Connect with us

Editorials

5 Horror Films with VHS Cover Art Way Cooler Than the Actual Movie

Published

on

In the prime days of video rental stores, films could live or die by their cover box art. Particularly movies that were direct-to-video, with more limited means of promotion. Cue the eye-catching cover box to entice viewers. Sometimes this meant passing up great movies when perusing the rental shelves, because the cover box art wasn’t that impressive (I’m looking at you, weird monster poodle on the cover of The Boneyard). Other times, though, distributors went the extra mile to get attention. From 3D lenticular art, light up boxes, unique shaped boxes, and even covers that bled, it the gimmicks were guaranteed to pique curiosity. Often, though, the gimmicks were a trap and the film within would usually lead to disappointment. Here are 5 horror movies where the VHS cover box art turned out to be way cooler than the movie itself:


Breeders

A really gnarly looking monster on the cover of a horror movie was a quick way to entice viewers. Throw in a raised 3D texture and you’ve set yourself apart from the rest. Such was the case with Breeders, a late ‘90s release that is nowhere as fun as the cover would lead you to believe. The movie does live up to its name; an alien lands on Earth with the aim of destroying humanity and procreating with college girls. It’s campy bad and not in a good way.


King Kong (Colorized Edition)

Let’s get one thing straight; 1933’s King Kong is a great movie and a classic for a reason. So, the 60th anniversary release in the ‘80s with a large VHS cover box that roared when you pressed King Kong’s chest sounds like a really cool collector’s item right? Except, it included the controversial colorized version of the film. It makes sense, you have to sell the colorized version that no one wants somehow, right?


Metamorphosis

Raise your hand if you ever rented this movie based on the cool 3D cover box that featured a light-up function on the character’s eyes and sound effects? If only the movie itself was as exciting as the packaging. Borrowing heavily from David Cronenberg’s The Fly, this George Eastman (Anthropophagus) film follows a geneticist working to stop aging and decides to test his serum on himself when his university threatens to pull funding. True to the film’s title, the serum sets off a transformation from human into monster. It just takes forever to get to the actual metamorphosis and is heavy on the dialogue.


Demon Wind

The lenticular 3D art on this cover box features a demon smashing through a window. The actual film, however, is more low key and pretty much a rip off of The Evil Dead. It also never quite lives up to the monster promised on the cover. Following a group of friends that accompanies Cory to his family farm so he can investigate the death of his grandparents, they’re quickly inundated with possessed demons and not much in the way of plot of explanation. It’s cheesy fun, but the tagline “it’ll blow you away,” doesn’t quite live up to its promise.


Bleeders

This VHS cover art featured creatures from the film and a clear plastic sleeve that housed red fluid to emulate blood. It was a cool enough cover and gimmick, but it was even more unique in that Bleeders was a direct-to-video release in 1997, long after the VHS craze had died down and DVD was on the rise. The film itself couldn’t manage to live up to the cover, though, despite being based on H.P. Lovecraft’s The Lurking Fear. The plot even sounds entertaining, in which a man travels with his wife to a remote island in search of long lost relatives, only to discover a clan of incestuous flesh-eating creatures and his bizarre ancestral ties. It’s a strange enough plot to make any low budget film interesting, right? Sadly, no. Bleeders is far slower paced and more tedious than the plot implies.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading