a lot going for it back when it was first announced. From the groovy period setting to the original story’s somber exploration of the fear of death, not to mention an impressive cast featuring highly accomplished actors like Barbara Hershey and David-freakin’-Arquette, it seemed like this offbeat Stephen King adaptation was destined to become a box office gold mine.


SO WHAT WENT WRONG?

riding the bullet stephen king

Suffering from a highly limited theatrical release and mostly negative reviews, Riding the Bullet is proof that not even the King of horror can guarantee a box office hit. Currently sitting at 26% on Rotten Tomatoes, the film was commonly criticized for its overabundance of familiar Stephen King tropes, as well as its confusing tone and low production values. At the end of the day, the general consensus was that the experience felt like an after-school special from hell.

Of course, there are inherent difficulties in adapting Stephen King’s patented style of prose to the big screen. His characters’ internal monologues usually make up a considerable amount of his novels’ word counts, with their abstract musings making it tough to faithfully translate these stories to a visual medium. While Garris dealt with this in previous projects, with varying degrees of success, Riding the Bullet’s constant fake-outs and Alan Parker’s literal conversations with himself were understandably off-putting to a lot of viewers.

This also applies to the film’s bizarre sense of humor, with the director often using subjective cutaways to play with different filmmaking styles. It may be a creative decision, but these silly moments end up undermining the story’s underlying existential dread. While I personally don’t have a problem with Alan’s morbid daydreams (I always get a good laugh out of the scene where the Grim Reaper smokes a joint in the bathroom), it’s easy to understand why others might not feel the same way.

Lastly, there’s the issue of the film not being particularly scary, which is something of a deal breaker for a lot of horror fans. Sure, there are some gnarly makeup effects by Greg Nicotero and more than a few genuinely creepy ideas here and there, but most of the film’s scares are followed up by cheesy visual humor and/or intense character drama. This means that the truly horrific moments don’t really pack the punch that audiences have come to associate with mainstream Stephen King adaptations.

In hindsight, it seems that Riding the Bullet simply wasn’t the movie that people were expecting it to be, so both critics and audiences rejected it upon release.


THE SILVER LINING

riding the bullet david arquette

Much like coffee and vegemite, these smaller Stephen King adaptations can be something of an acquired taste. I grew up watching made-for-TV horror like The Langoliers and Rose Red, so I believe there’s a certain nostalgic charm to these overly ambitious productions despite their undeniable flaws. And when it comes to underappreciated King adaptations, I’d argue that Riding the Bullet stands out as one of the best.

For starters, it’s clear that the filmmakers were hardcore King fans, with the film featuring several nods to the writer’s horrific multiverse. Nurse Annie Wilkes even has a cameo towards the end of the flick (played by the director’s wife, Cynthia Garris), and the undead George Staub’s Ford Mustang was changed to a Plymouth Fury as an homage to Christine. There are also appearances by Stephen King adaptation veterans like Matt Frewer, who previously played Trashcan Man in Garris’ The Stand and Dr. Charles George in Quicksilver Highway.

The main cast is also pretty solid, especially Jonathan Jackson and Barbara Hershey as our paranoid lead and his loving mother. However, David Arquette really steals the show as the undead George Staub, chewing through scenery in an unhinged performance that leaves you wanting more. Not only is his character unnerving, but he’s also morbidly funny in an oddly corny sort of way, contributing to the film’s humorous ambitions.

It might bother some viewers, but I think the film’s cheesy sense of humor is strangely effective. The playful yet spooky tone makes the experience feel like an adult-oriented episode of Goosebumps, and I admire the filmmakers for wanting to try something different. In fact, I’d even argue that the story’s overly-serious musings on mortality, parenthood and suicide are only bearable because of this irreverent presentation, with the jokes being more of a feature than a bug.

The late 60s setting also contributes to the entertainment factor. While the film doesn’t quite have the resources to commit to a period-accurate aesthetic, memorable characters like the fake “Weekend Hippie” and Erika Christensen’s new-age girlfriend persona really ground viewers in this distant time and place. The retro soundtrack does its part as well, featuring kick-ass hits from artists like The Zombies and The Youngbloods.

Riding the Bullet is no undiscovered masterpiece, but it doesn’t really have to be. Honestly, my favorite thing about the movie is its earnestness. The performances may not be Oscar-worthy and the script gets a bit too literal in its visual translation of King’s storytelling techniques, but the experience still captures the writer’s trademark introspective style without feeling farcical or cynical. It’s also one of the few horror movies I can comfortably watch with my mom, and I think that means something.

Your mileage may vary depending on your tolerance of Stephen King tropes, but I think this haunted road movie is worth revisiting if you’re in the mood for a charming B picture. Like most King stories, the journey matters more than the destination here, so I recommend that viewers simply buckle up and take in the sights and sounds of this groovy trip down memory lane.


Watching a bad movie doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad experience. Even the worst films can boast a good idea or two, and that’s why we’re trying to look on the bright side with The Silver Lining, where we shine a light on the best parts of traditionally maligned horror flicks.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading