Connect with us

Editorials

‘Happy Death Day’ Heroine Tree Gelbman is the Perfect Survivor Girl for a Whole New Generation

Published

on

It’s 2019. And final girls have done some growing up.

Watching Happy Death Day back in October 2017, it was immediately clear that I was witnessing the rise of a whole new type of “final girl,” one played with such manic, all-in gusto by star-in-the-making Jessica Rothe that I knew, without the need for any sort of hindsight, that Rothe had become an instant “scream queen.” Her Tree Gelbman? An instant horror icon.

If that wasn’t clear then, it’s damn sure crystal clear now.

What’s truly special about this franchise’s lead, who’s currently dying over and over again up on the big screen once more in Happy Death Day 2U, is that she’s quite unlike the “final girls” of the past. Throughout the 1980s, the “final girl” was defined almost exclusively by her triumphant survival at the end of a slasher film, the often-virginal “good girl” who proves to be the only one worthy of vanquishing the big bad. But as Meagan pointed out in her recent piece “10 Modern Final Girls Who Changed the Formula,” Tree isn’t actually the “good girl” at all.

At the start of Happy Death Day, Tree is (in Meagan’s words) a “ruthless sorority sister with a long list of enemies,” making her the sort of character who would, in any other slasher movie, be killed off before the final act. And we’d cheer at her demise. But the Groundhog Day-inspired Happy Death Day isn’t any other slasher movie. And Tree isn’t any other slasher character. Rather, Tree cleverly evolves through the first film from a body count victim to the classic “final girl” – ironically, she must die multiple times in order to earn that status.

Go figure, eh?

Tree’s unique arc puts a spin on the typical “final girl” trope, making her a new sort of heroine for a whole new generation. A generation that does better by its female characters than the generations of the past, quite honestly. Horror films – slashers in particular – have always excelled at giving us female leads who eventually embody the term “badass,” but Tree is not the sort of character who’s defined by the weapon she picks up or the killer she slays. She’s not just a “survivor girl,” but rather a rich, complex character who’s written and performed with great emotional depth. She doesn’t defeat the central character. She *is* the central character.

In Happy Death Day, it’s not just about Tree bravely killing off the masked maniac and surviving until the end of the film. Quite the opposite, really. It’s about Tree *dying* repeatedly in order to learn from her mistakes and grow as a character. And in Happy Death Day 2U, which takes that personal growth an emotional step further, it’s about Tree literally killing herself, repeatedly, on this same quest for growth and evolution. It’s what kills her that makes her stronger.

While many films take a surface level approach to their “strong female characters,” imbuing them with literal strength but little else, the Happy Death Day movies present a heroine so wonderfully and completely realized that this may very well be the first ever slasher franchise with a “final girl” character as the main selling point. A character who evolves. A character who, with each new film thus far, becomes a better person right before our eyes. On a very relatable level, a horror heroine to look up to and draw inspiration from. And at a time when there’s so much cruelty being thrown around on a daily basis, we could all use a character like Tree to remind us that it’s never too late to be better to ourselves and to those around us.

Arguably, Tree’s most heroic moments have nothing to do with the handguns and axes she wields. Rather, her true heroism comes in the form of inspirational life wisdom she attains from quite literally living the same day over and over again, which she dishes out to a closeted schoolmate in the first film and a roommate making bad decisions in the second. None of us can relate to a camp counselor cutting off the head of a vengeful mother out to kill her, but Tree’s trials, tribulations and triumphs impart a wellspring of qualities we can draw from.

When you buy a ticket to see a Happy Death Day movie, you’re not paying to see “Babyface” or to watch attractive young people get brutally dispatched. You’re paying to see a new slasher icon: a flawed young woman who’s just trying to be the best version of herself that she can be. And never had that been more clear to me than during the opening 10 minutes of Happy Death Day 2U, which delay the return of Tree by instead focusing on actor Phi Vu’s Ryan Phan. In this opening sequence, Ryan finds himself in his own time loop, pursued by an unknown killer wearing the “Babyface” mask. Without Tree, quite honestly, the movie kicks off on a pretty lackluster note, cementing my personal belief that Happy Death Day is one franchise that simply could never continue without her. Other slasher franchises soldiered on without their leading ladies, but I just don’t think there’s anything to Happy Death Day without Tree.

Final girls aren’t just surviving anymore. With Tree as a new trailblazer, joined by a returning Laurie Strode just last year, they’re finally taking over the whole damn sub-genre.

And it’s about time.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading