Lol, sounds like it is going to be as weak as the original, in terms of directors non existent history crafting skills. That is maybe why they have to rely on something that was already made as a start, instead of plotting a story from the start.
Thank you and have a nice week

Oh well. Just another defensive neckbeard that can’t love something while embracing it’s flaws. You have to go and pretend it’s perfect because your ego is so attached to it.

Psychomantis18 already did and you ignored it so not gonna bother. Your using that pro critics agree shows me everything I need to know bout you. Why would anyone worry about be judged on bd comments section ? That’s laughable man.

Gonna respond about your Retarded Romero comments or you just gonna cherry pick what you respond to

Step up to the plate then. Explain the answers to my questions. I’m not alone here. Professional critics have said the same thing. MOST people say the same thing. Only the super-defensive neck-beards that are worried about being judged rise up with this “NYAH YOU JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND IT” line, while mysteriously never bothering to enlighten the unwashed masses.

Anyone with a basic understanding of film knows that Supsiria has a suck-tastic plot that is just a delivery device for all the kill scenes. There is no logic or motivation for anything going on in this film except the old “A Wizard Did It” trope, only replace “Wizard” with “Witch”.

Not understanding the plot does not = incoherent plot

The astonishing revelation that if you take away the two best parts of a movie, you’re left with a worse movie.

Okay.

Nice try, simpleton.

As your entire profile shows, you’re all talk and no substance.

You’re a little slow; guess you consider Lynch films to be plotless also.

I’m happy to waste time on idiots, but when they are cluelessly arrogant – nup.

Bye bye, Chip.

The film fails to explain
1. Who the fuck is this Suzie, and why do we care?
2. Why is there a coven at this specific school?
3. What is the coven and the Madam’s goals? They seem to kill for arbitrary reasons.
4. There’s some vague notions of Suzie being prepared as a sacrifice, but why her specifically, and what are the outcomes? Eternal life? The power t cast a particular spell? She already seems to have the power to raise the dead at will, what does she need to go after Suzie for?

There are countless other questions because the plot of Suspiria doesn’t really try to be a coherent plot. It’s a backdrop for that amazing imagery. So get off your fucking high horse, neck-beard. Suspiria is a visual masterpiece, but the plot is severely lacking in any sense of storytelling strength. You could just watch a super cut of certain scenes and miss absolutely nothing of value from the experience.

As you’re unable to wiki or google the plot summary, here’s a basic rundown –

Suzie goes to a ballet school where people die and weird shit happens at night leading to her discovery that the school is run by a coven of witches who are housing the original owner of the building and head witch – the sick and decrepit Helena. Suzie kills her, destroying the coven and the building in the process. The end.

That is the only summary you’ll have me waste time on, the rest you can google to undermine your invalid points.

I’m waiting for an answer then. Educate me. Prove your stance.

Are you arguing with a straight face that indie studios don’t want to make money?

That’s my problem with not using primary colors in the palette. It will look like every other damn movie out there, awash in drab tones. In other words, it will look boring as hell.

You know.. not understanding the plot to his films and then jumping online to brandish this ignorance doesn’t make them incoherent, but it does make you an obnoxious fool.

Incoherent, and meandering.

Why are you thinking about things like remaking 3 movies that have already been made brilliantly twice?
Dont be gross

If somebody wants to do a remake,
let them remake something that was only okay before or hasn’t been remade before, that they can actually improve on

Not just rip-off, dumb down, swap the races and genders and throw cgi at it to cash in on somebody else’s hard work and reputation that created a classic

Theres PLENTY of sci-Fi movies from the 50’s drive in days that someone could get the rights to and start with as a jumping off point for improvement as a remake

I just cant get into giallo, or fulci or argento either

I’m not sure why I just dont get it?

Maybe I’m just too crude and American

Stop posting drivel and i’ll stop pointing it out for the drivel it is- simple.

All I do is represent my arguments which, unlike you, are not brainlessly based on popular view or an underdeveloped pair of testicles.

And to address your recent display of idiocy, referencing a writers previous review in order to undermine their current stance on a subject is totally valid.

If someone told you their fav albums were made up of releases by the Spice Girls, Britney Spears, and TLC, and then recommended an album unknown to you, you’d be keen?

Sarcasm…

Ummm.. how bout Suspiria..

I agree. I remember reading about what was going to happen in the film and thinking that it was going to be the most brutal, scary thing ever, only to have the direction, editing and cinematography end up dramatically undermining the horror.

The prequel to the remake, however, I seem to recall quite enjoying ( a few, relatively minor, issue aside).

I guess what I’m saying is – Eh, why not let someone else take a swing at SUSPIRIA? If it sucks, it sucks. When remakes suck they pretty much just go away, they never seem to replace or tarnish the originals (if anything, when a remake sucks, it seems to make everyone appreciate the original that much more).

xD

Boogie Woogie! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e34d0a152e744103d5d67d2a8e300f6fe9fc2ea0d0df7e9255ff28772caef372.jpg

Holy hell, there is actually somebody else who thought it was doodie.

OOh, stop it. You’re frightening me.

Makes perfect sense.

Not everyone loves the same thing though, hence –

Say ‘no’ to remakes.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong then. Explain the merit of an Argento’s plot. Name one with a coherent plot.

This exactly. The point of a remake SHOULD be to take the idea and improve it. Take what people love, in this case the visuals/colours, the amazing score etc…and try to improve on that, the story and everything else. If not, just make a new movie with a different name. I’m extremely disappointed.

Unfortunately people would still complain. It’s what we do.

Gotcha, carry on.

I just wanted to expand on the “girl wanding around” criticism but didn’t do it very well as it comes across like I’m taking aim at psychomantis, but I’m actually agreeing!

You’re not only wrong, you’re a dick too. How’s that?

I think that’s the point here .