Connect with us

Editorials

‘Hellbent’ is a Halloween Slasher Film That’s Fit to Slay

Published

on

Hellbent Horror Queers

Everyone knows that there’s no shortage of horror movies, and more specifically Halloween horror flicks, to screen on All Hallows Eve. If, however, you’re looking for an unconventional choice, look no further than Paul Etheredge’s Hellbent, the self-proclaimed “first gay slasher film”. Shot on location over two consecutive years during West Hollywood’s infamous Halloween parade, writer/director Etheredge’s low budget queer slasher film Hellbent wound up with its unique moniker when it was released in 2004.

Set over a single tumultuous Halloween night in West Hollywood, the film follows a group of five men who dress up in quintessential gay costumes (cop, cowboy, leather, drag) and set out for a night of drinking and partying, only to find themselves stalked and murdered by a masked killer. The fact that the entire core cast is comprised of queer characters (4 gay men, 1 bisexual man) helps to make Hellbent distinct. Even its killer is (arguably) queer.

The protagonist is Eddie (Dylan Fergus), a reserved, verging-on-virginal young man who dreamed about being a police officer like his father until he failed the physical due to a childhood eye injury (naturally the impairment winds up playing an instrumental role in the film’s plot).

Eddie is joined by sexually frustrated twink Joey (Hank Harris), beefy model Tobey (Matt Philipps) and Chaz (Andrew Levitas), the group’s most sexually active member and its resident bisexual. Chaz’s clown car-like introduction, wherein both a man and a woman climb out of his backseat, reinforces Hellbent’s sexually progressive stance, as well as its cheeky sense of humour.

Early in the film Eddie spots the object of his affection, Jake (Bryan Kirkwood) who is we immediately identify as a “bad boy” courtesy of visual signifiers such as his motorcycle and tattoos. The meet/cute between the men verges on romantic-comedy territory, and refreshingly serves as Hellbent’s emotional foundation. Where other slashers (and several of Eddie’s companion) focus on sexual conquests, there’s something undeniably charming about Eddie and Jake’s flirtatious “will they/won’t they” courtship.

Hellbent Horror Queers

In true slasher form, Etheredge opens the film with an urban legend-inspired death set piece in which a pair of lovers lose their heads during a hot and heavy car make-out in the woods. The buff masked killer (Luke Weaver), who is never named and does not speak, is referred to as the Devil Daddy because he is older and for his trademark red Halloween face mask and scythe. Not unlike another famous silent Shape, Hellbent encourages multiple readings for the Devil Daddy’s killer motivation. Some have speculated that he is a homophobic villain out to kill queer men; others read him as a repressed gay man who lashes out at sexually active members of the community that he is unable to join.

Whatever the reason, Devil Daddy fixates on our quartet after they capture his attention with an ill-advised prank in the woods en route to the parade. From that moment on, he stalks and murders them in gruesome fashion, including an infamous bathroom attack, a strobe-lit slash fest on the dance floor, and an alleyway plea deal.

The sexually-charged, queer-designated murder locations and the integration of gay elements into slasher tropes make for a fascinating critical reading (which Trace Thurman and I tackled during our Horror Queers discussion back in June). And while Hellbent isn’t without its flaws (its visual aesthetic is a little cheap and the film’s narrow depiction of queer lifestyles is exclusively focused on young, white, buff men), but its importance in queer horror cinema history remains undeniable. The film may have earned its “first gay slasher” label in part to help sales on the LGBTQ film festival circuit, but to this day, Hellbent remains unparalleled in its inclusivity. No other slasher film is so unabashedly gay.

Regardless of its politics and its place in history, the film is easily enjoyed as a “straight” forward slasher thanks to its close adherence to familiar character types and the conventions of the subgenre. As a counterpoint to traditional seasonal horror picks, Hellbent is a Halloween slasher film that’s fit to slay.

Joe is a TV addict with a background in Film Studies. He co-created TV/Film Fest blog QueerHorrorMovies and writes for Bloody Disgusting, Anatomy of a Scream, That Shelf, The Spool and Grim Magazine. He enjoys graphic novels, dark beer and plays multiple sports (adequately, never exceptionally). While he loves all horror, if given a choice, Joe always opts for slashers and creature features.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading