Connect with us

Movies

[Review] Informative and Disturbing, ‘Rats’ Is the Ideal Horror Documentary!

Published

on

While some may scoff at the idea of horror documentaries, they’ve actually been around for quite some time now. Eerie films like Barbara Brancaccio and Joshua Zeman’s Cropsey and Frederick Wiseman’s infamous Titicut Follies have proven that reality can be just as, if not more, horrifying than fiction if viewed through the right lens. Inspired by Robert Sullivan’s eponymous book, Morgan Spurlock’s Rats documents a disturbing but oft-overlooked aspect of human life. In this case, our coexistence with another particularly successful form of mammalian life.

Rats spares no expense as it delves into the gruesome details of our muddled relationship with these creatures in a way that traditional horror movies have yet to accomplish. From the opening scenes featuring rodent dissections and the horrors that lurk within their sickly bodies, it’s quite clear that this is by no means a “popcorn movie”. However, disgusting as the subject matter may be, the film is still strangely compelling as it reveals the peculiar ways in which vermin affect our lives, and vice versa.

Through interviews with veteran exterminators and guided tours of New York City’s rat-infested hot spots, the film presents us with a possibility much more disturbing than any rodent-borne plague: that human beings are not as dominant in this world as we like to think we are. Of course, Spurlock does his best to present both sides of the issue, as the film does eventually take a break from the nausea-inducing effects of our furry neighbors on society and instead shows us the controversial ways that humanity treats our fellow mammals.

This results in a pleasantly engrossing experience, almost contradicting the aforementioned stomach-churning visuals. Nevertheless, there is a strange sense of ironic beauty in the way we see rats scurrying around polluted man-made streets as if they were their own, sharing not only our public spaces but our food and homes as well. You can’t help but admire the tenacity of these tiny creatures, despite the horrific implications of their presence. This parallel between humankind and rats is one of the film’s strongest points, as it makes us recoil in fear when confronted with the many diseases carried by these animals, but also shudder in disgust when human beings prepare them as arguably inhumane delicacies in developing countries.

Rats is certainly much more visceral than the director’s previous work (like Supersize Me and Mansome), but Spurlock maintains his tradition of not shying away from the truth, no matter how repulsive it may be. Some might argue that his use of nasty visuals is exploitive and gratuitous, but in this case, these scenes fit perfectly with the subject matter. If anything, the revolting elements of the film kept things from getting boring, even during a few lengthy bits of exposition. In any case, Rats is a simultaneously informative and terrifying look at a worldwide issue that does for rodents what It did to clowns. I’d just recommend not eating while you watch it.

Rats will premiere on the Discovery Channel on October, 22!

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Movies

’28 Years Later’ – Ralph Fiennes, Jodie Comer, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson Join Long Awaited Sequel

Published

on

28 Days Later, Ralph Fiennes in the Menu
Pictured: Ralph Fiennes in 'The Menu'

Danny Boyle and Alex Garland (AnnihilationMen), the director and writer behind 2002’s hit horror film 28 Days Later, are reteaming for the long-awaited sequel, 28 Years Later. THR reports that the sequel has cast Jodie Comer (Alone in the Dark, “Killing Eve”), Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Kraven the Hunter), and Ralph Fiennes (The Menu).

The plan is for Garland to write 28 Years Later and Boyle to direct, with Garland also planning on writing at least one more sequel to the franchise – director Nia DaCosta is currently in talks to helm the second installment.

No word on plot details as of this time, or who Comer, Taylor-Johnson, and Fiennes may play.

28 Days Later received a follow up in 2007 with 28 Weeks Later, which was executive produced by Boyle and Garland but directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. Now, the pair hope to launch a new trilogy with 28 Years Later. The plan is for Garland to write all three entries, with Boyle helming the first installment.

Boyle and Garland will also produce alongside original producer Andrew Macdonald and Peter Rice, the former head of Fox Searchlight Pictures, the division of one-time studio Twentieth Century Fox that originally backed the British-made movie and its sequel.

The original film starred Cillian Murphy “as a man who wakes up from a coma after a bicycle accident to find England now a desolate, post-apocalyptic collapse, thanks to a virus that turned its victims into raging killers. The man then navigates the landscape, meeting a survivor played by Naomie Harris and a maniacal army major, played by Christopher Eccleston.”

Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer) is on board as executive producer, though the actor isn’t set to appear in the film…yet.

Talks of a third installment in the franchise have been coming and going for the last several years now – at one point, it was going to be titled 28 Months Later – but it looks like this one is finally getting off the ground here in 2024 thanks to this casting news. Stay tuned for more updates soon!

Continue Reading