Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DVD Vs. Blu-Ray

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Rusted View Post
    If you can't see any difference between blu ray and DVD then you have to be blind.

    There is no debate here. Blu ray is light years ahead of DVD.

    When I pop in a DVD these days the grain is more apparent, the colours are wishy washy and not vibrant at all.

    i still buy TV series series on DVD but all of my movies are now blu.
    You must be popping in a shitty disc because none of my DVD's are "wishy washy"

    Unless it's a movie on a cheap bargain bin set.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by The Geek View Post
      You must be popping in a shitty disc because none of my DVD's are "wishy washy"

      Unless it's a movie on a cheap bargain bin set.
      DVD's aren't as bad as they're being made out to be. They get the job done, but the difference between Blu Ray and DVD, are day and night. Even the difference between a Blu Ray running on HD component cables, compared to HDMI is quite vast.

      Some people just don't give that much of a shit about a sharper image, and that's fine. To deny the difference being there, is just false though.


      Comment


      • #18
        I didn't even know this was possible? Blu-rays are so much better visual quality. Especially when you compare a DVD like "Aliens" to its Blu-ray remaster. There are Blu-rays that look like shit though. There are even Blu-rays that look worse than there DVD counterpart. I think I read Deadly Spawn actually looks worse on Blu-ray. If you can't tell a significant difference between DVD and Blu-ray it's either you have your equipment set up wrong, your equipment is old or of low quality, or you have vision problems.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Heretic View Post

          Some people just don't give that much of a shit about a sharper image, and that's fine. To deny the difference being there, is just false though.
          I was in denial until I made the switch. It's personal preference. Some people are happy with DVD and that's fine, but there is a massive difference between the two formats and that can't be denied.

          Just look at the restorations of older films like Jaws and Apocalypse Now. Movies that are over 30 years old but look like they were filmed today.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Rusted View Post
            I was in denial until I made the switch. It's personal preference. Some people are happy with DVD and that's fine, but there is a massive difference between the two formats and that can't be denied.

            Just look at the restorations of older films like Jaws and Apocalypse Now. Movies that are over 30 years old but look like they were filmed today.
            Yes. Some of the best blu-ray transfers out there are old movies that have been restored... 2001 especially. Just unbelievable/

            Comment


            • #21
              bluray is obviously a superior technology but personally i'm still happy with dvds for the most part. Here blurays can be a bit more expensive and unless it is a special movie I'll just go with dvd. so its partially a money issue. Picture quality is all well and good but i'm far more interested in the movie itself.

              However there are some films i would prefer to watch on dvd or hell even VHS if i can get it. Before you call me crazy let me explain. I don't see much point in owning the Texas Chainsaw Massacre for example, on bluray. I don't want that movie to look crisp and clear, it looks weird to me. the more grain the better as far as i'm concerned. Give me the VHS with weird pops and glitches. Its part of the grungy dirty charm of that film.

              I feel the same about the Evil Dead 1 and 2. They look weird to me on bluray.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by zigwardScissorHands View Post
                However there are some films i would prefer to watch on dvd or hell even VHS if i can get it. Before you call me crazy let me explain. I don't see much point in owning the Texas Chainsaw Massacre for example, on bluray. I don't want that movie to look crisp and clear, it looks weird to me. the more grain the better as far as i'm concerned. Give me the VHS with weird pops and glitches. Its part of the grungy dirty charm of that film.

                I feel the same about the Evil Dead 1 and 2. They look weird to me on bluray.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by zigwardScissorHands View Post
                  bluray is obviously a superior technology but personally i'm still happy with dvds for the most part. Here blurays can be a bit more expensive and unless it is a special movie I'll just go with dvd. so its partially a money issue. Picture quality is all well and good but i'm far more interested in the movie itself.

                  However there are some films i would prefer to watch on dvd or hell even VHS if i can get it. Before you call me crazy let me explain. I don't see much point in owning the Texas Chainsaw Massacre for example, on bluray. I don't want that movie to look crisp and clear, it looks weird to me. the more grain the better as far as i'm concerned. Give me the VHS with weird pops and glitches. Its part of the grungy dirty charm of that film.

                  I feel the same about the Evil Dead 1 and 2. They look weird to me on bluray.
                  I have the original TCM and blu-ray... and it certainly isn't crisp or clear.... In the case with that movie in particular, it has erased any "errors" or blemishes on the video, but all of the grain and grit is perfectly intact. But I know exactly what you mean with certain movies.


                  Here are some screens of TCM 74 on blu-ray. Its one of those movies that makes you wonder "why should I get this on blu-ray?".







                  And the answer is, you don't really need to because there isn't any significant increase in crispness or quality, but if you don't own it already getting the blu-ray is probably your best bet. Either for special features purposes or just because, in my opinion, it has never looked grittier or nastier before. A blu-ray won't necessarily make it crisp, but it will most accurately re-create the original look of the film according to the filmmaker's perspective. TCM 74 isn't beautiful on blu-ray, because it isn't supposed to be. But it looks how the movie should. A common misconception of blu-rays is that they make movies look way more clear, in the case of some movies the original look of the movie can be more accurately shown because a blu-ray disc can hold up to 50 gigs of video data vs the 8 on a standard dvd.

                  Unless you really want the ugliness of the VHS to enhance the grossness of the movie... which I get. I think with this particular movie, they have done an incredible job of getting the look and sound of the movie down perfectly.

                  EDit

                  but all in all, it really makes you question why movies like this need a blu-ray upgrade at all... if they're ugly they're ugly.
                  Last edited by The Revelator; 02-28-2013, 11:54 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by The Revelator View Post
                    A blu-ray won't necessarily make it crisp, but it will most accurately re-create the original look of the film according to the filmmaker's perspective.
                    That's the most significant aspect for people who want to convert to Blu-ray and who happen to be movielovers. DVD can't catch that look, but a worn out VHS is the best choice to watch video nasties like TCM or The Evil Dead in the way they are supposed to being watched. Gritty, ugly and dirty.
                    The decision is yours.
                    "I want this place to go nuts, north, south, east, west, left, right! Activate this dance floor!!"
                    Scott Vogel from Terror

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      To see the quality of blu-ray you need very good eye sight. As soon as I got glasses I immediately saw the difference. If you can't see any difference, then either get glasses, or get a new prescription!!
                      ""I was perfect"- Nina Sayers"


                      Have a looky at my new horror movie blog!

                      http://asdaman.wordpress.com/

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by horrorking95 View Post
                        To see the quality of blu-ray you need very good eye sight. As soon as I got glasses I immediately saw the difference. If you can't see any difference, then either get glasses, or get a new prescription!!
                        Yeah and repeating what has already been said, having a good HDtv is a must as well. Cheap, bargain brand televisions really don't look good at all.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          ^^ What he said.
                          I paid nearly $2000 for my Samsung HD 55" like 4 years ago.

                          No regrets

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Blu-ray is all time best , no other video or DVD can compare with it. I have a lots of collection of Blu-ray movies , even i always wait for that the movie come into blu-ray format and than i purchase it or download it.
                            Last edited by John305; 05-13-2013, 02:14 AM.
                            Melbourne Signs

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Frey View Post
                              No I am serious. However, I do have a uncurable eye condition which might make me see it differently, but my wife thinks HD isnt much better as well.
                              Watch Alien on DVD, then BluRay and you tell me there is no difference, better yet, Flash Gordon. Hands down the most beautiful transfer I've seen. Maybe on par with Alien.

                              Originally posted by Rusted View Post
                              When I pop in a DVD these days the grain is more apparent, the colours are wishy washy and not vibrant at all.
                              This.

                              I can't stand DVD anymore. I watch it and think "Fuck, how did I ever think this was good?"

                              It looks so terrible.

                              You do get your good transfers and bad though, I know RoboCop is fucking shitty. Same with Hellraiser, apart from the OOP Anchor Bay copies.


                              EDIT: I also know if you have a shitty BluRay player it's nowhere near as noticeable.
                              "Everyone is a moon, and has a dark side, which he never shows to anybody. If, he can help it." -- Mark Twain





                              "I do not see why man should not be just as cruel as nature." -- Adolf Hitler


                              You are a sadistic, volatile and all over out of control internet cruise missile, that's what you are, Oxley.
                              Do you have American animals in your Zoo's? Like Bears, Elephants and Giraffes?
                              My little idiot..

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I guess the ps3 is still one of the best blurays on the market, because it upscales my dvd's pretty damn good. The Blob (8 is one, in particular, that I recently bought, and was surprised at the non shitty look of the picture. It was actually quite crisp.

                                I do prefer blu, though. Ever since I saw Terminator 2 maybe 5 or 6 years ago.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X