Connect with us

Editorials

We Watched ‘The Exorcism of Molly Hartley’ So You Don’t Have To!

Published

on

Exorcism of Molly Hartley

No one (and we mean no one) was asking for a sequel to the 2008 PG-13 horror film The Haunting of Molly Hartley, but 20th Century Fox felt like the horror genre was lacking just one more possession film, so they dug The Haunting of Molly Hartley up in order to give it this unnecessary, lazy sequel.  We know how much all of you were dying to know whatever happened to Molly Hartley, so we thought we would save you the time of having to sit through this slog of a film known as The Exorcism of Molly Hartley and just tell you!

***SPOILERS for the entire film to follow***

First off, the film completely retcons the end of the first film. If you can manage to remember any detail of that film, good for you. I watched it last night and I’ve already forgotten most of it (yes, I sat through both of these things within a 24-hour period). To recap: Molly Hartley (Haley Bennett in the first film, Sarah Lind in the sequel) was stillborn on a restroom floor, so her parents made a deal with a mysterious woman (the Devil) to bring her back to life. The catch? They would only have Molly for 18 years, and then she would belong to the Devil. Also, everyone in town seemed to be Devil worshippers, when Molly’s beau (Chace Crawford) and guidance counselor (Nina Siemaszko) were revealed to be in on the plan (it is mentioned in the sequel that she died between films, which, alright). The guidance counselor was actually revealed to be the Devil, but that fact is completely discarded in the sequel. Molly was revealed to have been completely given over to the Devil by the end of the film, which was the sole moment of inspiration in an otherwise lackluster film.

Rather than explore a life where Molly is now an apostle of Satan, The Exorcism of Molly Hartley chooses to be yet another generic possession film, filled with tropes we have seen countless times before, ever since The Exorcist came out nearly 50 years ago. Six years have passed since the first film ended, and Molly is now a partner at the financial firm she works at. Little does she know that it is about to be six years, six days and six hours since her 18th birthday, which means that the Devil, whom she was impregnated with at that time (wait, what? That wasn’t discussed in the first film!) is ready to be born. I swear I’m not making this up

After celebrating her new partnership at work, Molly takes a couple home for a threesome, providing plenty of female T&A, but cuts away the second the man removes his pants. Needless to say, those two people end up dead in Molly’s bathtub full of blood. The police show up the next morning for a noise complaint that was reported the night before and then proceed to search Molly’s house without a warrant. That’s some great police work. When they find the corpses, they send Molly to a Catholic mental institution (the film just skips over her trial).

Molly Hartley

The lucky ones die in the first act.

Conveniently, at this same institution is Father Barrow (Devon Sawa, looking particularly embarrassed to be here), who was placed there after an exorcism gone wrong led to the deaths of another priest and a young woman. To be clear, Barrow pled insanity to be put in the institution over actual prison, yet when Molly starts displaying signs of possession, her therapist (Gina Holden, of Saw 3D and the very underrated Harper’s Island) thinks it’s alright to have Barrow, a man who is certifiably insane, perform an exorcism on her.

What follows are your usually possession movie tropes: Molly vomits green liquidwrithes around a lot, hangs upside down like an inverted crucifix, makes the receptionist commit suicide in an act of devotion to satan, talks in a man’s voice, flaps her tongue, shoots bugs out of her mouth, and spells words on her skin. There is no originality to any of it, and the lack of shame present in the film is insulting.

The dialogue is even worse than you would imagine, but the most egregious example of the film ripping off another film’s dialogue is when a possessed Molly tells Father Barrow that there is “No Molly, only us” (the dubbing of the demon voice over Lind’s mouth is extremely poor). There’s also a laugh-out-loud moment in the opening scene where a demon tells Barrow that he “will always be a fool for the flesh.” It’s supposed to be scary, but it all comes across as laughable.

Green Vomit

Look familiar?

After what seems like an insanely long amount of time, Molly is supposedly exorcised and put back in the hospital, while Barrow is just let free (despite his previous sentencing to the institution). It’s at about this point in the film that you realize there are still 30 minutes left in its runtime. “Dear God,” you ask. “There’s more?” Oh yes, it goes on and on.

To make a long story short (too late), Molly gets kidnapped by the Chaplain of the institution (Peter MacNeill), who is revealed to be a follower of Satan. During the ritual, the therapist appears (literally out of nowhere) and impales him with a pipe, and uses his body as a human shield against his disciples. Then a bunch of bugs fly around and the evil disappears.

Lest you thought this was the end of the film, The Exorcism of Molly Hartley puts a sequel tease in it’s final frame (maybe to be released in another seven years). A Devil bug manages to escape the room where Molly was rescued from, fly to a school bus and crawl into the ear of an unsuspecting female student.

What is most depressing about the existence of The Exorcism of Molly Hartley is that people are going to confuse this with the infinitely better The Exorcism of Emily Rose. We must all stop this from happening, and now your curiosity has been indulged you can move on with your lives. Please don’t watch this festering turd of a film and certainly don’t give it any money. Maybe this will show studios that we want better possession movies. One can dream, can’t one?

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading