Connect with us

Editorials

5 Horror Films That Totally Botched an Awesome Premise!

Published

on

A Nightmare on Elm Street Premise

If you’re a regular reader of my posts, you know that I’m not one to bash a film unless I really, really hated it. Even in films I don’t like, I’ll try to find the positive in them. Hell, I even defend plenty of films that many people don’t think are defendable. All of that being said, there are some films that simply infuriate me. These are films that take an interesting premise (or maybe a twist on a familiar one) and totally botch it. They may not be the worst quality films (though a couple are), but sometimes a disappointing film is worse than just being outright terrible. You probably have a few of these yourself. Here are mine!

It’s the Plants! – The Happening

Remember when the trailer for The Happening was released, and everyone forgot Lady in the Water for a moment? It was fairly great marketing that didn’t reveal too much about the plot, which is a rarity nowadays. Unfortunately, it turned out that 20th Century Fox knew they couldn’t do that because it was so silly. People are killing themselves because of plants! While the suicide scenes are executed well, nothing else about the movie is. From Wahlberg’s laughable performance to the scene where the characters try to outrun the wind, the film is a failure on every level. You can’t say the premise, about a wave of mass suicides taking over the country, isn’t intriguing though!

A Split Personality – High Tension

Alright, maybe this is too obvious of a choice, and I really do like most of High Tension! I just can’t stand that ending. The premise of a woman with dissociative identity disorder killing everyone around the woman she is in love with is compelling. If only Aja hadn’t tried to make it a twist in a film whose plot, as Roger Ebert put it “has a hole that is not only large enough to drive a truck through, but in fact does have a truck driven right through it.” I’m able to suspend quite a bit of disbelief, but High Tension was too much.

High Tension Premise

No More Found Footage? – [REC] 3: Genesis

Truth be told, I actually don’t hate [REC] 3 as a movie, but I do hate it as a part of the [REC]franchise. After the superb [REC] 2, directors Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza split up to each direct the third and fourth entries in the franchise. Plaza took over for [REC] 3, which tells a story parallel to the timeline of the first film. While the film starts out in the series’ trademark found footage filming style, it quickly abandons it in a sly wink to the audience when a character asks the cameraman why he is still filming during a zombie attack. It’s a nice bit of meta humor in a film and it would have been find had the humor stopped there. Unfortunately [REC] 3 becomes a horror comedy, and barely feels like a part of the series that birthed it.

REC 3 Genesis

It Was All In the Mind – The Human Centipede 2

The Human Centipede did little with it’s gross-out premise, and it turned out to be a one-trick pony. The sequel didn’t fare much better, and to add insult to injury it pulls the “it was all a dream” twist on the audience. Again, the meta premise, about a man obsessed with Tom Six’s first film who decides to make his own, is quite intriguing, but it becomes botched in an asinine twist that makes the whole movie feel like a waste of time.

Human Centipede 2

An Innocent Child Molester? – A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

It sounded like a great idea on paper. What if Freddy Krueger was actually innocent? What if his revenge spree started because he was burned alive an innocent man? It’s a fairly interesting, albeit drastically different, take on our favorite nightmare bogeyman. Unfortunately, the film decides to puss out and say “Just kidding!” Turns out there was nothing about this remake sets it apart from the original at all. It is just a hollow imitation of Wes Craven’s masterpiece. There wasn’t even a decent dream sequence (or kill) in the whole movie! Wasted potential, if you ask me.

What are some films that you thought had a lot of potential that disappointed you? Let me know in the comments below or shoot me a Tweet!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading