Connect with us

Editorials

“Masters of Horror”: 5 Must-See Episodes to Stream on Screambox Now!

Published

on

Almost every horror anthology, be it a movie or a TV series, has a gimmick. Some are attached to certain authors for their source material (Roald Dahl’s Tales of the UnexpectedThe Ray Bradbury Theater) while others are holiday-themed (Trick ‘r Treat, Into the Dark). The motifs are numerous. An anthology concept that stands out to this day is the one that defines Showtime’s Masters of Horror. This two-season collection of self-contained stories still haunts fans’ memories.

Masters of Horror, a Mick Garris passion project inspired by a dinner for him and his fellow horror auteurs, had a simple design; every episode was directed by a notable name in the horror genre: Dario Argento, John CarpenterJoe DanteStuart Gordon, and Tobe Hooper to name a few.

With Masters of Horror now streaming in high-definition on Screambox, now is the perfect time to revisit the series. And these five memorable episodes are a good place to start.


Imprint

Thanks to the J-horror wave of the 2000s, Takashi Miike was getting recognized more and more outside of Japan. The filmmaker was invited to Masters of Horror after notable acclaim for his existing output, including The Happiness of the Katakuris, Ichi the Killer, and One Missed Call. Although his contribution, “Imprint“, was set to close out the first season, Showtime ended up not airing it due to concerns over its content. Mind you, Masters was already taking full advantage of its license for gore and sex. So the fact that “Imprint” was singled out as too disturbing says something.

In Miike’s episode, set during the 19th century, an American (Billy Drago) visits Japan in search of his lost love, Komomo (Michié). After learning of her passing, another woman recounts a story about the harsh fate that befell Komomo.

After having seen “Imprint”, it’s not hard to understand why Showtime was so wary in the first place; this is the most graphic episode of the entire series. What it lacks in Miike’s typical dark intellect it makes up for in utter shock value and gruesome delights.


Jenifer

Dario Argento needs little introduction, and it was certainly a no-brainer to cast him as a director. Argento, however, didn’t write either of his two entries because the directors didn’t usually have a hand in the scripts. There were of course exceptions to the rule, but handling “Jenifer” on paper was the episode’s very own star, Steven Weber. The story itself is from the mind of Bruce Jones.

In “Jenifer”, a disaffected cop (Weber) happens upon a man trying to kill the episode’s namesake (Carrie Anne Fleming). He saves her only to then discover she isn’t like any other woman he’s ever met. The cop soon falls under Jenifer’s spell and starts to craves her touch. Unfortunately for him and those who come in contact, Jenifer also has her own unique cravings.

Even though Argento didn’t write this, he injects as much of his directorial style as possible. “Jenifer” still ends up being a compelling if not mysterious tale of obsession. It’s a depraved story with a lot of bite.


Sick Girl

At the time, Lucky McKee wasn’t so recognizable. He had previously helmed the exceptional movie May, but other than that, McKee came to Masters with little horror under his belt. Knowing that, “Sick Girl” wound up being a favorite for many of the series’ fans.

In “Sick Girl”, an awkward entomologist (Angela Bettis) starts dating an eccentric artist (Erin Brown). At first Bettis’ character fears her career in bugs will scare her date away, but the revelation only causes the opposite reaction. At the same time, someone has directly delivered a rare — and very dangerous — specimen that will put the women’s new relationship to the test.

Queer horror was not very common to see back when “Sick Girl” first aired, but this episode was a breath of fresh air. Of all the stories, this one has plenty of room for critical analysis. For example, homophobia pops up in the form of a curmudgeonly neighbor whose evident dislike of the lesbian protagonists is filtered through an intense aversion to insects. Suffice it to say, there’s a lot to dissect here.


Cigarette Burns

John Carpenter‘s first episode is deemed one of the series’ absolute best. The story touches on a favorable subject in horror; cursed objects. In this case, the ill-fated item is a film.

According to lore, the sought after movie in “Cigarette Burns” was screened only once because it drove audiences to fits of violence. Norman Reedus‘ character is then hired by a cinephile, played by Udo Kier, to track down the missing film. His doing so only leads him down a path of no return.

As with Carpenter’s In the Mouth of Madness, “Cigarette Burns” imagines what might happen if someone’s work of art is so dangerously influential. There are caveats to consider when assessing this episode, but the minds at work have tapped into something both unsettling and insightful about why film matters so much to us.


Sounds Like

Brad Anderson might not be the first name to come to mind when recalling masters of horror, but his movie Session 9 has a large following. That achievement in suspense alone is likely why he was enlisted for the second season. And “Sounds Like” feels like an anomaly when put up against the other episodes.

In “Sounds Like”, a father and husband (Chris Bauer) drowns himself in work to avoid thinking about his grief. He also has an uncanny ability after losing his son; he has a heightened sense of hearing. In time, though, the racket in his head becomes too much and he must find a way to quell the noise.

Upon its original release, “Sounds Like” was dismissed as not scary. The truth is, Anderson’s episode really feels like something from The Twilight Zone. The horror climate has changed a lot since the series was on the air, so audiences today might better appreciate this unusual and rather sad story about grief.


If you like these episodes, check out the rest of Masters of Horror on Streambox.

Subscriptions include unlimited movies and shows, with no ads: Month to month pricing is $4.99, while you can get discounted rates at 3 months ($11.99) or one year ($39.99).

Sign up for Screambox here and become a premium subscriber!

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading