Connect with us

Editorials

“Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction” Offered a Unique Anthology With Viewer Participation [TV Terrors]

Published

on

Horror and science fiction have always been a part of the television canvas, and constant attempts have been made over the years to produce classic entertainment. Some have fallen by the wayside, while others became mainstream phenomena. With “TV Terrors,” we take a look back at the many genre efforts from the 80’s, 90’s, and 00’s, exploring some shows that became cult classics, and others that sank in to obscurity.

This month we enter a world of truth and deception with “Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction.”

  • Aired from 1997 – 2002
  • Aired on FOX Network

“Tonight your challenge is to separate what is true from what is false. Five stories, some real, some fake. Can you judge which are fact and which are fiction? To find out, you must enter a world of both truth and deception, a world that is beyond belief.”

With the end of “Tales from the Crypt” in 1996 came the death of the anthology television show for a long while. FOX, however, took some stabs at re-inventing the formula with their introduction of the mystery anthology show “Beyond Belief” in 1997. Rather than offering fictional segments every week, this new series offered a gimmick that was so much fun and actually allowed audiences to participate. 

Every week the host of the show, Jonathan Frakes (of “Star Trek: The Next Generation” fame), would introduce five filmed segments that featured stories and situations often too incredible to be true. Often times, the segments involved short stories about karma, revenge, murder, hauntings, fate, extraordinary coincidences, and miracles. Frakes would then ask the audience if the story we’d just seen was Fact (based on a true event, often), or Fiction (by some damn good writers). At the end of every episode, Frakes would run down the list of segments and let us know which of the segments we’d just seen were fabricated, and which were based on fact. 

Often we were completely stunned, and left to our devices to discuss what we’d just learned. In a time before the internet became commonplace in our lives, it was especially maddening that we couldn’t go online and discuss the show with other fans and speculate. That was part of the fun, though, as it inspired us to play the skeptic, while also reveling in how weird and spectacular the world and reality could be. The results were frequently quite surprising, while other times the keen audience member could figure out which stories were completely bogus. 

As you might guess, FOX aired the series in the middle of the summer on Friday nights when almost no one would be home to watch. I watched it every single week and anxiously awaited its return every year. FOX would air the series every summer, and then after a whole year bring it back again the next summer for only a few months with unannounced premieres and finales. Even still, the series garnered a cult following that kept the struggling show on the air in spite of FOX’s best efforts to bury it in ratings hell. And why wouldn’t it garner an audience? “Beyond Belief” was a mixture of clever and scary, with segments that really hit home, whether they were based on fact or not. 

Sometimes the segments were pretty scary and other times the stories were just flat out heartbreaking. In one segment, a young girl is stuck in a cave under her house after a huge earthquake and is kept alive by the soothing voice of her dead grandfather, only for us to discover it was the family’s parrot mimicking him. Another segment involved a divorced couple re-uniting after years apart thanks to a mysterious DJ playing a song they both loved, only to find out neither of them made the song request. There’s the segment of a blind man’s dog that howls every time someone is about to die, and the tale of a family haunted by spooky glowing red eyes in their house. There’s also the segment of an abusive husband who is mysteriously strangled to death by, what witnesses insist to authorities, was an actual giant.

“Beyond Belief” had an addictive quality to it, especially if you loved mysteries and stories about fantastic tales from around the world. My favorite segment of the series involves a naive old woman whose troubled grandson is in constant trouble with local gangs. Due to the fact she lives in a crime infested neighborhood, he hires a mysterious locksmith to install a secure lock on the front door. He ensures her that it’ll keep only “bad people” out and is virtually impenetrable. Much to the old ladies’ surprise, her overly trusting heart is saved when the door lock won’t open for anyone that is intent on breaking in and or threatening her life. Lo and behold, it only opens for people she can trust. The ending offers a memorable twist that is great and kind of sad.

While original host James Brolin was fine, once Jonathan Frakes came aboard, the show really hit its stride. Frakes, with his theatrical presence and ability to build suspense, was a great addition to the series (the really creepy announcing from Don LaFontaine didn’t hurt, either). “Beyond Belief” was often a mix of Rod Serling’s “Night Gallery,” “Alfred Hitchcock Presents,” and “Unsolved Mysteries,” where the host would introduce an element to the audience that was in some way connected to the stories in the episode. Frakes would often introduce an illusion for the audience, and discuss how the night’s stories would be about seeing more than meets the eye. 

Thankfully “Beyond Belief” managed to air on FOX for four seasons from 1997 to 2002, before it was finally cancelled. It managed to flourish in syndication on cable television for years after on various channels like Syfy, and the now defunct Chiller, and has built a rather devoted fan base. “Beyond Belief” is a series that warrants a re-introduction, especially in a time where anthology horror has gained a huge resurgence. That’s a Fact.

Is It On DVD/Blu-ray? Personally, I wouldn’t mind a decent Blu-ray release somewhere down the road, as it’s still as addictive as ever, but on the bright side, the series is available in full on Amazon Prime Video, while most episodes can also be seen uncut on YouTube.

Felix is a horror, pop culture, and comic book fanatic based in The Bronx. Along with being a self published author, he also operates his blog Cinema Crazed and loves 90's nostalgia. His number one bucket list item is to visit Ireland on Halloween. Or to marry Victoria Justice. Currently undecided.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading