Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘Friday the 13th’ Matriarch Mrs. Voorhees Walked So ‘Scream 2’ Mom Mrs. Loomis Could Run

Published

on

Mrs. Voorhees vs Mrs Loomis

The Scream and Friday the 13th franchises have always been intrinsically connected. Not only are they foundational to the two major wings of the House of Slasher, but Scream directly references Sean S. Cunningham’s 1980 film in its opening act. Younger viewers, myself included, learned about the movie’s shocking killer reveal when Casey Becker (Drew Barrymore) loses a horror movie trivia game to the killer known as Ghostface. But rather than disappointment, many of us felt compelled to seek out this classic slasher and behold Jason’s mother for ourselves. The following year, Scream 2 would give us one of the franchise’s favorite Ghostface marauders directly inspired by this murderous mom.

Cunningham’s film is often dismissed as a copycat of John Carpenter’s iconic Halloween, but the summer camp horror is much more than a carbon copy. Admittedly reverse-engineered to highlight a calendar date — thus ensuring annual rewatches — Friday the 13th clarifies a burgeoning slasher formula while evolving the field of special effects. The story does follow then-emerging guidelines, later codified in Carol J. Clover’s 1992 treatise Men, Women, and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. A group of sexy coeds gathers at a terrible place only to find themselves picked off one by one by a killer wielding a phallic weapon.

But Friday the 13th makes one major deviation: the mysterious killer is not a hulking madman in a mask, but a grieving woman trying to process her rage.

On a dark and stormy summer night, Alice (Adrienne King) finds the dead bodies of her fellow counselors artfully staged all over the camp. As she stumbles, sobbing, out into the rain, she bumps into a friendly woman. Mrs. Voorhees (Betsy Palmer) calms her fears and assures Alice that she is “an old friend of the Christys’” who own the camp. But as they go back to call for help, Alice sees a darker side to this grinning stranger. Mrs. Voorhees recalls her own son’s time at camp, including the day he drowned in the lake. “The counselors weren’t paying any attention… They were making love while that young boy drowned.” We realize that not only has she slaughtered all of Alice’s friends, but she’s also responsible for the two gruesome murders that open the film. The grief-stricken mother channels the voice of her child, chanting, “Kill her, Mommy! Kill her!” words that weave themselves through the film’s eerie score.

Mrs. Voorhees remains an anomaly in the slasher realm, though her galvanizing voice would go on to define the franchise. Subsequent chapters follow her resurrected son, Jason, who grows up to be a hulking madman, dispatching victims with his trusty machete. A classically trained actress known for prominent work on stage and screen, Palmer faced heavy criticism for her role in what was then considered a controversial subgenre. She was particularly lambasted by critic Gene Siskel, who took the egregious step of including the name of her hometown in his review and encouraging his readers to send her hate mail. Now this pearl-clutching seems fairly quaint. It’s rooted in the misconception that older women should be maternal figures and nothing more, which erases female humanity. After all, if male characters can go berserk and slash through hordes of camp counselors, shouldn’t that arc be available to women as well?

Developed as a follow-up to the surprise success of Wes Craven’s 1996 film, Scream 2 follows final girl Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) to the campus of Windsor College, where she’s once again stalked by a costumed killer. Like both franchises’ opening entries, the story plays out like a horrific whodunit as Sidney and fellow survivors Gale (Courteney Cox) and Dewey (David Arquette) try to identify the killer on the other end of the line. In a spectacular final showdown, we learn that this time Ghostface is actually Mickey (Timothy Olyphant), the “freaky Tarantino film student.” But true to form, Craven has a second killer hiding under the mask. Gale and Sidney find themselves held at gunpoint by Debbie Salt (Laurie Metcalf), who’s been masquerading as a local reporter.

We first meet the wide-eyed woman as she shamelessly flatters Gale and desperately tries to scoop her competition. But Sidney, a Woodsboro native, finally recognizes the woman from her painful past. We find out that Debbie Salt is actually Mrs. Loomis, mother of Sidney’s dead boyfriend Billy (Skeet Ulrich), who was also the first Ghostface killer. When Sidney shoots her baby boy — an understandable act of self-defense — she ignites a mother’s insatiable rage. Mrs. Loomis has spent extensive time grooming and bankrolling the gullible Mickey to conceal her ultimate quest for revenge.

In the first film’s shocking conclusion, Billy and his partner Stu (Matthew Lillard) claim that the real-life “movie” they are making is scarier if it has no motive. But closing in on his final victim, Billy reveals the true source of his pain. He whispers to Sidney, “Your slut mother was fucking my father, and she’s the reason my mom moved out and abandoned me.” After killing Sidney’s mom one year ago, they’ve kicked off a new murder spree to commemorate the anniversary of her death. Now, Billy’s mother seeks similar vengeance against the innocent young woman who murdered her son.

By contrast, Mrs. Voorhees is much more disturbed. The campers who originally caused her son’s death are long gone, and she must satisfy her grief through proxy revenge. Advancing on Alice, who never met Jason, she exclaims, “You let him drown! You never paid any attention. Look what you did to him!” Unable to process her rage and guilt, the bereaved woman sees all counselors as one and the same, irresponsible teens who deserve to die. Mrs. Loomis racks up a similarly lengthy list of kills, but most of her victims are collateral damage meant to implicate Mickey by mirroring Billy’s crimes. She will off anyone who gets in her way, but Mrs. Loomis’ calculated rage leads to Sidney alone.

Yet beneath these murderous exteriors, both mothers are searching for absolution. After all, they were gone when their sons were in danger. Mrs. Voorhees was working as a cook at the camp, assuming Jason would be safe with the counselors. Mrs. Loomis left her husband in the wake of his betrayal, likely hoping to heal her broken heart in privacy. Neither is responsible for their sons’ misfortune. However, they both secretly believe that had they only been present, they could have protected their children from harm. Their murderous rage hides misplaced anger and guilt over this perceived abandonment. And they are not alone in this self-condemnation. Ever since Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho gave us Norma Bates — whose own son Billy references —  we’ve perfected the misogynist art of blaming a mother for the crimes of her son.

But Mrs. Voorhees has a more memorable legacy. When Casey bungles Ghostface’s infamous question, “Name the killer in Friday the 13th,” she sparks an exciting new type of slasher. Billy and Stu have grown up watching Mrs. Voorhees’s story and patterned their own “movie” after that of her son. This surprising moment passes a torch from the original guard of slasher killers to those who will push the subgenre to new heights. As he chases Sidney with a knife, Billy insists, “Movies don’t create psychos. Movies make psychos more creative!”

Mrs. Loomis may pin her motive on Sidney, but she owes her existence to Mr. Voorhees.

Click to comment

Editorials

‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements

Published

on

Bloodlust: Subspecies III

The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.

However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.

That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.

A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.

At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.

The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.

In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.

Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.

The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.

In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.

The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.

Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.

Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.

Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.

Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.

Continue Reading