Connect with us

Movies

Ghoul (TV)

“With children engaging problems that would traumatize adults, and an acoustically driven soundtrack by Sean Spillane, Ghoul feels very much like a less offensive version of something between The Woman and The Girl Next Door. Brian Keene’s Ghoul may not be the visceral Ketchum-type pummeling some have come to expect from a Moderncine production, but it stands among them no less their sibling as it furthers their ever widening reputation for premium adaptations from the horror section of your local book store.”

Published

on

Three best friends are homebound and ready to spend summer vacation in a cool new, secret underground fort they’ve dug at the local cemetery. Each of these kids carries a heavy burden. One is being molested, the other beaten – and Timmy (played by Nolan Gould of Modern Family) just lost his grandfather to a heart attack. And as bad as that all is, its about to get a hell of a lot worse.

That’s the skeleton to Brian Keene’s Ghoul, the latest book adaptation by Moderncine (Offspring, The Woman) and more specifically a lot of the team that brought you The Girl Next Door. Directed by Greg Wilson and penned for the screen by William M. Miller, it was specially crafted for a cable horror run on the Chiller network – and will be making its debut there on April 13, 2012.

If you’re not familiar with the bulk of Brian Keene’s novel, this is a story about kids. Make no mistake – you’ll spend 90% of your time with kids, and if The Girl Next Door made you think of Stand By Me, this will even more. But the subject matter here is adult. Very adult, and domestically black. Timmy is grieving after losing a grandfather who was very close to him. Doug (Jacob Bila) has to fight off his drunken mother at night, and admits to his best friend that his she molests him on a regular basis. Barry (Trevor Harker) must deal with the beatings dished out to him and his mother, from an angry, drunken and abusive father, Clark, who also runs the cemetery.

Those who have read the novel know that there is a story behind Clark’s unrest and inner torment – and this is where Brian Keene’s Ghoul and Greg Wilson’s Ghoul will branch off in different directions. While the bulk of the plot from start to finish is about the same, it would be inaccurate to label this a “strict” adaptation, as certain elements and fluids have been changed. I will leave it for faithful to decide if this is good or not, but if nothing else, it gives fans of the novel a new mysterious direction to look forward to.

To give any more away would rob this movie of the tale is stands to tell, and Ghoul has a lot to say. Aside from the fact that “the ghoul” ties this story together and gives this feature its adhesion, it could almost exist without it – as the bulk of Ghoul is a coming-of-age horror story infected deeply by the domestic hells these young characters are dealing with. Sometimes it feels a bit heavy on the After School Special material, but put within the context of what this is – a made-for-TV movie – it has an unusually rich plot and very deep, well-played characters to build upon. Everyone involved on the acting side, especially Barry Corbin (No Country For Old Men) as Timmy’s grandfather, make an otherwise over-dysfunctional drama work. The overall ghoul violence is few and far between, but when it goes down, FX artist Anthony Pepe delivers some respectably inferred violence and gore for what could be allowed.

As so often explored by Moderncine creations such as The Girl Net Door, Offspring, or The Woman – what worse beast is there, than man? Genre crawlers looking to see a corpse eating beast or rape scenes in the tunnels beneath the graveyard should take note – this is not a hard-R film. This is an above-par PG style production from top to bottom – and it raises the bar for what should be expected from the cable-destined horror-feature scene, whose reputation SyFy has smeared with piss poor, Asylum-like productions. With children engaging problems that would traumatize adults, and an acoustically driven soundtrack by Sean Spillane, Ghoul feels very much like a less offensive version of something between The Woman and The Girl Next Door. Brian Keene’s Ghoul may not be the visceral Ketchum-type pummeling some have come to expect from a Moderncine production, but it stands among them no less their sibling as it furthers their ever widening reputation for premium adaptations from the horror section of your local book store.

Advertisement
2 Comments

Editorials

‘Malevolence’: The Overlooked Mid-2000s Love Letter to John Carpenter’s ‘Halloween’

Published

on

Written and Directed by Stevan Mena on a budget of around $200,000, Malevolence was only released in ten theaters after it was purchased by Anchor Bay and released direct-to-DVD like so many other indie horrors. This one has many of the same pratfalls as its bargain bin brethren, which have probably helped to keep it hidden all these years. But it also has some unforgettable moments that will make horror fans (especially fans of the original Halloween) smile and point at the TV like Leonardo DiCaprio in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

Malevolence is the story of a silent and masked killer told through the lens of a group of bank robbers hiding out after a score. The bank robbery is only experienced audibly from the outside of the bank, but whether the film has the budgetary means to handle this portion well or not, the idea of mixing a bank robbery tale into a masked slasher movie is a strong one.

Of course, the bank robbery goes wrong and the crew is split up. Once the table is fully set, we have three bank robbers, an innocent mom and her young daughter as hostages, and a masked man lurking in the shadows who looks like a mix between baghead Jason from Friday the 13th Part 2 and the killer from The Town That Dreaded Sundown. Let the slashing begin.

Many films have tried to recreate the aesthetic notes of John Carpenter’s 1978 classic Halloween, and at its best Malevolence is the equivalent of a shockingly good cover song.

Though the acting and script are at times lacking, the direction, score, and cinematography come together for little moments of old-school slasher goodness that will send tingles up your spine. It’s no Halloween, to be clear, but it does Halloween reasonably proud. The nighttime shots come lit with the same blue lighting and the musical notes of the score pop off at such specific moments, fans might find themselves laughing out loud at the absurdity of how hard the homages hit. When the killer jumps into frame, accompanied by the aforementioned musical notes, he does so sharply and with the same slow intensity as Michael Myers. Other films in the subgenre (and even a few in the Halloween franchise) will tell you this isn’t an easy thing to duplicate.

The production and costume designs of Malevolence hint at love letters to other classic horror films as well. The country location not only provides for an opening Halloween IV fans will appreciate but the abandoned meat plant and the furnishings inside make for some great callbacks to 1974’s The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. All of this is buoyed and accentuated by cinematography that you rarely see in today’s low-budget films. The film is shot on 35mm film by A&E documentary filmmaker Tsuyoshi Kimono, who gives Malevolence an old-school, grainy, 1970s aesthetic that feels completely natural and not like a cheap gimmick.

Malevolence is a movie that no doubt has some glaring imperfections but it is also a movie that is peppered with moments of potential. There’s a reason they made a follow-up prequel titled Malevolence 2: Bereavement years later (and another after that) that starred both Michael Biehn and Alexandra Daddario! That film tells the origin story of our baghead, Martin Bristol. Something the first film touches on a little bit, at least enough to give you the gist of what happened here. Long story short, a six-year-old boy was kidnapped by a serial killer and for years forced to watch him hunt, torture, and kill his victims. Which brings me to another fascinating aspect of Malevolence. The ending. SPOILER WARNING.

After the mother and child are saved from the killer, our slasher is gone, his bloody mask left on the floor. The camera pans around different areas of the town, showing all the places he may be lurking. If you’re down with the fact that it’s pretty obvious this is all an intentional love letter and not a bad rip-off, it’s pretty fun. Where Malevolence makes its own mark is in the true crime moments to follow. Law enforcement officers pull up to the plant and uncover a multitude of horrors. They find the notebooks of the original killer, which explain that he kidnapped the boy, taught him how to hunt, and was now being hunted by him. This also happened to be his final entry. We discover a hauntingly long line of bodies covered in white sheets: the bodies of the many missing persons the town had for years been searching for. And there are a whole lot of them. This moment really adds a cool layer of serial killer creepiness to the film.

Ultimately, Malevolence is a low-budget movie with some obvious deficiencies on full display. Enough of them that I can imagine many viewers giving up on the film before they get to what makes it so special, which probably explains how it has gone so far under the radar all these years. But the film is a wonderful ode to slashers that have come before it and still finds a way to bring an originality of its own by tying a bank robbery story into a slasher affair. Give Malevolence a chance the next time you’re in the mood for a nice little old school slasher movie.

Malevolence is now streaming on Tubi and Peacock.

Continue Reading