Connect with us

Editorials

The Resurgence Of Horror Vinyl (Editorial)

Published

on

Something that you may have noticed that has been getting a lot more attention on BD Music is vinyl. The analog format has been seeing a rise in popularity, its sales constantly on the rise. In the UK, vinyl sales broke 500,000 copies in 2013 with 4% of purchases not even owning a turntable. In the US, sales of vinyl have increased by 338% over the last seven years. What was once thought to be a dying format, one that was gasping its last breaths, has shown it not only has some life left in it but that it’s actually thriving.

When it comes to horror, several labels have begun focusing their trade on finding and bringing us the very best that the genre has to offer. As I write this, Waxwork Records has just opened up pre-orders for John Harrison‘s Creepshow, Death Waltz has announced that they will be releasing Fabio Frizzi‘s City Of The Living Dead, and One Way Static is gearing up for the upcoming release of Cannibal Ferox, composed by Roberto Donati.

But what is behind this sudden interest? What has spurred these labels to dive into the past when everything about the internet and today’s society seems to be entirely focused on the future? It’s something that’s been on my mind and I wanted to offer some thoughts I had on the topic. So, pop on your favorite horror score and join me below!

My own personal interest in vinyl began when I purchased a first edition copy of King Crimson‘s In The Court Of The Crimson King for a mere $0.25 at a garage sale. It was my first record and I purchased it because I truly loved the album. I figured someday I would be able to hear it as it was meant to be heard but, at the time, it wasn’t a pressing thought. It was only when I purchased Mondo’s re-issue of The Beyond that I got the urge to begin acquiring everything I would need to actually listen to vinyl.

My modest collection now stands at nearly 40 records. It’s nothing huge but it’s mine and I derive such joy from putting on a record, sitting back, and letting the music wash over me. As I write this, I’m listening to Waxwork Records reissue of Krzysztof Komeda‘s gorgeous Rosemary’s Baby score and earlier I was listening to Russian Circles‘ latest album Memorial.

There is something to be said about being held hostage by music. After all, when you put on a record, it’s not something you can take with you. It’s not something you can fit into your pocket, hook up to your car stereo, or anything like that. You put on a record and you are forced to stay nearby, so as to appreciate it the way that it should be appreciated. You’re forced to interact with the music rather than let it be simple background noise.

But my personal feelings towards vinyl don’t answer the questions I posed earlier. Why is horror so big on vinyl these days? Why are we seeing it rise in a way that has never before been seen? Allow me to break it down into some ideas I have on the matter.

1) People Are Craving Originality

When it comes to horror, the fans are always asking, practically begging, for something original, something unique. They bring up titles from the past that were pioneers of a subgenre, much like how Psycho practically invented slashers. This want for originality also leads to a distaste for excessive sequels and potentially unnecessary remakes.

When looking at this from a vinyl perspective, it’s easy to see that people want the originals on wax, not the music of current films. It’s the originals that hold the charm, the thrills, the real terror. We want Harry Manfredini‘s score to Friday The 13th, not Steve Jablonsky‘s. It’s John Carpenter‘s score for The Fog that sends shivers up and down our spines and not the music of Graeme Revell.

It is the past that we remember horror being the best. Once something new has been done there’s very little that can top it because it will never have that sense of originality. Our nostalgia breeds our demand for true horror that we can love as much as the films that moved us in the first place but that they can never hope to match.

2) Technology

Music is the most technologically advanced that it’s ever been. The amount that producers, engineers, even home musicians can do is astonishing. A one-person project can sound like a full band with a complete orchestra backing them up. Look at bands that embrace the future, such as Tesseract and Periphery, using tools that create absolutely fascinating tones and soundscapes. Such bands are on the rise and are ever evolving. It’s a new revolutionary movement within the music world.

However, there are the bands that eschew such technology or, at the least, stick with tried and true methods. Bands like Bloody Hammers and Helms Alee have a very raw, almost unpolished sound. But there is something deeply organic, warm, and personal about such an approach. It feels almost more human. Mistakes aren’t edited out, they are embraced. Little flaws are what give the overall product its character, much like with horror.

See, some of the best horror films are the ones that are technologically timeless. There is nothing in the movie that detracts and causes a scoffed laugh. Think of a movie like Scream 4 that uses real time streaming technology. Yeah, it was clever upon release but that technology was already around and it’s bound to be improved upon. When we see a movie like Alien (which I personally feel is a timeless classic that can never be touched), the green text black background computers are such a thing of the past that it’s immediately noticeable and potentially distracting. Is it necessary? Because of the kind of film that it is, absolutely.

But when we look at a lot of the popular horror that is coming out today, especially in TV, technology is not something utilized. Think of The Walking Dead and its total lack of technology. People are reverting to the basic necessities. Or how about American Horror Story and three seasons taking place in the past where relatable technology isn’t a factor and therefore unable to distract. And yet another example is Hannibal, a beautiful, bleak, horrific show that is far more focused on the wonder and mystery of the human mind, the organic.

It is because of this surge in an almost Luddite approach to horror that I believe horror vinyl is making its comeback. We have super fancy MP3 players and we’re able to stream high quality music through a multitude of services. Moving forward is something that we don’t necessarily need to do.

We, the consumer, have shown that there is interest in a product that many believed was not modern, not “up to date”, and on a crash course path to extinction. Mondo announces the release of a horror vinyl and it sells out within minutes. Labels like One Way Static and SpaceLab 9 are thriving, even with just a few releases. Music On Vinyl, while being a venue for more than just horror vinyl, has some truly astonishing titles that were originally released to a generation whose current living population is in the low single digit percentile, if at all, such as Bride Of Frankenstein.

While there is a portion of horror that will always be looking ahead and trying to bring us the future, there is always going to be an undercurrent of tried and true terrors that time will never touch. Horror vinyl is using the past to help rekindle that joyous fear we used to experience.


Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading