[Interview] ‘The Thing 2011′ Screenwriter Explains How The Film Transformed Into What You Saw!!!
![[Interview] The Thing 2011 Screenwriter Explains How The Film Transformed Into What You Saw!!! ThingLand101611 [Interview] The Thing 2011 Screenwriter Explains How The Film Transformed Into What You Saw!!!](http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/photosizer/upload/ThingLand101611.jpg)
So The Thing (user reviews) opened over the weekend to somewhat disappointing box office and mixed-to-negative reviews. I’ve seen the film twice now, once a couple of months ago and again two weeks back and I had issues with it on each viewing. My deep love of John Carpenter’s 1982 film was my baggage and cross to bear during my first viewing. There were certainly things I liked in this new prequel but I honestly didn’t know what my true feelings about it were. The second time I saw the film I feel like I was in a better position to divorce myself from that baggage and assess The Thing 2011 on its own merits. I tried to force myself to see how it worked just as a standalone movie – and I still had some issues. Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Joel Edgerton give good performances and there’s some cool ideas in the movie (I like it more than some of my peers) but the CG, pacing and editorial aspects never fully come together.
Of course it was never going to be as good as the 1982 John Carpenter film. No way. Not only is it so aesthetically similar to that film that it invites unfavorable comparisons, but the studio climate today doesn’t really allow slow burn movies like that to happen anymore. Remakes, sequels and prequels are considered to be “safe” investments (though after Fright Night and this… perhaps less so) and the “film by committee” syndrome is often more evident in movies like these than other studio films where new ideas can fly under the radar because they’re not yet considered valuable properties.
That’s not to say every finger should be pointed at Universal. Filmmakers are filmmakers no matter what circumstance they’re working under and sometimes part of the job is to successfully advocate for your film in that environment. If you want to own what works, you have to own what doesn’t work. And that’s ultimately how I feel about the film. Some some of it works and some of it doesn’t.
A few weeks ago I sat down with Eric Heisserer, the film’s screenwriter, for a frank chat about what does and doesn’t work in The Thing 2011. It was quite clear that he’s just as big of a fan as Carpenter’s film as anyone else and was concerned with doing it justice. He was also extremely generous with his time and we wound up talking for 90 minutes so I can only give a few highlights. Beware – this entire interview should be considered a SPOILER.
“I can tell you that we had originally planned for a slow boil of a movie. We had a lot more character work.”
Hit the jump to check it out.
READ MORE
![[Set Report] Reintroducing Our Trip to Toronto for The Thing hiresthething093011 [Set Report] Reintroducing Our Trip to Toronto for The Thing](http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/photosizer/upload/hiresthething093011.jpg)
![[Interview] Joel Edgerton on Paranoia and Staying True To Carpenter In The Thing! Edgerland92311 [Interview] Joel Edgerton on Paranoia and Staying True To Carpenter In The Thing!](http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/photosizer/upload/Edgerland92311.jpg)






















[Remember This?] What Movies Are You Afraid Suck Now?