Connect with us

Movies

Animals (V)

“ANIMALS fails on every single level and left me in a state of shock. When it was all said and done I would have needed to fill an entire notebook to list all of the problems. I highly recommend watching this film only to witness what is one of the single worst horror movies ever made. Although difficult to make it from start to finish, it’s so bad that it actually becomes captivating.”

Published

on

I probably should have known what I was getting myself into when the director credit vanished off of the IMDB page for Anonymous Content’s ANIMALS, the highly anticipated adaptation of Craig Spector’s (A Nightmare on Elm Street: The Dream Child) novel, which he co-wrote with John Skipp. Still I think credit it due for Director Arnold Cassius (a pseudonym for Douglas Aarniokoski) who turns in quite possibly one of the worst horror films ever made.

The story centers on a blue-collar man in a dying factory town whose life is jolted after becoming involved in a romantic triangle amid a spate of uncontrolled violence.

With a massive budget and a cast consisting of “Lost” star Naveen Andrews and horror vet Nicki Aycox (Jeepers Creepers II, Dead Birds, Joy Ride 2), it’s hard to believe that the only redeeming value of the film is that you get to see Aycox naked not once, not twice, but three times. Even with a spectacle like that gracing the screen, you’ll still find yourself focusing on the many imperfections that make ANIMALS the epic disaster that it is. During a horribly staged sex scene in the rain, Aycox finds herself pinned up against a wall with her legs wrapped around her co-star’s face. As the duo are going at it like “animals”, you can literally see the water clotting up around the camera and pouring in front of the lens in clumps. While I can easily spend a good portion of this review marveling in the fact that Aycox chose ANIMALS to be her MONSTER’S BALL, I’ve got a few other eggs to fry.

ANIMALS is not only impossible to follow, but it’s also the most pretentious piece of crap I’ve ever witnessed; this film gives Uwe Boll a run for his money. While the stringing plotline is almost impossible to identify, the movie is loaded with flashes of cheesy ‘80s imagery, sex and blurry slow-motion scenes that should be banished from filmmaking altogether. When violence is about to occur, the camera shakes uncontrollably, when something is about to explode everything goes into slow-mo. The wolves in the movie look like the special FX company turned in some temp pre-vis work and the producers thought it was finished and accepted. The werewolves are the most half-assed shoddy attempt at special FX I have ever seen in a big budget movie. Think BLOOD AND CHOCOLATE, only there’s absolutely no definition in the wolves design. They’re like ghostly blue, blurry lumps of garbage.

ANIMALS is so bad that even the choreography is laughable as the ultra lame fist fights are about as captivating as watching grass grow. Furthermore, the set pieces looked cheap, crappy and completely unrealistic. I remember laughing my ass off when we saw the Sheriff with what looked like a paper badge taped to his uniform.

It’s difficult to identify exactly who is to blame for this atrocity, but I think that it’s safe to say Director Arnold Cassius has a huge hand in the problems… unless he wasn’t even on set (which wouldn’t be that shocking). If anything, he’s the director and I find it appalling as to how little creativity was displayed in ANIMALS.

ANIMALS fails on every single level and left me in a state of shock. When it was all said and done I would have needed to fill an entire notebook to list all of the problems. I highly recommend watching this film only to witness what is one of the single worst horror movies ever made. Although difficult to make it from start to finish, it’s so bad that it actually becomes captivating.

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Movies

’28 Years Later’ – Ralph Fiennes, Jodie Comer, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson Join Long Awaited Sequel

Published

on

28 Days Later, Ralph Fiennes in the Menu
Pictured: Ralph Fiennes in 'The Menu'

Danny Boyle and Alex Garland (AnnihilationMen), the director and writer behind 2002’s hit horror film 28 Days Later, are reteaming for the long-awaited sequel, 28 Years Later. THR reports that the sequel has cast Jodie Comer (Alone in the Dark, “Killing Eve”), Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Kraven the Hunter), and Ralph Fiennes (The Menu).

The plan is for Garland to write 28 Years Later and Boyle to direct, with Garland also planning on writing at least one more sequel to the franchise – director Nia DaCosta is currently in talks to helm the second installment.

No word on plot details as of this time, or who Comer, Taylor-Johnson, and Fiennes may play.

28 Days Later received a follow up in 2007 with 28 Weeks Later, which was executive produced by Boyle and Garland but directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. Now, the pair hope to launch a new trilogy with 28 Years Later. The plan is for Garland to write all three entries, with Boyle helming the first installment.

Boyle and Garland will also produce alongside original producer Andrew Macdonald and Peter Rice, the former head of Fox Searchlight Pictures, the division of one-time studio Twentieth Century Fox that originally backed the British-made movie and its sequel.

The original film starred Cillian Murphy “as a man who wakes up from a coma after a bicycle accident to find England now a desolate, post-apocalyptic collapse, thanks to a virus that turned its victims into raging killers. The man then navigates the landscape, meeting a survivor played by Naomie Harris and a maniacal army major, played by Christopher Eccleston.”

Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer) is on board as executive producer, though the actor isn’t set to appear in the film…yet.

Talks of a third installment in the franchise have been coming and going for the last several years now – at one point, it was going to be titled 28 Months Later – but it looks like this one is finally getting off the ground here in 2024 thanks to this casting news. Stay tuned for more updates soon!

Continue Reading