Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Horror Retrospective: 1932 (Editorial)

Published

on

Article by Geoff Fogleman

Welcome to 1932 – a year that gave us some truly gruesome horror. After bringing Dracula to the screen in 1931, Tod Browning got his Freaks on in a major way and proved beyond a doubt that he and James Whale were the go-to early horror directors. Speaking of James Whale, his The Old Dark House showcased the often comedic side of horror, and the film allowed him to show his versatility behind the camera. We were also terrified (yet again) by Boris Karloff in Universal’s The Mummy, became a captive on The Island of Lost Souls, and were sucked in to a wonderful low-budget take on vampire lore in Carl Th. Dreyer’s Vampyr.

Of course, this weekly editorial is only one person’s opinion, and my reasons for creating it are two-fold: 1) to hopefully introduce you to some early horror films that you may not be aware of, and 2) to foster discussion about classic horror. I’m hoping that if you have a dissenting opinion (which you surely do!), then you’ll comment on my lists and post your own in the comments section. Happy watching!

THE YEAR: 1932

FREAKS
(D) Tod Browning
(W) Clarence “Tod” Robbins
(S) Wallace Ford, Leila Hyams, and Olga Baclanova
If you’ve never seen Freaks then stop reading this and go watch it right now. Seriously, the list will be here when you get back . . . finished watching yet? Good. Freaks is not only the best horror film of 1932, it’s one of the best horror films of all time. Cleopatra (Baclanova) is a lovely circus trapeze artist who professes her love for Hans (Harry Earles). What’s the big deal, right? Well Hans is a midget in the circus side show, and, despite his fellow freaks’ insistence that Cleopatra is using him, Hans falls for her. As it turns out, Cleopatra doesn’t want Hans – she’s having an affair with circus strongman Hercules (Henry Victor) – but she does want the large sum of money that he’s set to inherit. The story climaxes with Hans and Cleopatra’s wedding party, where she drunkenly confesses her disdain for the freaks. At the risk of spoiling anything, let’s just say that the freaks get their revenge in chilling fashion (you have to love Pre-Code horror!). I’ve watched Freaks about a dozen times, and it still gives me nightmares, which is exactly what the best horror is supposed to do.

freaks-1932

ISLAND OF LOST SOULS
(D) Erle C. Kenton
(W) Waldemar Young and Philip Wylie
(S) Charles Laughton, Richard Arlen, and Bela Lugosi
This is one of several film adaptations of H.G. Wells’s The Island of Dr. Moreau, and it’s also one of the best. After being shipwrecked, Edward Parker (Arlen) is rescued by a freighter filled with animals and headed toward an island owned by Dr. Moreau (Laughton). A disagreement with the captain of the boat (Stanley Fields) ensues, and Parker is left with little choice but to accompany Moreau to the island, where he quickly becomes aware that all is not what it seems. The atmosphere of dread, the excellent make-up, and outstanding performances by all involved are what make Island of Lost Souls stand out. If you want a fun double bill, watch this one and then Don Taylor’s The Island of Dr. Moreau (1977) – just stay away from the awful 1996 version!

ISLAND OF LOST SOULS-1932

THE OLD DARK HOUSE
(D) James Whale
(W) Benn W. Levy
(S) Boris Karloff, Melvyn Douglas, and Charles Laughton
Based on the novel by J.B. Priestley, The Old Dark House is one of the earliest (and finest) examples of the horror comedy genre. The story revolves around a group of five travelers who seek shelter from a storm at the titular manse. Little do they know that the house belongs to the decidedly crazy Fenn family and their mute butler, Morgan (Karloff). After some ominous exchanges between the travelers, things really heat up when a drunken Morgan releases Saul (Brember Wills), a pyromaniac who attempts to set the house on fire at every opportunity. Once again Karloff plays a role in which he must act under heavy makeup and grunt a lot, and he’s wonderful.

THE OLD DARK HOUSE-1932

THE MUMMY
(D) Karl Freund
(W) John L. Balderston
(S) Boris Karloff, Zita Johann, and David Manners
Speaking of Karloff being under heavy makeup and grunting a lot, we get yet another stand out performance from him in The Mummy. Karloff plays Imhotep, a former Egyptian priest who was mummified while still alive for sacrilege. Imhotep is resurrected when an archaeological team finds his body and recites the spell from The Scroll of Thoth (don’t these guys know you should never read aloud in horror movies?). All Imhotep wants to do when he is resurrected is find his former lover, the princess Ankh-es-en-amon, and he escapes to the streets of Cairo to do so. Fast forward ten years from his resurrection, and Imhotep, who now goes by the name Ardath Bay, is living comfortably in Cairo yet still searching for his lost love. The plot culminates with Bay finding Helen Grosvenor (Johann) – the woman he believes is the modern incarnation of Ankh-es-en-amon. Bay wants to mummify Grosvenor then resurrect her so that the two former lovers can be together forever. There’s really nothing quite like a quiet evening of mummification and resurrection to really set the mood. Karloff proves the bromide, as he did in Frankenstein, that you can’t keep a good man down.

The-Mummy-1932-Boris-Karloff

VAMPYR
(D) Carl Th. Dreyer
(W) Christen Jul and Carl Th. Dreyer
(S) Julian West, Maurice Schutz, and Rena Mandel
You want creepy? This little gem from Danish filmmaker Carl Theodore Dreyer fits the bill nicely. The visuals in Vampyr alone are enough to recommend this film – think German Expressionism meets Gothic architecture – but we are fortunate to get an intriguing story line as well. While staying at an inn, Allan Gray (West) receives a small package with a note containing the cryptic instructions “To be opened upon my death.” His curiosity aroused, Gray follows a series of shadows to a looming castle, where he witnesses the murder of the man who gave him the parcel. After some eerie events Gray decides to open the package, and he finds a copy of a book on Vampyrs. Gray becomes convinced that the mysterious goings on in the castle and surrounding village are due to vampire activity, and it’s up to him to save the day (not to mention the damsel). As an added bonus, the Vampyr DVD and Blu-ray are available on Criterion, so now the iconic cinematography is much clearer than in previous versions.

VAMPYR-1932

2 Comments

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading