Connect with us

Editorials

Brazil’s Master of Horror: Celebrating José Mojica Marins and the Legacy of Coffin Joe

Published

on

From Alfred Hitchcock’s infamous cameos to Stephen King literally writing himself into the Dark Tower series, it’s not uncommon for creators to insert themselves into their art. Of course, there’s a difference between simply appearing in your work and becoming the main attraction, and that’s why José Mojica Marins stands out as one of the most daring genre filmmakers of all time. Spawning a multi-media franchise from a tiny b-picture filmed in the heart of 1960s Brazil, Mojica’s subversive storytelling earned him worldwide notoriety during a time when most horror movies still hesitated to show blood on celluloid.

While this month marks a year since this Master of Horror left us mortals behind, the legacy of Coffin Joe lives on. That’s why I’d like to take a moment to appreciate Brazil’s greatest contribution to genre cinema.

Mojica became a household name with 1964’s At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul, but his passion for film began much earlier. Born on a Friday the 13th to parents who owned a local movie theater, this young man seemed destined to pursue a career in genre filmmaking. Having already produced a handful of low-budget drama films, the idea to make Brazil’s first ever horror movie came to him after a vivid nightmare where a dark figure dragged Mojica to his grave, showing him the date of his inescapable death.

This disturbing incident inspired the creation of Coffin Joe (also known as Josefel Zanatas), an intimidating amalgamation of Nietzschean nihilism and Brazilian social anxieties. With his vampiric demeanor and shocking speeches, this unholy undertaker has been terrifying audiences for decades, forever searching for an heir to carry on his legacy.

Ironically, Mojica never intended to be the face of his creation, only donning the iconic top-hat and claws once the original lead actor abandoned the project, objecting to the character’s exaggerated features. This was probably for the best, as Mojica’s theatrical presence and odd appearance complement his peculiar direction. The unnaturally long fingernails evoke the monstrous qualities of Nosferatu, while the classy outfit suggests the aristocratic villainy of an Edgar Allan Poe story, all coming together in a chilling performance that is now remembered alongside classic characters like Frankenstein and Norman Bates.

“What is life? It is the beginning of death.”

While Joe would become an unstoppable force of evil in the sequels and spin-offs, evolving into something of a proto-slasher villain, his first appearance was a lot less extravagant than the gothic tales that inspired it. At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul is unique in its exploitation-y thrills and overall weirdness, commenting on faith and morality while drenching itself in a decadent aesthetic. The crude technical aspects end up enhancing the film’s gritty qualities, even if this had more to do with the low budget than Mojica’s artistic intent. Even so, the film feels decades ahead of its time, marrying avante garde editing, unconventional photography and existential monologues with moments of truly visceral terror.

Casually eating meat on a Good Friday might not seem all that horrific by today’s standards, but to the deeply religious audiences of 1960s Brazil, this defiant bit of blasphemy was far more offensive than the perverse sexual imagery and horrific death scenes. In fact, the production of Joe’s debut film was only made possible by the disbanding of Brazil’s censorship board, though it would ultimately return to torment Mojica with the rise of a military dictatorship.

Thankfully, this wasn’t enough to stop Joe’s reign of terror, as a sequel was soon produced to challenge increasingly conservative audiences. This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse retcons the original film’s brutal finale in order to continue Joe’s search for a bride worthy of his evil seed. This time, however, the character was traumatized by his psychedelic near-death experience, resulting in a much more sadistic protagonist. Despite the increased violence and nudity, military censors curiously only objected to Joe’s final act of religious defiance, resulting in reshoots that implied Mojica’s monster had spontaneously converted to Christianity right before death.

Future projects would obviously undo that little detail, but it would be a while before we’d see a true finale to what we now know as the Coffin Joe trilogy. After the sequel, Mojica kept the character alive through a series of cameos and spin-offs, resulting in experimental projects like The Bloody Exorcism of Coffin Joe, where Mojica himself is tormented by his creation (preceding Wes Craven’s New Nightmare by 20 years!), and a TV show where Joe became a bona fide horror host, presenting scary movies to a brand new audience.

Yes, those are real spiders!

In 2008, Mojica gave us a proper conclusion to the trilogy with Embodiment of Evil, a much darker and crueler picture that still celebrates the filmmaker’s B-movie stylings. While the sillier elements aren’t quite as endearing in high-definition as they were in the cheap black-&-white film stock of his earlier projects, Embodiment is still a triumph, offering biting social commentary while also allowing Joe one last gorey romp. Featuring numerous references to Brazil’s sordid military history, Mojica’s final film was also his most personal, with Joe’s predatory nature being overshadowed by São Paulo’s authoritarian military police force.

It’s no surprise that Mojica tapped into a well of typically Brazilian fears and anxieties when crafting these morbid fables, but many local critics originally rejected his schlocky style. Fortunately, Mojica’s work reached a much larger audience once his films found success in international festivals. Soon after the global release of the first film, Coffin Joe enthusiasts spread across the globe, with Mojica receiving awards from all over Europe and North America.

Over time, many have compared Mojica to other famous filmmakers, with some claiming that he’s the Brazilian equivalent to John Waters while others liken him to an edgier Ed Wood. Some of these comparisons are fair, but many fans confuse Mojica’s affinity for unorthodox stories and campy theatricality with a genuine lack of talent, which simply isn’t true. The more exaggerated bits of his movies always feel intentional, and the goofy nature of some scenes actually enhance the inevitable moments of terror.

It takes real passion to produce something as shocking as the Coffin Joe films in a country with a long history of punishing dissenting artists, so Mojica’s refusal to compromise his vision in spite of constant backlash remains downright inspiring. Even up to his last feature, most of Mojica’s productions seem to exist in a hellish hyper-reality where terrible things can happen to innocent people and characters communicate through (obviously-dubbed) villainous monologues.

“If you end up in hell, give my address to the devil.”

Of course, crafting deeply sacrilegious works of art comes at a cost, and some colleagues tell crazy stories about Mojica’s unusual approach to directing. The filmmaker allegedly threatened his original crew with a gun in order to ensure their cooperation when lighting a particularly difficult scene, and some even claim that he would stay in character for far too long, scaring folks on set. Mojica’s questionable treatment of female characters was also a bit much even back in the day, though many critics now argue that the director intended to expose violence against women, not glorify it.

It’s not my place to condone or condemn these unfortunate incidents, but this was clearly another time and space, and Mojica’s dedication to his craft obviously paid off in the end. His efficient camerawork, brisk pacing and penchant for controversial subject matter may not be for everyone, but there’s no denying the impact he had on several generations of filmmakers and horror fans.

These days, Coffin Joe exists in the Brazilian public consciousness as a bogeyman from a bygone age, but he’s far from forgotten. Over the years, his likeness has shown up in bizarre merchandising (I actually tried some official Coffin Joe Cachaça, poured from a bottle signed by the man himself), and local filmmakers still celebrate his priceless contributions to national cinema. Mojica’s daughter is also hard at work preserving her father’s legacy, following in his footsteps with her own villainous persona as Liz Vamp. Outside Brazil, Mojica boasts a fanbase featuring giants like Tim Burton, with frequent re-releases and preservation efforts making it much easier to get a hold of his films in international markets than in his homeland.

Ultimately, Coffin Joe is much more than “Brazil’s Freddy Krueger”, representing a filmmaker’s sincere desire to express himself while also holding up a sinister mirror to a hypocritical society. José Mojica Marins may have set out to make a simple scary movie, but he ultimately became the living embodiment of everything a scary movie can and should be. Even as horror evolves and new limits are broken, Mojica’s particular brand of profanity will live on, and I think that’s an appropriate send-off for a character obsessed with preserving his legacy.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading