Connect with us

Editorials

Revisit John Carpenter’s ‘The Thing’ From the Point of View of the Virus Itself

Published

on

John Carpenter’s 1982 sci-fi/horror remake The Thing is not only one of the greatest horror remakes of all time, it’s up there as one of the best horror movies period. There are few people who will speak ill of The Thing and it’s understandable why. It has great characters, a solid script, timeless practical FX, and an unsettling score, all of which combine into an experience that, while unappreciated upon release, has become one of the pinnacles of cinema.

It’s a movie that has drawn a lot of investigation and critique. Some find it to be a feminist film where the virus itself is a female entity. Others look into the philosophy of the situation and the challenges it presents. While these theories can be fascinating and add depth and layers to the film previously unthought of, everyone has the right to view the film from their own angle and through their own lens.

One such fascinating approach comes from author Peter Watts, who wrote a brilliant short story titled “The Things“, which follows the story we’ve seen but this time it’s from the point of view of the virus itself. Not content with just retelling the film and its events, Watts creates an entire backstory, something deep and rich about this alien biological threat and how it moves and grows. Fascinatingly, he also gives the virus a wide range of emotions, taking the time to discuss its fears and its concerns, not just with the humans it’s facing at the Antarctic base but also from its own knowledge of the universe. According to the story, this is a being that has colonized and overtaken countless planets. So why, it ponders, has no one come to save it when it was trapped in ice for those thousands of years? How can it preserve itself and ensure its survival?

The story – which has the following accolades: 2011 Hugo Award Nominee, 2010 BSFA Award Finalist, 2010 Shirley Jackson Award Winner, 2011 Finalist: The Locus Award for Best Short Story, 2011 Theodore Sturgeon Award Nominee – is magnificently crafted because, at least for me, it elicited a strange sense of sympathy for “The Thing”. It is desperate to survive and its intentions are pure but it clearly has no concept of humanity and what makes us so, well…human. As the virus moves throughout the characters of the film, it begins to realize that humans are like nothing it’s ever encountered before and it begins to realize the magnitude of the situation.

What makes this story so fascinating is how detailed and intricately its written. It really does feel like we’re in the point of view of something inhuman, something alien. Every sentence demands that we exit the safety of our own experiences and try to empathize with something whose sole purpose is to take us over and erase us entirely. Obviously, I highly recommend that you give it a read when you have a chance. if you want an audio version, you can listen right here.

Alright, now that I’m done here, what are some stories that you love? Are there any that have fundamentally changed how you viewed a movie/game/comic/whatever?

Managing editor/music guy/social media fella of Bloody-Disgusting

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading