Connect with us

Editorials

Time to Revisit…’Burnt Offerings’

Published

on

In this installment of “Time to Revisit” I take a look at the underrated 1976 “evil house” flick Burnt Offerings – directed by Dark Shadows creator Dan Curtis – as compared to the schlocky 1979 pseudo-classic The Amityville Horror. While Amityville debuted to blockbuster box-office on release and went on to spawn seven terrible sequels and a slick 2005 remake, Burnt Offerings – starring Oliver Reed and Karen Black as a married couple who with their young son and elderly aunt (Bette Davis!) are tormented by a hostile force in a rundown country estate – has remained a relatively unheralded entry in the “haunted house” sub-genre. So why does Amityville get all the love? Inside I make my case for why the superior Burnt Offerings – which is also based on a best-selling 1970s novel, albeit one that didn’t try to pass itself off as a work of non-fiction – deserves to be lifted off the back of the DVD shelf and given a second look.
Beloved Favorite: The Amityville Horror (1979)

Number of votes on IMDB: 11,586

The Plot: Based on the novel of the same name, a young family is tormented and eventually driven away by malevolent forces after moving into a new home.

Why it’s so celebrated: While it’s not exactly what you would call a bona fide horror classic – at least not in the sense of artistically superior efforts like The Exorcist or The ShiningThe Amityville Horror was nevertheless a blockbuster title when released and continues to be widely known today. One of the earliest films to market the hell out of its “based on true events” angle (though the Lutz family’s claims have been largely debunked since), the Stuart Rosenberg-directed film went on to spawn a series of increasingly lame sequels, in addition to a hit 2005 remake starring Ryan Reynolds and Melissa George. Indeed, since its release, the film and the franchise it spawned has become one of the most recognizable properties in the history of the genre.

Why it’s time to back-burner it for awhile: Despite a few fun moments that fall squarely in the realm of ’70s horror schlock and an Oscar-nominated score by Lalo Schifrin, The Amityville Horror isn’t really all that good. It’s clumsy, histrionic to the point of farce, and boasts mostly lame effects, not to mention that it’s already enjoyed an illustrious run. Hell, it made $86 million when it was first released – over $250 million in today’s dollars! Did I mention that it’s not very good?

Underappreciated Also-Ran: Burnt Offerings (1976)

Number of votes on IMDB: 2,637

The Plot: Based on the novel of the same name, a young family is tormented and eventually driven mad by malevolent forces after moving into a new summer home.

Why it’s not so celebrated: Though it preceded The Amityville Horror by three years and is in almost every way a better film, Burnt Offerings has nevertheless been mostly forgotten by modern audiences. Part of this is likely due to its slow narrative pace and absence of most of the usual fright-flick histrionics, a sensibility that doesn’t translate well into the 21st century. It also wasn’t a blockbuster like Amityville, and the Robert Marasco book it was based on simply doesn’t enjoy the same amount of notoriety as Jay Anson’s controversial work of “non-fiction”, which is still well-remembered to this day.

Why it deserves a revisiting: It’s no five-star classic by any means, but Burnt Offerings is still one of the more underrated horror outings of the last 40 years. Some impatient viewers may call it boring, but those with a taste for slow-burn horror will find much to appreciate here. Director Dan Curtis, best known for the gothic soap opera Dark Shadows that aired in the late ’60s and early ’70s and which is currently being remade by Tim Burton for Warner Bros., works up a suitably tense atmosphere in the early going, imbuing the sunny summer setting with a sense of gauzy, unquantifiable dread. The film is light on overt shocks until late in the third act, during which Curtis once again utilizes star Karen Black’s unnervingly off-kilter gaze to spine-tingling effect (something he similarly accomplished in the final shot of his 1975 TV anthology Trilogy of Terror).

As for the cast, what can I say? Oliver Reed and Black are rock-solid as Ben and Marion Rolf, a married couple with a young son who along with Ben’s spry old aunt Elizabeth decide to rent a large, run-down country house from a mysterious old couple (Burgess Meredith and Eileen Heckart, appearing in one scene only) for the summer. The price of $900 for two full months appears too good to be true, even after the couple reveals that their elderly mother, a recluse who occupies the attic bedroom on the third floor, must have her meals delivered twice daily without being bothered.

Black, at her bizarre best here, suggests from the get-go that there’s something not quite right about Marion – though perhaps unintentionally, given the actress’ naturally oddball demeanor – and Reed’s actorly intensity is a good fit for a role that sees him going from mind-numbing fear to unhinged mania and back again. As aunt Elizabeth, Bette Davis is expectedly top-notch, giving a recognizably human dimension to a character who begins the film as a sprightly 60-something woman and ends it as a bedridden crone.

Given the relative subtlety of its storytelling Burnt Offerings won’t be to every horror fan’s taste, but rest assured there are some genuinely spine-tingling bits here, including the aforementioned shock conclusion and several instances in which Ben is haunted by the sight of a ghostly hearse from his past, driven by perhaps the most terrifying chauffer in movie history (the eerie Anthony James, an actor who appeared opposite Clint Eastwood in both High Plains Drifter and Unforgiven). The sight of his grinning face made the blood of even this hardened horror buff run ice cold.

Clip:

Advertisement
1 Comment

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading