Connect with us

Movies

[Review] Ethan Hawke’s Vampire Film ‘Daybreakers’

Published

on

It has been five long years since the Spierig brothers hit the US with their indie zombie film Undead, which Lionsgate dumped in limited theaters before its eventual DVD release. The Australian directors quickly had their first major studio release greenlit, entitled Daybreakers, which finally has its world premiere at the Midnight Madness portion of the Toronto International Film Festival. While I was a big fan of Undead, I really wanted to see what the duo did next before I made my judgment on how talented the Spierig brothers where; was it a fluke? Daybreakers is not only a fun film, but an ambitious display of filmmaking that shows just how good a movie can be on a small budget (again).

In the film, Ethan Hawke plays Edward Dalton, a researcher in the year 2019, in which an unknown plague has transformed the world’s population into vampires. As the human population nears extinction, vampires must capture and farm every remaining human, or find a blood substitute before time runs out. However, a covert group of vampires makes a remarkable discovery, one that has the power to save the human race. – Lionsgate

It’s obvious why Lionsgate is rushing to finally put this in theaters this January as the vampire genre is hotter than ever, but as simply stated at the festival, this is NOT Twilight. If there was an opposite to that damn teen franchise, Daybreakers is it. These vampires are fierce, violent, heartless – and worst of all, when they don’t have blood they become horrible creatures of the night. In Daybreakers, vampire become the dominant species and have been capturing humans to harvest blood from. Obviously, they’re running out of blood, so their leader Charles Bromley (played by the incredible Sam Neill) has a research team looking for synthetic blood to sell on the market. Dalton, on the other hand, wants a cure.

While the plot has been done numerous times before on a smaller scale (like in Blade), what makes Daybreakers special is their new spin on the mythology. While these bloodsuckers can’t see their reflection and can’t go in the sun, they also turn into creatures when they don’t have blood. In addition to some various new rules, the “twist” that moves the plot is pretty great, but I won’t ruin it for you.

The screenplay, also by the Spierig brothers, was overly ambitious, especially for such a low budget horror film. The scope and magnitude of Daybreakers is beyond telling in one movie as it easily showed in the film. One such flaw is the development of the relationship between Charles Bromley and his daughter, who he wants more than anything to “convert” to vampirism. Instead of tying in a political message (like the idea that other vampires would look at him with a scorned eye if they knew his daughter was human), they just pass right over it in such a way it becomes a pace killer and wasted moment. In fact, a lot of the movie has this problem, which causes it to have some serious pacing issues (one of the major flaws). Another problem is that the script lacked a major villain and/or “end game boss.” The finale felt lackluster, as it never tried to top itself or do anything to make the climax feel like an actual climax. This isn’t Lord of the Rings guys….

Beyond the pacing issues and lack of character, the special FX work ranged from terrible to excellent. Even when poorly executed, the way the Spierig brothers shot the film hid the majority of the problems – and there were some moments of practical/CGI mixed bliss involving exploding heads and other random bloody goodness. While the way the Spierig brothers shot the film is a major part of its success, the cinematography by Ben Nott is out of this world making each and every scene look big, expensive and otherworldly.

While it’s far from perfect, Daybreakers is an incredibly fun movie. Loaded with talented actors (Sam Neill, Ethan Hawke and, of course, Willem DaFoe), beautiful camerawork (a stunning slow-mo shot in the finale proves this) and buckets of blood, I can’t recommend this enough. The Spierig brothers have officially proven themselves as competent and talented directors delivering a vampire film that won’t quickly be forgotten.

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Movies

‘The Invisible Man 2’ – Elisabeth Moss Says the Sequel Is Closer Than Ever to Happening

Published

on

Universal has been having a hell of a time getting their Universal Monsters brand back on a better path in the wake of the Dark Universe collapsing, with four movies thus far released in the years since The Mummy attempted to get that interconnected universe off the ground.

First was Leigh Whannell’s The Invisible Man, to date the only post-Mummy hit for the Universal Monsters, followed by The Last Voyage of the Demeter, Renfield, and now Abigail. The latter three films have attempted to bring Dracula back to the screen in fresh ways, but both Demeter and Renfield severely underperformed at the box office. And while Abigail is a far better vampire movie than those two, it’s unfortunately also struggling to turn a profit.

Where does the Universal Monsters brand go from here? The good news is that Universal and Blumhouse have once again enlisted the help of Leigh Whannell for their upcoming Wolf Man reboot, which is howling its way into theaters in January 2025. This is good news, of course, because Whannell’s Invisible Man was the best – and certainly most profitable – of the post-Dark Universe movies that Universal has been able to conjure up. The film ended its worldwide run with $144 million back in 2020, a massive win considering the $7 million budget.

Given the film was such a success, you may wondering why The Invisible Man 2 hasn’t come along in these past four years. But the wait for that sequel may be coming to an end.

Speaking with the Happy Sad Confused podcast this week, The Invisible Man star Elisabeth Moss notes that she feels “very good” about the sequel’s development at this point in time.

“Blumhouse and my production company [Love & Squalor Pictures]… we are closer than we have ever been to cracking it,” Moss updates this week. “And I feel very good about it.”

She adds, “We are very much intent on continuing that story.”

At the end of the 2020 movie, Elisabeth Moss’s heroine Cecilia Kass uses her stalker’s high-tech invisibility suit to kill him, now in possession of the technology that ruined her life.

Stay tuned for more on The Invisible Man 2 as we learn it.

[Related] Power Corrupts: Universal Monsters Classic ‘The Invisible Man’ at 90

Continue Reading