Connect with us

Movies

Entrance

“On a technical level with regards to its slasher elements, ‘Entrance‘ is a pretty great flick… Slasher fans who are sick of the same old “5-6 kids in a car” scenarios should seek it out once it becomes available.”

Published

on

On a technical level with regards to its slasher elements, Entrance is a pretty great flick. There are a couple of earned jolts, some surprisingly good kills, and a slow burn creepiness not unlike The Strangers or Ils, not to mention the creative approach – our “Final Girl” is in every single frame of the film, which doesn’t allow for her slutty best friend to go off alone or even cutaways during the scare scenes. By design the slasher film is a fairly limited concept, so anytime I can walk away impressed by how the filmmakers handled their well-worn material on the directorial side of things, I am happy.

However from a storytelling angle the film sort of misses the boat. It’s not a very long film (80 and some change with credits) but it is padded to a fault, particularly in the first act before the stalker/slasher elements kick in. The idea is to show us how lonely life is becoming for our heroine Suziey (Suziey Block), but we get the point long before the filmmakers think we do. Whereas we only need to see her “normal” (read: boring) day twice to get the idea that nothing much happens to her, they show us certain parts of it four or even five times. What kicks the “plot” into gear is when her dog disappears, and from then on they go easier on the repetition, but getting there might be too much for an audience, especially for a film most folks will be watching at home, not in a theater where you can’t fast forward (or just walk out if you’re an asshole).

Luckily, Block is an engaging presence, and her character is likable enough to follow. She’s not particularly interesting, but that’s part of the point, so it’s not a big deal that you don’t get to know too much about her by the time the end comes. And to be fair, she loses her dog, which is pretty much the easiest way to earn someone’s sympathy, or at least mine. There’s a bit where she comes home and looks down at the floor, seeing no one to greet her, and I almost choked up, but it’s not a manipulative storytelling decision like in some other films; I was already liking her character before the little guy vanished.

And by vanished I mean “was taken”. Again, with Block in every single frame of the film (I honestly do not think I am exaggerating; if she exits the frame it’s not for more than a second or two) they could have botched the possibility for scares (we never even really get a good look at her stalker), but just about every major horror scene works great. The “dognapping” bit in particular was creepy as all hell, because it plays out entirely through sound design, with the guy making those ticking sounds you make when you call for an animal and the dog pattering about and then whimpering, all while we watch poor Suziey sleep. The movie’s largely unimpressive HD look gives away its obviously low budget at every turn (oddly no one asked the budget at the post Q&A, a rarity for a festival screening), but the sound design was top notch at times.

I also liked the simple look of the killer; his mask was sort of like the Cherub from Valentine, but with typical hipster garb instead of the black overcoat. And by keeping him sort of out of focus or in shadow, they got a bit of that old school Halloween vibe that I always like, especially in this modern day where the killers are so front and center for most of the movie and thus lose all of their mystique before the second half, let alone a sequel. As for the kills, we don’t get to see too many, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t effective. I don’t want to get too spoiler-y since the movie isn’t out yet and it’s probably a one time only type deal for most people (including me, though I’d listen to a commentary for sure), but the final 22 minutes, when the slasher stuff really hits the fan, is all one “unbroken” shot (edits hidden by camera movement), and there’s a great balance between on-screen (surprisingly vicious) kills and “find the dead friends”, and it works great I thought, with poor Block running around both gagged and with her hands tied behind her back. The ultimate denouement is a bit of a letdown, though I was too impressed with the technical qualities of how they pulled off the entire climax of their film to get too annoyed by it.

One thing I thought was a bit odd, though I assume it was a budgetary issue – we don’t really see a lot of Los Angeles. Part of the theme of the film is how LA can be a lonely place, and how despite that you should love it (it borders on Haggis’ Crash at times; luckily the killer stopped short of outright saying he was killing people just to make a connection), but we only see a tiny bit of Silverlake and a few shots of Sunset Blvd and what I think was the Skirball overpass on the 405. I mean, they don’t need to go all out and show her going to the Tar Pits and a Dodger game, but I’m not sure how well this aspect of the story will come across to someone who doesn’t live here. Unlike other major cities, LA is very spread out, with traffic and a near useless subway system making people without cars (as Suziey is, due to a breakdown she can’t afford to fix) sort of helpless – this might not make sense to folks who assume LA is like Manhattan or Chicago and thus not having a car isn’t much of an issue.

Like most festival films, there is no distribution in place for it yet, and I can’t see the big studios fighting over rights to a strange little indie slasher, but hopefully it will find a home with Magnet or IFC and find its audience on VOD or whatever. I can’t say for sure that I would have been as impressed had I not seen 240+ (mostly lousy/generic) slashers in the past few years, because just about all my enjoyment stemmed from the unique approach in how it was shot (the script would have probably bored me to sleep after 10 pages). Slasher fans who are sick of the same old “5-6 kids in a car” scenarios should seek it out once it becomes available. And I’m sort of tickled by the idea of someone watching it someday without knowing it was a slasher, assuming it was yet another indie “girl finds herself” comi-drama, only to get their mind blown when a dude takes a pair of scissors to one of her friends’ heads.

Visit BC’s Horror Movie A Day for more.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Movies

‘Byte’ Trailer – Indie Horror Movie Downloads an App That Turns People into Werewolves

Published

on

In the wake of Larry Fessenden’s werewolf movie Blackout releasing at home just last week, werewolf horror returns with the indie film Byte being unleashed later this week.

After its world premiere at the HorrorHound Film Festival in March, we’ve learned that Byte will be available April 18 on streaming platforms. Watch the official trailer below.

“In a concept generated for today’s Gen Z audience, the film follows a group of college-aged friends who become concerned when one of them discovers a mysterious phone app that turns users into werewolves. Meanwhile, a spate of violent killings plagues the city.”

Kayden Bryce, Marshall Vargas, Carlie Allen, Stephen Nicholas Knight, Debbie Scaletta, Bill Schroeder, Cali Jacobs, Candela Orio, Amanda Yanzanny, and Chris Hahn star.

Eddie Lengyel (Mother Krampus 2, American Poltergeist: The Curse of Lilith Ratchet) directs and produces from his screenplay. Fellow producer is Marie Lengyel. Jeff Miller (Ouija House) and Ronnie D. Lee (The Toybox) executive produce. Mick Kunz shot and edited the film.

“I think our concept of ‘technology meets werewolves’ is something audiences will dig,” producer Jeff Miller said in a statement. “Grab a pizza, sit back, and enjoy!”

Byte is a co-production between Millman Productions, Fright Teck Pictures, and Ron Lee Productions. In addition to the trailer, you’ll also find the upcoming film’s poster art below.

Continue Reading