Connect with us

Editorials

In Defense Of Holiday Edition: ‘Black Christmas’ (Remake)

Published

on

Tis the season to talk about horror Christmas movies! It’s a constantly growing sub-genre with quite possibly the most, lowest rated horror movies of any subgenre. Today I want to revisit a movie that’s not only a Christmas Horror but also a remake (a remake of a widely adored horror movie no less) and well, I think it’s just great!

Black Christmas hit theaters on Christmas day 8 years ago and effectively brought Christmas horror back to audiences on a wider scale. It gets an abysmal 14% on Rotten Tomatoes so it’s pretty safe to say the remake of Black Christmas, wasn’t well received. But why? In order to enjoy this film I think you might have to remove yourself from Bob Clark’s original. Yes, the original Black Christmas is a staple of the horror genre in the 70s and for good reason, but there is still a lot of merit to the remake.

Before we get started, for those of you who somehow missed both films here’s a brief synopsis: While several sorority girls are snowed in for the evening they begin getting obscene and disturbing phone calls. The girls are terrorized and killed off one by one by the caller. Pretty simple plot and it remains roughly the same in both films.

Black-Christmas-2006-1

Now, there are some differences in the plot that may be why people tend to dislike it. In the remake, the girls are terrorized by a caller but instead of it being some maniacal stranger the caller is given a back story (a recently growing phenomenon in the remake biz). Poor little Billy Lenz was doomed from early childhood to grow up a freak, he had perpetually yellow skin and his mother hated him. After disposing of the only person who ever loved Billy, his father, Mrs. Lenz soon remarries to get the child she always wanted. To make matters even worse for Billy, his mother’s new beau isn’t living up to his role as baby maker so she turns to Billy himself. She soon gets pregnant but her happiness is short lived when Billy attacks the child and his mother, but not before preheating the oven to make special human Christmas cookies.

As I said, you may need to remove yourself from the original to really be able to enjoy this flick. It came out when I was in high school so I hadn’t yet seen the original when I first watched the remake. If it hadn’t been a remake I think this would have been a lot more successful with horror fans. For one, it is one of the few horror films that have come out in the past 15 years to hold an “R” rating. And it’s a pretty hard “R”. We are constantly swimming in a sea of “PG-13” travesties that it’s kind of nice to sit back and enjoy a blood drenched “R” rated horror movie.

Speaking of blood, I want to point out that Black Christmas really kicked up the gore for the remake. It’s a full blown slasher from the minute it starts and it doesn’t let up until the credits roll. With each kill the audience gets a bucket of blood to go along with it. Being a gore hound myself, I loved it! I understand that some fans might be thrown off because of this drastic shift in tone from the original but Billy really does bring it home for the body count.

Black Christmas head

So, yes, the tone is extremely different but it was a change that director Glen Morgan made to get asses in seats. I wish the atmospheric horror of the 70s would make a comeback but current generations just don’t seem to give as much money to those. So creative decisions had to be made and Morgan opted for a more vibrant and fast paced story.

I want to take a minute to acknowledge the leading ladies of this film. Sure, I did miss Margot Kidder and Olivia Hussey on my recent viewing of this but I think there is something to be said about the girls in this film. The cast consists of Katie Cassidy, Michelle Trachtenberg, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, and Lacey Chabert. Each of these girls brings their own spin to the “sorority girl”   persona and the result we get is a cast of girls who you actually start to like. At least I did. They aren’t your typical dumb/bitchy girls that are usually portrayed, instead they are resourceful and put up a damn good fight against their attacker. Yeah, Lacey Cahbret plays her typical Mean Girls role but even that’s entertaining.

And speaking of entertaining, this movie is just plain fun. It’s crammed full Christmas imagery to get you feeling festive and it’s got a nice grain of humor to it as well. Often in slasher movies it’s easy to get bored or distracted when someone isn’t getting gutted but in Black Christmas there is always something to amuse you. Between the incredibly creepy phone calls (just as creepy as the original even) and the banter between the girls, I was never bored.

So who else likes this holiday treat? I can’t be the only one. Give it a watch, or a re-watch, and come back and let me know what you thought!

Jess is a Northeast Ohio native who has loved all things horror and fringe since birth. She has a tendency to run at the mouth about it and decided writing was the only way not to scare everyone away. If you make a hobby into a career it becomes less creepy. Unless that hobby is collecting baby dolls. Nothing makes that less creepy.

Editorials

11 Years Later: The Horrific Cycles of Violence in ‘Only God Forgives’ Starring Ryan Gosling

Published

on

Traditionally, movie theater walkouts are usually associated with the horror genre, with infamous cases ranging from 1973’s The Exorcist (particularly during the crucifix masturbation scene) and even Lars Von Trier’s controversial serial killer memoir, The House That Jack Built.

That being said, there are exceptions to this rule, as some movies manage to terrorize audiences into leaving the theater regardless of genre. One memorable example of this is Nicolas Winding Refn’s 2013 revenge thriller Only God Forgives, a film so brutal and inaccessible that quite a few critics ended up treating it like a snuff film from hell back when it was first released. However, I’ve come to learn that horror fans have a knack for seeing beyond the blood and guts when judging the value of a story, and that’s why I’d like to make a case for Winding’s near-impenetrable experiment as an excellent horror-adjacent experience.

Refn originally came up with the idea for Only God Forgives immediately after completing 2009’s Valhalla Rising and becoming confused by feelings of anger and existential dread during his wife’s second pregnancy. It was during this time that he found himself imagining a literal fistfight with God, with this concept leading him to envision a fairy-tale western set in the far east that would deal with some of the same primal emotions present in his Viking revenge story.

It was actually Ryan Gosling who convinced the director to tackle the more commercially viable Drive first, as he wanted to cement his partnership with the filmmaker in a more traditional movie before tackling a deeply strange project. This would pay off during the production of Only God Forgives, as the filmmaking duo was forced to use their notoriety to scrounge up money at a Thai film festival when local authorities began demanding bribes in order to allow shooting to continue.

In the finished film, Gosling plays Julian, an American ex-pat running a Muay-Thai boxing club alongside his sociopathic brother Billy (Tom Burke). When Billy gets himself killed after sexually assaulting and murdering a teenager, Julian is tasked by his disturbed mother (Kristin Scott Thomas) with tracking down those responsible for the death of her first-born child. What follows is a surreal dive into the seedy underbelly of Bangkok as the cycle of revenge escalates and violence leads to even more violence.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

There’s no right or wrong way to engage with art, but there are some films that clearly require more effort from the audience side in order to be effective. And while you can’t blame cinemagoers for just wanting to enjoy some passive entertainment, I think it’s always worth trying to meet a work of art on its own terms before judging it.

Despite being a huge fan of Drive, I avoided Only God Forgives for a long time because of its poor critical reception and excessively esoteric presentation. It was only years later that I gave the flick a chance when a friend of mine described the experience as “David Lynch on cocaine.” It was then that I realized that nearly everything critics had complained about in the film are precisely what made it so interesting.

If you can stomach the deliberate pacing, you’ll likely be fascinated by this stylish nightmare about morally questionable people becoming trapped in a needless cycle of violence and retaliation. Not only is the photography impeccable, turning the rain-slicked streets of Bangkok into a neo-noir playground, but the bizarre characters and performances also help to make this an undeniably memorable movie. And while Gosling deserves praise as the unhinged Julian, I’d argue that Vithaya Pansringarm steals the show here as “The Angel of Vengeance,” even if his untranslated dialogue is likely to be unintelligible for most viewers.

However, I think the lack of subtitles ends up enhancing the mood here (even though some editions of the film ended up including them against the director’s wishes), adding to the feeling that Julian is a stranger in a strange land while also allowing viewers to project their own motivations onto some of the “antagonists.”

And while Only God Forgives is frequently accused of burying its narrative underneath a pile of artsy excess, I think the heart of the film is rather straightforward despite its obtuse presentation. I mean, the moral here is basically “revenge isn’t fun,” which I think is made clear by the horrific use of violence (though we’ll discuss that further in the next section).

To be clear, I’m still not sure whether or not I enjoyed this movie, I just know that I’m glad I watched it.


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

There are two different kinds of gore effects. One of them is meant to entertain viewers with exaggerated wounds and excessive blood as you admire the craftsmanship behind the filmmaking. The other kind is simply a tool meant to simulate what actually happens when you injure a human body. Like I mentioned before, Only God Forgives isn’t trying to be “fun,” so you can guess what kind gore is in this one…

From realistic maimings to brutal fist fights that feel more painful than thrilling, the “action” label on this flick seems downright questionable when the majority of the experience has you wincing at genuinely scary acts of grisly violence. I mean, the story begins with an unmotivated rampage through the streets of late-night Bangkok and ends with the implication of even more pointless violence, so it’s pretty clear that you’re not really meant to root for an “action hero” here.

I can’t even say that the deaths resemble those from slasher flicks because the movie never attempts to sensationalize these horrific acts, with Refn preferring to depict them as straightforward consequences of violent people going through the motions – which is somehow even scarier than if this had just been yet another hyper-violent revenge movie.

Not only that, but the characters’ overall lack of moral principles makes this story even more disturbing, with the main antagonist being the closest thing to a decent person among the main cast despite also being a brutal vigilante.

Only God Forgives doesn’t care if you like it or not (and actually takes measures to make sure that the viewing experience is often unpleasant), but if you’re willing to step up to this cinematic challenge and engage with the narrative and visuals on their own terms, I think you’ll find an unforgettable nightmare waiting for you on the other side.


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading