Connect with us

Editorials

In Defense Of Holiday Edition: ‘Black Christmas’ (Remake)

Published

on

Tis the season to talk about horror Christmas movies! It’s a constantly growing sub-genre with quite possibly the most, lowest rated horror movies of any subgenre. Today I want to revisit a movie that’s not only a Christmas Horror but also a remake (a remake of a widely adored horror movie no less) and well, I think it’s just great!

Black Christmas hit theaters on Christmas day 8 years ago and effectively brought Christmas horror back to audiences on a wider scale. It gets an abysmal 14% on Rotten Tomatoes so it’s pretty safe to say the remake of Black Christmas, wasn’t well received. But why? In order to enjoy this film I think you might have to remove yourself from Bob Clark’s original. Yes, the original Black Christmas is a staple of the horror genre in the 70s and for good reason, but there is still a lot of merit to the remake.

Before we get started, for those of you who somehow missed both films here’s a brief synopsis: While several sorority girls are snowed in for the evening they begin getting obscene and disturbing phone calls. The girls are terrorized and killed off one by one by the caller. Pretty simple plot and it remains roughly the same in both films.

Black-Christmas-2006-1

Now, there are some differences in the plot that may be why people tend to dislike it. In the remake, the girls are terrorized by a caller but instead of it being some maniacal stranger the caller is given a back story (a recently growing phenomenon in the remake biz). Poor little Billy Lenz was doomed from early childhood to grow up a freak, he had perpetually yellow skin and his mother hated him. After disposing of the only person who ever loved Billy, his father, Mrs. Lenz soon remarries to get the child she always wanted. To make matters even worse for Billy, his mother’s new beau isn’t living up to his role as baby maker so she turns to Billy himself. She soon gets pregnant but her happiness is short lived when Billy attacks the child and his mother, but not before preheating the oven to make special human Christmas cookies.

As I said, you may need to remove yourself from the original to really be able to enjoy this flick. It came out when I was in high school so I hadn’t yet seen the original when I first watched the remake. If it hadn’t been a remake I think this would have been a lot more successful with horror fans. For one, it is one of the few horror films that have come out in the past 15 years to hold an “R” rating. And it’s a pretty hard “R”. We are constantly swimming in a sea of “PG-13” travesties that it’s kind of nice to sit back and enjoy a blood drenched “R” rated horror movie.

Speaking of blood, I want to point out that Black Christmas really kicked up the gore for the remake. It’s a full blown slasher from the minute it starts and it doesn’t let up until the credits roll. With each kill the audience gets a bucket of blood to go along with it. Being a gore hound myself, I loved it! I understand that some fans might be thrown off because of this drastic shift in tone from the original but Billy really does bring it home for the body count.

Black Christmas head

So, yes, the tone is extremely different but it was a change that director Glen Morgan made to get asses in seats. I wish the atmospheric horror of the 70s would make a comeback but current generations just don’t seem to give as much money to those. So creative decisions had to be made and Morgan opted for a more vibrant and fast paced story.

I want to take a minute to acknowledge the leading ladies of this film. Sure, I did miss Margot Kidder and Olivia Hussey on my recent viewing of this but I think there is something to be said about the girls in this film. The cast consists of Katie Cassidy, Michelle Trachtenberg, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, and Lacey Chabert. Each of these girls brings their own spin to the “sorority girl”   persona and the result we get is a cast of girls who you actually start to like. At least I did. They aren’t your typical dumb/bitchy girls that are usually portrayed, instead they are resourceful and put up a damn good fight against their attacker. Yeah, Lacey Cahbret plays her typical Mean Girls role but even that’s entertaining.

And speaking of entertaining, this movie is just plain fun. It’s crammed full Christmas imagery to get you feeling festive and it’s got a nice grain of humor to it as well. Often in slasher movies it’s easy to get bored or distracted when someone isn’t getting gutted but in Black Christmas there is always something to amuse you. Between the incredibly creepy phone calls (just as creepy as the original even) and the banter between the girls, I was never bored.

So who else likes this holiday treat? I can’t be the only one. Give it a watch, or a re-watch, and come back and let me know what you thought!

Jess is a Northeast Ohio native who has loved all things horror and fringe since birth. She has a tendency to run at the mouth about it and decided writing was the only way not to scare everyone away. If you make a hobby into a career it becomes less creepy. Unless that hobby is collecting baby dolls. Nothing makes that less creepy.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading