Connect with us

Editorials

Horror Retrospective: 1935 (Editorial)

Published

on

THE YEAR: 1935

Greetings, friends. I started this column for Bloody Disgusting last fall and wrote about horror films from 1931-1934. My duties as an adjunct English instructor prohibited me from continuing the column until now, but I’m pleased to revive the column (with 1935) for one main reason: Bride of Frankenstein. As far as sequels go, it’s one the best that you can find. Universal significantly increased director James Whale’s budget, and Boris Karloff’s performance as the monster is even more touching than it was in 1931’s Frankenstein. It must be said, however, that 1935 was a pretty lean year as far as horror is concerned. As mentioned in the 1934 editorial, the Hays Code was in full swing, and – for the most part – studios weren’t budgeting for horror movies. Nonetheless, there are several low budget gems worth your consideration. Boris Karloff, aside from reprising his role of the monster in Bride of Frankenstein, shared the screen again with Bela Lugosi in a (loose) adaptation of Edgar Allan Poe’s The Raven; Karloff also starred in a strange film about the psychological connection of twins in The Black Room; Karl Freund (who directed Karloff in The Mummy (1932)) directed his final film, Mad Love, before he became – almost exclusively – a cinematographer; and Henry Hull starred in the thought-provoking Werewolf of London. So sit back, relax, and let me pique your interest in the five best horror films of 1935.

___

BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN

(D) James Whale

(W) William Hurlbut

(S) Boris Karloff, Elsa Lanchester, Colin Clive, and Valerie Hobson

You would be hard-pressed to find a better sequel than Bride of Frankenstein. Many of the same people from Frankenstein (1931) – both in front of and behind the camera – are involved, and this film benefits greatly from that consistency. Initially, we get a bit of back story, including the origin of the legend (which has also been detailed in Ken Russell’s GOTHIC (1986) and Ivan Passer’s Haunted Summer 1988)), in which Mary Shelley (Lanchester, who also plays the Bride) conjures up the idea for her novel, Frankenstein, after sharing ghost stories with her husband, Percy Shelley (Douglas Walton) and Lord Byron (Gavin Gordon). Afterwards (in a bit of contrivance), Dr. Henry Frankenstein (Clive, reprising his role from the original) and his monster (Karloff), are discovered to be alive! Dr. Frankenstein’s mentor, Dr. Pretorius (Ernest Thesiger) ­– in a great scene – proceeds to show him several small creatures that have been re-animated. Pretorius suggests to Henry that they should create a mate for Henry’s initial creation. Of course, things don’t go as planned. Check out this sequel for the excellent acting and heart-breaking performances from Karloff and Lanchester.

bride_of_frankenstein

___

THE RAVEN

(D) Louis Friedlander (a.k.a. Lew Landers)

(W) David Boehm

(S) Boris Karloff, Bela Lugosi, Lester Matthews, and Irene Ware

Once again, as they had in The Black Cat (1934), horror legends Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi share the screen in Friedlander’s The Raven, and the results are – at times – electric. Lugosi plays Dr. Vollin, a retired neurosurgeon who is obsessed with Edgar Allan Poe; he even has his very own torture chamber in his basement, which harkens particularly to The Pit and the Pendulum. Vollin is solicited by Judge Thatcher (Samuel Hinds) and Jerry Halden (Matthews) to bring a severely injured Jean Thatcher (Ware) back to health. Vollin falls in love with Jean, prompting the judge and Halden to try to tear Jean away. In order to keep Judge Thatcher and Halden at bay, Vollin enlists the help of Edmond Bateman (Karloff) a murderer on the lam. The scenes that Lugosi and Karloff share are wonderful and help to alleviate sporadic poor acting from some of their counterparts and some slow pacing. Poe fans will notice many “easter eggs” to his various works throughout the film.

raven

___

THE BLACK ROOM

(D) R. William Neill

(W) Arthur Strawn and Henry Myers

(S) Boris Karloff, Marian Marsh, and Robert Allen

Boris Karloff, the busiest man in Hollywood horror cinema, stars as both Baron Gregor and his twin brother, Anton, in The Black Room. Baron Gregor is a despotic ruler who likes to kill women; enter Anton, who is incredulous of his brother’s actions. The townspeople wind up admiring Anton (especially in light of his brother’s exploits), so Gregor abandons his position. All’s well that ends well, right? Not so fast. Gregor, jealous of Anton, lures him to the titular room and kills his twin. After this deed, Gregor takes over his twin brother’s life and prepares to marry Anton’s betrothed, Thea (the lovely Marian Marsh). In an interesting twist – and one that’s sure to please dog lovers – Anton’s mastiff suspects Gregor’s deception, and the dog, along with the townspeople, reveal Gregor’s true identity. Let’s just say things don’t turn out as Gregor planned in this chilling psychological thriller.

 black_room

 ___

 MAD LOVE

(D) Karl Freund

(W) P.J. Wolfson and John L. Balderston

(S) Peter Lorre, Frances Drake, Colin Clive, and Sara Haden

Mad Love is another adaptation of the novel Les Mains d’Orlac (The Hands of Orlac) by Maurice Renard. If you’ve never seen the original The Hands of Orlac (1924), directed by Robert Weine and starring Conrad Veidt (both from The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)), do yourself a favor and give it a watch. Horror icon Peter Lorre plays Dr. Gogol, who lusts after Yvonne Orlac (Drake). Gogol’s obsession with Yvonne is so absolute that he orders a full size wax figure of her so that he can keep her in his home. Meanwhile, Dr. Orlac (Clive), is returning to Paris when he is involved in a gruesome train accident that mangles his hands. Yvonne, aware of Gogol’s surgical talents, beseeches him to fix her husband’s hands; however, (in a Frankenstein-esque twist) Gogol replaces Orlac’s hands with those of a murderer. The transplant causes Orlac to exhibit strange behavior, and that’s only the beginning of the crazy plot. Watch this as a double bill with the aforementioned The Hands of Orlac for a complete experience.

mad_love

___

WEREWOLF OF LONDON

(D) Stuart Walker

(W) John Colton

(S) Henry Hull, Warner Oland, and Valerie Hobson

Released a full six years before the seminal The Wolf Man (1941), Werewolf of London earns a spot on this list for the excellent make-up provided by Jack Pierce. You are probably familiar with the story, and this version doesn’t stray too far from the versions you’re more familiar with. Wilfred Glendon (Hull) is an English botanist who travels to Tibet in search of the mariphasa plant, which has eluded botanists for years. While in Tibet, Glendon becomes the victim of a werewolf’s bite, and we all know what that means. Coincidentally, the mariphasa plant is revealed to be an antidote for the lycanthropic disease that Glendon has contracted. Glendon uses mariphasa to successfully quell his first transformation, but he is unable to suppress his subsequent ones. There is an interesting plot twist (that seasoned horror vets will probably see coming), but Werewolf of London is largely successful because of the excellent make-up, eerie settings, and uniformly strong acting.

werewolf_of_london

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading