The NFL Prediction Thread

[Freddy_Lives]

Originally Posted by DudeClassicMan

Too bad the Reed had under a 1,000 yards receiving in three of those PRO BOWL seasons, dumb shit. Just to show how dumb you are, you think players have time to sit down and closely scrutinize some All-Star game ballot?

Besides I know how fucked up Pro Bowl balloting it is because Roy Williams the safety made the Pro Bowl three straight years after he started stinking.

Sigh you are the Queen Bee of stupidity. JUST STOP you really are making yourself more pathetic.

Once again Prior to 1995, only the coaches and the players made Pro Bowl selections.

FOR THE COACHES AND PLAYERS TO VOTE ANDRE REED 7 STRAIGHT PRO-BOWLS SINCE ALL HIS PRO-BOWLS CAME BEFORE 1995
v
v
v
HE MUST BE PRETTY GOOD!

[DudeClassicMan]

Originally Posted by Freddy_Lives

Sigh you are the Queen Bee of stupidity. JUST STOP you really are making yourself more pathetic.

Once again Prior to 1995, only the coaches and the players made Pro Bowl selections.

FOR THE COACHES AND PLAYERS TO VOTE ANDRE REED 7 STRAIGHT PRO-BOWLS SINCE ALL HIS PRO-BOWLS CAME BEFORE 1995
v
v
v
HE MUST BE PRETTY GOOD!

Big fucking deal; under 1,000 yards receiving is an average-to-good season. Four of those magical Pro Bowl seasons Reed had wasn't even good enough to be in the top ten in receiving yardage.

PRO BOWLS DON'T MEAN SHIT!

Irvin's season-by-season ranks in receiving yardage during his five Pro Bowls:

'91: 1st
'92: 2nd
'93: 2nd
'94: 8th
'95: 4th

Are you just a little fantasy football dork or just a dumbshit redneck who decides he doesn't like certain players because they snort too much blow and fuck too many white wimmen?

[Freddy_Lives]

Originally Posted by DudeClassicMan

Are you just a little fantasy football dork or just a dumbshit redneck who decides he doesn't like certain players because they snort too much blow and fuck too many white wimmen?

You are something else

35th In Receptions, 21st In Yardage, 45th In Touchdowns

You preach that he made such an impact that he was valuable to his team sure Michael Irvin was good but at the end of the day what stats do you want? Would you want 20+ more touchdowns 250+ more receptions 1200 more yards 2 more pro-bowls if you were drafting a player? Andre Reed = more LONGEVITY + VERSATILITY + A Better Person all around which sure doesn't matter but looking at it >>>> is a no fucking brainer for anyone that knows football.

Nobody in their right mind wouldn't take MORE TOUCHDOWNS

Just shut up already YOU LOST FOR THE 100TH TIME.

[DudeClassicMan]

Originally Posted by Freddy_Lives

You are something else

35th In Receptions, 21st In Yardage, 45th In Touchdowns

You preach that he made such an impact that he was valuable to his team sure Michael Irvin was good but at the end of the day what stats do you want? Would you want 20+ more touchdowns 250+ more receptions 1200 more yards 2 more pro-bowls if you were drafting a player? Andre Reed = more LONGEVITY + VERSATILITY + A Better Person all around which sure doesn't matter but looking at it >>>> is a no fucking brainer for anyone that knows football.

Nobody in their right mind wouldn't take MORE TOUCHDOWNS

Just shut up already YOU LOST FOR THE 100TH TIME.

Yet one's in the Hall Of The Fame and the other still isn't.

You lost because you're too stupid to understand simple math. 75 yards/game>57 yards/game. Reed's better because he stuck around to have four more average seasons; right? Running a 20-yard reverse once or twice a season isn't even as valuable as Irvin's blocking game-in game-out; twitstick.

[DudeClassicMan]

Originally Posted by Freddy_Lives

You are something else

35th In Receptions, 21st In Yardage, 45th In Touchdowns

You preach that he made such an impact that he was valuable to his team sure Michael Irvin was good but at the end of the day what stats do you want? Would you want 20+ more touchdowns 250+ more receptions 1200 more yards 2 more pro-bowls if you were drafting a player? Andre Reed = more LONGEVITY + VERSATILITY + A Better Person all around which sure doesn't matter but looking at it >>>> is a no fucking brainer for anyone that knows football.

Nobody in their right mind wouldn't take MORE TOUCHDOWNS

Just shut up already YOU LOST FOR THE 100TH TIME.

Three Super Bowls in four years in your prime when you were a top three receiver>four average ass jabronie years at the end of a career to pad your fucking stats.

[Freddy_Lives]

Originally Posted by nancylives!

Andre reed was great, so was tim brown, chris carter, irving fryer. and they didn't win shit.

Andre Reed had over 1,200 yards in the playoffs with 9 touchdowns and 85 Receptions wtf else could he have done ? He wasn't flaky at all in the playoffs.

In the 4 superbowls he had 27 receptions and 323 yards. 152 yards AGAINST DALLAS in supebowl 27.

Just because you have rings especially at the wide-receiver position does not make you a hall of famer because you cannot take over a game or you are less likely too unlike the other positions.

[Freddy_Lives]

Originally Posted by DudeClassicMan

Yet one's in the Hall Of The Fame and the other still isn't.

You lost because you're too stupid to understand simple math. 75 yards/game>57 yards/game. Reed's better because he stuck around to have four more average seasons; right? Running a 20-yard reverse once or twice a season isn't even as valuable as Irvin's blocking game-in game-out; twitstick.

LMFAO You laugh at the pro-bowls because it's the fans even though Andre had 2 more pro-bowls and before 1995 when it was the coaches/players yet you agree with the Hall which is just journalists DUDE YOUR LOGIC IS SO MUCH FAIL.

[DudeClassicMan]

Originally Posted by Freddy_Lives

Andre Reed had over 1,200 yards in the playoffs with 9 touchdowns and 85 Receptions wtf else could he have done ? He wasn't flaky at all in the playoffs.

In the 4 superbowls he had 27 receptions and 323 yards. 152 yards AGAINST DALLAS in supebowl 27.

Just because you have rings especially at the wide-receiver position does not make you a hall of famer because you cannot take over a game or you are less likely too unlike the other positions.

Yes, it does; just ask Lynn Swann and John Stallworth. But Irvin had the numbers during his prime, so you don't even have a valid point.

[DudeClassicMan]

Originally Posted by Freddy_Lives

LMFAO You laugh at the pro-bowls because it's the fans even though Andre had 2 more pro-bowls and before 1995 when it was the coaches/players yet you agree with the Hall which is just journalists DUDE YOUR LOGIC IS SO MUCH FAIL.

And you think less than 1,000 yards receiving is a legendary Hall Of Fame superstar season? Ignore actual production; but pay attention to All-Star game voting. Pro Bowls aren't production, ignoramus.

[Freddy_Lives]

Originally Posted by DudeClassicMan

Yes, it does; just ask Lynn Swann and John Stallworth. But Irvin had the numbers during his prime, so you don't even have a valid point.

K by that logic Deion Branch is a first ballot hall of famer or David Patten.