Connect with us

Editorials

[Original] Why The Revolver Golden Gods Awards Show Isn’t Helping Metal

Published

on

On April 11th, the Revolver Golden Gods took place, giving praise and recognition to the rock and metal community. Famous musicians, such as Dee Snider, Chris Jericho, Gene Simmons, Marilyn Manson, Slash, Amy Lee, and many more, were in attendance. It was a night meant to not only celebrate the achievements of rock and metal musicians and their offerings, but it was also a night for the fans, a way to honor their passion and their love. And it was a night that did absolutely nothing to spread the word and the importance of rock and metal.

You see, there are tailored award shows quite often that are specifically meant for the fans of a specific genre. Just look at the CMTs, the BET Awards, the Spike Video Game Awards, etc… These are award shows aimed at a specific audiences because of a perceived lack of recognition in the mainstream. “People just don’t understand country!” Have the CMTs. “People think rap and hip hop is all about drugs, money, and gangs.” Have the BET Awards. “People think heavy metal is only about worshipping the devil and doesn’t have any melody!” Have the Revolver Golden Gods and the Metal Hammer awards shows.

See, what it boils down to is that these award shows are for niche markets only. People who are not into hip hop are not going to tune into the BET Awards. Know why? Because there isn’t a reason to tune in. I can safely say that I’ve never seen a BET or CMT Awards show. But my not seeing these award shows is not because of a disdain or hatred towards hip hop or country. It’s because these award shows don’t offer anything new.

I’m not against hip hop or country. As a matter of fact, I truly appreciate the history of both genres and think that there are astonishing artists in each category. I’ll happily listen to some Aesop Rock, Immortal Technique, and KRS One just as quickly as I’ll tune into some Johnny Cash, Hank Williams, and Earl Scruggs.

But these award shows only pay attention to already established artists who have broken into the mainstream with huge success and neglect mentioning the artists who are struggling and fighting to make it to some state of recognition. Look at the winners of many of the Revolver Golden Gods Awards: Black Veil Brides, Kiss, Rush, Five Finger Death Punch, Slash, Slipknot, Avenged Sevenfold, Korn, etc… The only artist that got recognition that isn’t very well known over here in the States is X-Japan, who happen to be pretty damn huge in Japan and other parts of the world.

Look, I realize that for ever artist that makes it big there are at least 1,000 that are screaming for a tenth of that attention. Hell, a hundredth! All I’m asking for is a few categories that recognize how artists are utilizing new social media platforms in unique and interesting ways, such as a “Best Soundcloud Artist” entry. Perhaps “Best Independently Released Album”?

I’d also love to see categories that represent genres that aren’t as widely recognized, such as “Best Progressive Rock/Metal Artist”, “Heaviest Artist Of The Year” (if Meshuggah puts out an album that year, they automatically win, FYI), “Most Inventive Artist” (this could be usage of new instrumentation, clever use of studio production, etc…), and so on. Hopefully you see my point here. This is an opportunity for artists that wouldn’t normally get a wink and nod to get that bit of attention.

Or what about recognizing artists from countries that people wouldn’t expect to hear from? India is currently exporting a great deal of astounding metal that I’m sure few of you have heard. But that’s not your fault nor should you feel like you are supposed to know these things. After all, how can you? The Internet is such a massive place now that the very concept of finding anything without knowing where exactly to begin is beyond daunting. It’s actually quite terrifying.

What I’m trying to say is that these niche award ceremonies are in a position of power. They are able to not only appease their core audience, they can educate them at the same time. They can be seen as an event to learn about new, upcoming, or interesting artists that would normally pass under the consumers radars. Why not let some of the hosts and special guests talk about the music that they are listening to and what they feel is going to be the future of the genre?

I also want to take a moment here to say that I can probably easily be seen as a hypocrite by writing this article and yet posting news stories about Korn, Staind, and a multitude of other artists that don’t need any more recognition. And you’d be right, I definitely do that.

But do me a favor and dig around a little bit. Remember when I was on a kick posting stories about TesseracT? They were, at the time, basically unknown to mainstream listeners but I couldn’t get enough of them. And my posting stories about them worked! Several times I received emails and tweets from readers who wanted to thank me for turning them onto the band.

Or what about my Best Albums of 2011, Leprous and White Willow? I guarantee you that they have nowhere near the recognition of a vast majority of the bands I post about. But I listened to them, fell in love and I wanted to share that love with you, because I believe that you would enjoy them as well.

Yes, I’m going to post about the big name bands a great deal. But know that when I post about bands you haven’t heard of, it’s because I think there is something special going on and I hope that you trust me and give them a shot. No, you may not agree with every choice I make. But all it takes is for you to hear that one band that takes your breath away for me to feel like I’ve succeeded. THAT is what I want the Revolver Golden Gods Awards to do for me.

Got any thoughts/questions/concerns for Jonny B.? Shoot him a message on Twitter!

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading