New Images And Poster For 'The Hunger Games: Catching Fire' Blaze Up - Bloody Disgusting!

New Images And Poster For ‘The Hunger Games: Catching Fire’ Blaze Up

Catching_Fire_Banner_1_14_13

Lionsgate’s The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, hits theaters November 22, 2013 from director Francis Lawrence. That’s still a ways away, but the stills and now posters are beginning to emerge.

‘Catching Fire’ begins as Katniss Everdeen has returned home safe after winning the 74th Annual Hunger Games along with fellow tribute Peeta Mellark. Winning means that they must turn around and leave their family and close friends, embarking on a “Victor’s Tour” of the districts. Along the way Katniss senses that a rebellion is simmering, but the Capitol is still very much in control as President Snow prepares the 75th Annual Hunger Games (The Quarter Quell) – a competition that could change Panem forever.

Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Lenny Kravitz, Elizabeth Banks, Stanley Tucci, Donald Sutherland, Toby Jones, Woody Harrelson, Jena Malone, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Lynn Cohen, Patrick St. Esprit, Meta Golding, Bruno Gunn, Maria Howell and Sam Claflin all star.

Head inside to check out the stills and the poster!

  • SelfishMan912

    i’m really holding my breath for this one. i liked the first one enough, but this is (in my opinion) the best book in the series. i sincerely hope they’re able to do it justice and for the love of FUCK, they cut out the pointless shaky cam bullshit.

  • ljbad

    I did not know The Stig was going to be in Catching Fire.

  • djblack1313

    i did enjoy the first movie. SelfishMan, yeah, so many people hated the shaky cam on this movie! lol. in any article about this upcoming movie there’s always tons of comments saying no more shaky cam. hopefully with this new director on board there will be less (hopefully NONE!) of that.

  • Aaron Emery

    I enjoyed the first one well enough. I’ve read the books and, though the writing was very amateurish, they were pretty entertaining. I don’t know, I really see this becoming (well, already is) a tween girl franchise. They are going to play up the “love story” more than the politics which is the opposite of the books.

  • WalkingDeadGuy

    I really liked the first film; I thought it was a pretty good adaptation. I know I probably stand alone on this, but I actually liked how the shaky camera was used; I thought it helped give the film a somewhat gritty and intimate feel to an otherwise high budget studio film.

    • djblack1313

      WalkingDeadGuy, i don’t think the shaky cam bothered me because i can’t even remember it in the movie. i remember (of course!) the movie itself and it’s events but if the shaky cam bothered me i would remember it. lol. the show FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS had HORRIBLE shaky cam even on non-action parts and i fully remember that. :)

  • WalkingDeadGuy

    True, I thought the “shaky camera” was used in a very subtle way. Some films just don’t need to be so polished and perfectly framed. A movie like ‘Blue Valentine’ for instance, would not have turned out as good as it did without that intimate, in your face camera. I really hope the new director can deliver a good film. If he fails, at least I got to see a movie with hotties such as Liam Hemsworth and Sam Claflin :-)