Editorials
UPDATE: Letter From the Editor: Mr. Disgusting’s Quote-Filled Rage!
UPDATE: December 22, 2010. I was informed that MPI was kind enough to remove the quote from the ‘Hatchet II’ box. From France to Spain, and even Japan, Bloody Disgusting has contributing writers all over the world. We love to bring you the first word on upcoming movies straight of out film markets and festivals, which is why we have so many global staffers. While I don’t always agree with their reviews, our motto is that everyone is entitled to their opinion – one of the main reasons we love to push the user reviews on the site. On BD we have the opportunity to bring you a variety of opinions, from various contributors to you guys; there’s a forum for conversation. But what happens when a writer’s quote ends up on a DVD/Blu-ray box without my approval? Read on for the answer.
Again, I support my writers, and their opinions. Ryan Daley hated Splice; I loved it. Keenan loved Rob Zombie’s Halloween; I hated it. It’s all fine and dandy. On the site we ALL have a place to voice our opinion and that’s what makes it special.
But when a Bloody Disgusting quote ends up on a poster, DVD or Blu-ray box, I demand a level of control.
We didn’t build Bloody Disgusting up on whoring ourselves out for favors and special placement. We built it up on our integrity, something that’s so incredibly hard to control the larger you get. While I can go on and on about the various sections on BD, other sites, and news reporting, I want to remain focused on what’s got me steaming from my ears.
This past week two quotes came to my attention:
“An exciting and gory romp into the world of the undead.” Toby Weidmann’s quote on the cover of IFC Midnight’s DVD release of The Horde.
“One of the best slasher films EVER.” Micah’s quote on the cover of Dark Sky Films’ Hatchet II.
Over the past ten years I have taken extreme pride in keeping quotes at bay. There’s nothing that repulses me more than a quote whore, or a site that keeps giving studios quotes so their name will be all over the marketplace. What better way to destroy your name than to put it on a load of sh*t? I demand control over what goes on a poster, DVD or Blu-ray box. While there are a few here or there that slip by me, typical protocol is to ask the owner/editor-in-chief for APPROVAL before sticking our name on promotional materials. It’s just the right thing to do.
Neither Dark Sky/MPI nor IFC asked me for permission.
Colleagues around me say, “It’s free exposure man, be happy!” NO, no, no, no, no, no and NO. I’m NOT happy, I’m goddamn embarrassed. I’m red in the face. While I can write my own reviews for both of these films here on the site, I have no way of standing at every single store in the country pleading my case: “‘The Horde’ sucks ass. It’s a piece of sh*t. It’s one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen. It should be banished for eternity,” or maybe, “While I enjoy the kills in ‘Hatchet II’, its exposition heavy and boring. It is definitely, without shadow of a doubt NOT one of the best slasher films ever.”
Again, I respect my writer’s own opinions, but when a quote lands on a cover it reflects the entire website as a whole. I expect the courtesy of approval, I expect that we’ll be asked if it’s OK to use the site’s name to sell their movie. If I think the movie is a piece of crap, I’m gonna say “no.” I turn down quotes left and right. The most important aspect of keeping it minimal, and keeping it to a certain standard, is that when we DO stick our name of a movie, you as a regular Bloody Disgusting reader know we support it through thick and thin and thus can take it for what it’s worth. It adds weight to the claim. It should evoke an emotion in you without you having to say “here we go again.”
The last thing I want from you guys is to think we’d put our names on anything that’s offered to us. F*ck, if this pisses people off and we never see our name on anything ever again, I’m 100% OK with that. I have integrity. I have pride. And I’ll stick to my mother f*cking guns. I’m proud of what I’ve done here on Bloody Disgusting and I’ll be damned if some crappy DVD release is going to ruin our rep.
Some of you may enjoy both Hatchet 2 and The Horde, and that’s totally cool, I’d just really appreciate the courtesy of being asked if I want our site’s name on the DVD/Blu-ray cover.
End of story.
Just for fun, off the top of my head here are some quotes I’m proud of: Marebito, Shutter, Splinter, Lady Vengeance, Burning Bright, The Collector, Joshua, Them, Inside, Frontier(s), and Dance of the Dead.
Here are some quotes that will embarrass me until I’m six feet under: Otis, Diary of the Dead, Mother of Tears, Halloween, Nightmare Man and Borderland.
Editorials
‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements
The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.
However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.
That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.
A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.
At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.
The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.
In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.
Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.
The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.
In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.
The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.
Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.
Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.
Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.
Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.

You must be logged in to post a comment.