In theaters August 17, I caught an early screening of Focus Features’ ParaNorman, the latest 3-D animated genre pic from the team behind Coraline. Carousing the Web it appears people are really digging this flick, only I wasn’t as entertained. The stop-motion flick looks absolutely astounding, but the story lacks depth, creativity and laughs.
“[It's a] remarkable piece of art that, utilizing state of the art 3-D, take stop-motion animation to an entirely new level. The eye candy that LAIKA has delivered is revolutionary and so advanced that it makes Sony’s classic Monster House look like absolute crap.
“[And while] the animation itself is stunning, what lacks is the screenplay. Butler penned the story that is gummed down with incredibly bad jokes, obnoxious characters, and a bland moral that’s worked around the classic “Frankenstein” tale.”
You can read the review in its entirety by clicking here. We’d love to know your thoughts, so write your own reviews when it hits theaters on August 17.
If Fox has proved anything with its horrid Ice Age franchise it’s that parents will take their kids to see any animated children’s movie. It only takes a studio’s unlimited checkbook to get one made, but it doesn’t take much effort to get thousands of little asses into theater seats. While every studio has their own animated division, what sets them apart is how hard they work to make a quality film; Focus Features is off to a rocky start.
Focus now has two animated features under their belt; one being last year’s Coraline, the other ParaNorman, which features the voice work of Kodi Smit-McPhee as a young boy who can see ghosts. Both films are remarkable pieces of art that, utilizing state of the art 3-D, take stop-motion animation to an entirely new level. The eye candy that LAIKA has delivered is revolutionary and so advanced that it makes Sony’s classic Monster House look like absolute crap. Point is, there’s no arguing that both Coraline and ParaNorman are beautiful films that are so colorful and mesmerizing that they can hypnotize a viewer into a trance. The problem is neither film has any substance; both are so incredibly bland that it’ll leave most adults jonesing for their cell phones. In fact, I was so bored that I walked out of a press screening of Coraline (I eventually finished it on home video). It almost happened again with ParaNorman…
ParaNorman appears to be built on the love for the genre, only it becomes increasingly obvious that the filmmakers are just using the new-found zombie popularity to sell a product. Don’t be fooled. Directed by Sam Fell (responsible for the decrepit Flushed Away) and newcomer Chris Butler, ParaNorman opens with a brilliant nod to the genre. The viewer is treated to a classic ’70s-styled animated horror movie that’s aged and treated like a period piece with a Goblin-esque score. The camera pulls out to reveal Norman watching the film with his deceased Grandma knitting in the background. We follow Norman through his day as he’s belittled and picked on my the entire town for claiming he can see dead people. Meanwhile, Norman is stalked by his uncle who believes Norman has the gift to stop a town legend, and curse, about a witch who will return to seek revenge for her murder decades ago. The curse is ignited when his uncle dies, and several corpses rise from the grave for mayhem. Norman and his motley crew fend off the creatures as they attempt to piece together the connection between the undead and the witch, who follows in the sky as a foreboding painting of doom.
As previously stated, the animation itself is stunning, but what lacks is the screenplay. Butler penned the story that is gummed down with incredibly bad jokes, obnoxious characters, and a bland moral that’s worked around the classic “Frankenstein” tale. Without any adult humor, it’s offensively tedious to watch, and it doesn’t help that all of Norman’s “friends” are terrible people (there’s the self-absorbed cheerleader, stupid jock, dumb fat kid and ugly/gross/obnoxious bully – you know, people you enjoy watching for an hour and a half). But what truly kills the movie is that it never feels like any of them are in any danger, especially because the zombies don’t hurt anyone (or anything – it would have helped tremendously if they at least ate the town’s animals or something). It’s also frustrating attempting to understand the town’s curse and why the witch would even concoct such a useless scheme. The entire plot is built around this moral pounding Butler wants to give the audience, but never wholly integrates it into the story.
In an attempt at brevity, ParaNorman is soulless art; on surface a beautiful piece of work that’s rotten at its core. This is not a movie made by horror fans, but one aimed at their pocket books. You’d be better off revisiting a classic like Tim Burton’s A Nightmare Before Christmas instead of wasting an hour and a half with this muddled mound of clay.
LMFAO I could of told you it was boring from the stills you guys showed. I hate kids movies. They used to be cool but they are now all the same cliche junk.
I stopped reading this review after you called Coraline “incredibly boring” and said you walked out of the theater. How can I take anything after that seriously?
On a separate note this site needs some serious fixing up. I typed this all out and went to a different window for a minute. When I came back everything I wrote was gone.
Seriously. Coraline is a fantastic film, so that’s a retarded comment. This is a film aimed for kids. Seems like that is forgotten.
I just saw ParaNorman. I am a HUGE fan of Coraline, I love everything about it. ParaNorman is not the same, it’s not directed by Henry Selick, and it’s not based on a Neil Gaiman story. I found the story in ParaNorman to be flat, but the animation is simply amazing.
This is a ridiculous review. This is not a horror film. It’s for kids. Get a clue.
Note to Mr. Disgusting: Don’t mention that you hated Coraline in your review of the latest Henry Selick movie; no fans will read it.
ParaNorman has nothing to do with Henry Selick.
Meh, I didn’t mind Coraline but it certainly wasn’t a masterpiece (outside of the amazing animation). Will definitely skip this
Here’s a real review. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/57658
And it’s getting a lot of positive reviews, not dumb crap like this.
A movie made for kids usually has to be paired down a little for the younger set. Unfortunately, we can’t all be as immensely sophisticated as those jaded movie critics who hate first and ask questions later. Those seeking Nightmare Before Christmas 2 will be disappointed. If that’s your yard stick then most kids movies will fall incredibly short.
ParaNorman is doleful tale, yes it’s simple but also has some whimsical, spooky moments. The real draw here is the colorful and breathtaking stop-motion animation and THAT more than makes up for the shortcomings. I don’t believe they set out to reinvent the wheel, but rather, appease the young fans of horror than will grow up loving horror. And the world needs more of them, as the tired old bitches of horror sites start dying off.
I saw Paranorman last night and it was absolutely awesome. I had fun the entire time. Thanks to this RIDICULOUS review and the overall poor technical quality of this website, this will be my last visit.
Legitimate review – http://www.dreadcentral.com/reviews/paranorman-2012