Connect with us

Images

Here’s Chris Hemsworth In ‘Ghostbusters,’ New Images!

GHOSTBUSTERS | Image courtesy of Sony Pictures
Images courtesy of Sony Pictures

They ain’t afraid of no ghost.

Ghostbustersnews.com released a series of new character shots from Paul Feig’s modern Ghostbusters, which display the brand new ghost-busting crew that includes Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon, and Leslie Jones, as well as Chris Hemsworth – thus completely flipping the role reversal from the 1984 original.

“Dead criminals from all eras of New York’s under­belly past have returned to roost among the living,” EW recently stated revealing more of the plot. “Pilgrims, old-­timey sailors, Revolutionary War spirits, and even a couple of zoot­-suited gangsters are ready to take on four formidable female busters looking to rid the city of its phantasmic filth.”

Feig has filmed cameos (in new roles) for many of the original Ghostbusters cast, including Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Annie Potts, and even Sigourney Weaver.

Andy Garcia, Michael Kenneth Williams, Matt Walsh and Pat Kiernan also star alongside Chris Hemsworth in Ghostbusters blasting into theaters July 15, 2016.

[Related Post] Ghostbusters: Slimer to Make an Appearance?!

“SNL” vet Neil Casey is the main Ghostbusters villain. He is rumored to play the ghost of a murderer (sort of like Wes Craven’s Shocker, actually) who resurrects a ghost army based on historical characters.

The full plot details were previously revealed here.

GHOSTBUSTERS | Image courtesy of Sony Pictures

GHOSTBUSTERS | Image courtesy of Sony Pictures

GHOSTBUSTERS | Image courtesy of Sony Pictures

GHOSTBUSTERS | Image courtesy of Sony Pictures

GHOSTBUSTERS | Image courtesy of Sony Pictures



COMMENTS

97 Comments
  • Oby83

    whats his name? Danny Potts?

    • Calum Sanderson

      Annie Potts was the actor…not the character.

      • Oby83

        lol yeah i know but i decided to go with that name 😛

    • Justin McGill

      Jamesy Milnitz-Tulley.. c’mon.. you know that would be some FUNNY $)**%.

    • Steve Wasko

      Personally, I find that pretty funny.

      I’m curious how they explain the new all female Ghostbusters. I think a good transition would be that the originals got so successful that started selling Ghostbuster franchise. That could expand out the concept. Plus, it would be kind of funny treating like a opening a Dunkin’ Donuts.

      • Nem

        The whole franchising thing was what they were discussing a lot in the first film. It is perfect to say that this new group was one of those franchises. Even in NYC it is big enough to need multiple ghostbusters. So yeah not caring it is all female, gender doesn’t bother me. I just hope they say it is another part of the franchise instead of saying complete reboot.

  • REC03

    i hope this movie makes a billion dollars just to piss off the misogynists who want it to fail.

    • Exactly what I’ve been thinking. I would’ve loved another one with the originals but if this one has the heart of that going for it then I’m all for it.

      • REC03

        thank you. i mean i love the original but even if this sucks it won’t change the fact that the original is iconic. all i have been reading is how awful it is that the cast is all female (even though the original is all male but thats ok) and Melissa is a fat ass. blah blah. just disgusting.

        • I hate the “there not hot/skinny” sludge people have been posting also. None of the guys in the original where movie star attractive at all. It was about the wit & chemistry between them all, not could they all be featured on GQ.

    • Neckbeard

      MUH SOGGY KNEES!

    • PsychoMantis18

      Not all of us are misogynists, we just have discernible taste.

      • wehoaks

        You have made it clear you hate that they cast women. Thus the reason you hate this movie ALREADY is because of WOMEN. RE: you’re a misogynist.

        • Brian

          Maybe he doesnt want to look at ugly women for 2 hrs. Or ugly women who arent funny but are supposed to be funny. Thats not misogyny. Like he said, its having some taste.

          • wehoaks

            There’s nothing cuter than a misogynist explaining what is or isn’t misogyny.

          • PsychoMantis18

            Except for you, wehoaks, and all the time you have on your hands.

          • wehoaks

            Thanks for your classic douchebag response. Misogynist.

        • PsychoMantis18

          I hate this movie? I haven’t seen it yet.

          I hate this movie because of women? You seem to know the definition of misogyny, you just don’t know how to apply it.

          Silver star for effort though, wehoaks.

          • wehoaks

            Misogynist.

    • Roger The Alien

      It’s gotta be misogyny. I mean, it’s not like re-boots or re-makes of classic films ever get dissent from fans of the originals.

      • wehoaks

        The majority of people talk shit because of NO WAY BRAH WOMUHNS?! So yeah, misogyny is a pretty big factor.

        • Roger The Alien

          Ramis’ script he was working on before he died had one male and three women in the leads. So, there was always an idea of having women in crew. I have a hard time believing “a majority” of the out-cry is solely from sexist men screaming from their man-caves.

          • wehoaks

            Well when most of the negative comments on here are solely about the being women or mention them being ugly, fat, gross etc I would consider that a majority. Maybe you don’t think that way but a lot of people sure do.

          • Roger The Alien

            Personally, I don’t care that they cast women in the leads. I just want a good, entertaining movie. But so far this sounds like a bad parody like the 2014 Ninja Turtles turned out to be.

    • Brian

      I hope the movie fails for the sole reason of disappointing you

      • wehoaks

        I KNOW you can’t get laid.

      • REC03

        ok misogynist.

  • RidleyScott

    Rumor has it the two other receptionists are going to be played by Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr.

    • wehoaks

      And called “Sweet tits” and “Honey” by the ghostbusters the whole time.

  • wehoaks

    Guys with little nuts will be sooooooo rattled in 3…2…1…

    • Nathan Springstead

      *clears throat…

  • wehoaks

    PS: He’s so damn sexy.

    • pablitonizer

      No lies detected

  • Adam Clifton

    Exactly as I pictured him to look in this movie

  • Creepshow

    Old-timey sailors? That sounds utterly haunting. (shudder)
    Gilligan is so terrifying.

  • MaryMaria

    Holy hell, this man is hot! I was already looking forward to this movie, but now I’ll be first in line!

    • Chrissie-Watkins

      I agree- BD, is it too much to ask for a full body shot?

  • PsychoMantis18

    OUTRAGE!
    WHY IS THERE A HOT GUY SURROUNDED BY UGLY WOMEN!
    THE ORIGINAL HAD UGLY MEN AND AN UGLY RECEPTIONIST, THIS IS SEXIST! OUTRAGE!

    • aaaandI’mBored

      he really doesn’t look hot like that

    • the usual suspect

      I would have boned Annie Potts, she’s not ugly at all

      • Oby83

        yeah ghostbusters 2 version too 😉

        • the usual suspect

          ya definitely in that movie she was a looker.

      • PsychoMantis18

        Fair call.

  • Roger The Alien

    This looks and sounds cartoonishly bad.

  • Chrissie-Watkins

    When I saw “new imageS” i was thinking multiple shots of Chris Hemsworth. I call clickbait.

    • You probably missed that comma after “Ghostbusters”, meaning “Chris Hemsworth in Ghostbusters + new images” 😉

  • Phillip Marlowe

    Ugh, those glasses of his aren’t horn-rimmed enough to be the male counterpart for Annie Potts. I am so boycotting this movie, for that one minuscule detail that has no bearing on the rest of the film.

  • Phillip Marlowe

    Ok, legitimate question; What is the main vehicle of this new gang? Is it another Ecto-1, or could it be the fire truck on its side, in that last picture? The firetruck actually seems like a good idea, to me.

    • Oby83

      a 83/84 caddy i think

    • Satanzilla

      Hey man, I actually saw the Ecto-1 this past fall driving past the NY Public Library for some exterior shots that were being filmed. It looks a lot like the original but I believe the car that’s used is a somewhat updated model. Same idea though — hearse/ambulance type body with a lot of crap piled on top.

      • Foxenstein Must Be Destroyed

        … or as creepshow calls it “horse shit” you say tamato creepshow says horseshit. you say potato creepshow says horseshit. tomato, horseshit, potato, horseshit…. let’s call the whole thing off.

  • Jeremy Stewart

    I already hate this movie because it’s clear their characters are just riffs off the male characters from the originals. Do people really think that this should be good enough for actresses? It’s lazy and people should be finding this insulting. It’s basically Hollywood giving the finger to actresses and saying they’re not good enough to have characters of their own, so they’re just rehashing already established characters. The movie isn’t out, but I guarantee this is what’s happening.

    And I have no problem with a female fronted Ghostbuster movie, but for fuck sake, give it its own character. A cartoon series like Extreme Ghostbusters had its own character. Why can’t a Hollywood film?

    • Creepshow

      Your right! The movie ISN’T out yet. So you based your ramble on NOTHING!

      • Jeremy Stewart

        It’s really not hard to tell based on on the publicity photos that their characters are riffs on the originals. Don’t cry to me when I turn out to be right. And to even add to that, it’s obvious that Chris Hemsworth is the male equivalent to Janine.

        • Creepshow

          Nobody is gonna cry to you and your crystal ball of nonsensical, assumed horseshit.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            Just because I say something you don’t agree with doesn’t make what I said “nonsensical”. And all of my “assumptions” are based upon photos from the film and production.

            And also, you call me out for making assumptions about the movie while you are making assumptions yourself. You assume this is gonna be good. You assume this isn’t gonna just be a cash grab. Are my “assumptions” only bad because they’re negative? Are my “assumptions” only bad because you don’t agree with them? There’s no way you should be this defensive about something if haven’t already assumed it’s gonna be good.

          • Creepshow

            This is hilarious! I don’t know what your reading? Because I didn’t say jack-shit about the movie besides that it isn’t out yet.
            If this was a “Horse Shit Casino”….I just hit the jackpot.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            It’s quite clear from your tone and the fact that you bothered to respond to me at all in the first place that you have some form of care about this film and think it might be good. If you didn’t, why would you bother to respond to me in the first place?

          • Satanzilla

            He can respond to you without caring about the movie even a little. You’re ranting about a movie no one has seen yet.

          • Brian

            Isn’t this an “article” about a movie that hasn’t come out yet with a comment section? So far every production/ post production photo looks awful. The idea is awful and the only thing worse than the idea is this cast.

          • Satanzilla

            Yeah, and doesn’t the comment section allow people to comment on other peoples’ comments?

          • Foxenstein Must Be Destroyed

            no.

          • wehoaks

            That’s exactly what a misogynist would say!

          • Jeremy Stewart

            “You’re ranting about a movie no one has seen yet”
            So are a lot of people. And a lot of people as well are acting like this film is already good before it’s even come out. Yet I’m being singled out simply because what I have to say is negative.

          • Satanzilla

            No, you don’t have to care about the movie to be frustrated by people saying it’s bad when it hasn’t even been completed yet. That’s not a “I’m defending the movie” issue. Every single thing you say about it may be true. But there’s no point in complaining about something that hasn’t happened yet.

            As for “a lot of people,” well, a lot of people watched honey boo boo as well. A lot of people don’t lend legitimacy to anything.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            Why would they even be reading an article for something they didn’t care about in the first place? They had enough care to go to the comment section, acknowledge my post and respond to it. If they didn’t care, they wouldn’t have even bothered to respond to me. It’s not as though I PM’d them my opinion. I just posted my opinion in the comments of an article, and the reason why I have these opinions is because I know how Hollywood works.

            And I really don’t see why I shouldn’t be allowed to complain about a movie that hasn’t been released when there are already ranting about it going to be great. And it’s not like nothing from the movie has been released. We have a lot of publicity images.

          • Satanzilla

            You can’t be serious. Now I see why creepshow stopped bothering to respond. You really don’t realize that someone can be curious about development of a project without being an ardent fan of the project?

          • Jeremy Stewart

            You can care for something without being a fan of it. I care enough about this movie to read articles, post comments and even respond to people who respond to my comments, but am I a fan of it so far? No. If you are curious about something, you have some form of care to read about it or bother being involved with it at all. You have to be misunderstanding my way of using the word “care” because by “care” I mean interest.

          • t k

            My head hurts from this argument. These people responding to you, Jeremy, are obviously stupid and/or ignorant as they cannot seem to grasp the simple point you tried to make. Instead they fling BS insults like children and take offense to everything you say. Just ignore those trolls dude they aren’t capable of logical thought.

          • wehoaks

            You’re being singled out because you sound like a ranting moron.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            Funny you calling me an idiot when everything you say sounds like it’s coming from a 12 year old child. You respond to people with such a level of immaturity, even more so than the people who bash these film simply for having Women, that it’s hard to take anything you say seriously.

          • wehoaks

            You’re upset about pictures. Bahahahahahahahahaha.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            Actually, at this point, I’m actually upset that your parent’s are irresponsible enough to allow you to surf the computer alone. Don’t they know just how scary the internet is for a child?

          • wehoaks

            Hahaha god you are such a cliche douchebag dope. Keep ’em coming Jer. Tell us more about simple pics setting your balls on fire. Tell us how much you already hate this movie.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            You call me a douchebag, yet I’m not the one who said “I KNOW you can’t get laid.” in response to someone. Grow the fuck up.

          • wehoaks

            Someone’s taint itches!!!! Easy Jer easy. Breathe virgin, breathe. These women won’t hurt you.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            I think it’s become clear you’re the type of person who has to have the final word, so I’ll just say bye, have a good day and call your a misogynist to give you a taste of your own medicine. Bye bye now.

          • wehoaks

            Calling me a misogynist is a taste of my own medicine? OMG BUUUUUUUUUURN.

            Hey Jer, want to jerk off to pics of Melissa McCarthy together then lick each other’s holes?

          • RidleyScott

            You’re a strange concoction.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            How am I a strange concoction? They insulted out of the blue. None of this resorted to insults until they popped in. This entire thing was basically over until they revived it.

          • wehoaks

            Time to log off Jeremy.

          • Jeremy Stewart

            I’m sure they can defend themselves, but thanks.

          • wehoaks

            Jeremy?! Back to your room kiddo.

          • Foxenstein Must Be Destroyed

            isn’t the horse shit casino close to walking distance from circus circus or am i thinking of another casino?

          • Brodequin

            Niiice one. It reminds me this:
            “We apologise for the fault in the subtitles. Those responsible have been sacked.
            Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.
            The directors of the firm hired to continue the credits after the other people had been sacked, wish it to be known that they have just been sacked.”

          • Foxenstein Must Be Destroyed

            … i’ve never seen crystal clear horseshit.

          • Brodequin

            It must be something…

          • Foxenstein Must Be Destroyed

            it must be. imagine if you had a dog that shat crystal clear. walking in the backyard would be a nightmare! if you stepped in it then you’d be like “where’s that smell coming from?” not to mention wiping your ass after a crystal clear shit.how would you know when to stop wiping? … and if it got on your hands at a christmas party and had to quickly go out and rub elbows with shitty hands. total nightmare.

    • Jeremy Stewart

      I’m just gonna leave this comment here and say, at this point, none of this shit really matters. I just left this comment here just to get my feelings about this movie, as a fan of Ghostbusters and a supporter of actresses, off my chest. I have no confidence in Hollywood getting this right. To me, it just screams cash grab and laziness. I said none of this to start anything especially personal. If you don’t agree with me, that’s fine, and if Hollywood proves me wrong, that’ll be great. But this entire thing has just become ridiculous. I’m sorry to anyone I’ve insulted, to anyone who feel insulted and to anyone I’ve possibly misunderstood, and I do not mean any of these things personally. I’m just gonna drop the entire thing and move on to other things.

  • Brian Wiley

    so progressive, they still only allow 1 minority.
    How come when women benefit in Hollywood it’s primarily white women?

    • t k

      I really hope you’re being sarcastic. If not I must ask when the PC nonsense will end?

      • Darnell

        actually he has a point. There is only one minority in a cast of what is probably going to be two or three dozen people. No Asians or Hispanics? One unattractive black woman is it?

        There is all this talk of Girl Power, and an all female Ghostbuster cast yet again it’s pretty much all white people outside of one black chick.

        Doesn’t sound very diverse.

  • I don’t have a problem with a team of actresses doing a movie, but this is Ghostbusters, common! Lets take it a little more serious then this. I’m not supporting this movie in any way.

    Girl power!!!

  • Halloween_Vic

    He still looks damm hott!!!

    • Evan3

      He is, but isn’t his neck looking oddly long here?

      • Halloween_Vic

        Ahhhh could be a ghost in disguise himself.

  • Werewolf

    LOL is he gonna be the male Janine?

this week in horror

This Week in Horror - August 7, 2017

The hard copy of Friday the 13th: The Game is coming, Sarah Paulson joins M. Night Shyamalan's Glass, and Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark gets a re-release with the original art.

Posted by Bloody Disgusting on Monday, August 7, 2017
Advertisement

CURATED CONTENT

More in Images