Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

How To Start Getting Into Horror Part 12: Zombies

Published

on

When it comes to horror, perhaps the most immediate image that comes to mind these days are zombies. After all, the popularity of “The Walking Dead” has pretty much reached everyone in some way, shape, or form. Now everyone thinks they know how to survive a zombie apocalypse. Pfft…

But what these people fail to realize is that zombie films have a long and rich history throughout cinema, resulting in films that have amazing things to say about society, about human nature, and about the very world we live in and how we treat it. The zombie subgenre is full of incredible films that should be seen by non-horror fans, not just as a way to introduce them into the genre but as a point of discussion about issues larger than the face value these movies offer.

Story time: My father is an avid reader. Like, voracious. In fact, it might not be a bad analogy to compare the amount of his reading to the amount of human flesh zombies want to consume. One day after reading Max Brooks’ fantastic “World War Z“, I told my father about it and how he should give it a chance. My father, who has a rather negative impression of horror altogether, immediately declined, not giving me a chance to explain why HE should give it a chance.

Long story short, I left the book on his couch. You see, my dad is the kind of guy who can’t help himself when it comes to books. You put one near him and he simply has to leaf through it. And that’s exactly what he did. A few pages in the middle, a few pages a bit later on, just getting a taste of things. And then he decided to start from the beginning.

A week or so later, I went to my parents for dinner and my father excitedly began telling me how much he loved the book. He was blown away by the rich and thorough accounts, the detailed cultures, and the intricately woven story. While he may not have decided to go any further into horror, I still had that victory!

For those who DO wish to dip their toes in a little further, I am here to offer a few suggestions on where to begin.

It would be remiss of me to say that George A. Romero’s Night of the Living Dead was the first zombie film. That title is often bestowed upon Victor Halperin’s 1932 film White Zombie, which follows the more Haitian belief of zombies. And while the latter is absolutely a must-see film that has a great many merits, it’s the former that really blew the doors open on the subgenre.

I’ve mentioned it before on here, but I remember watching this movie in my History Of Horror After Psycho course that I took at the University of Michigan (hail!). We spent three hours afterwards discussing the social commentary of the film without once mentioning the word “zombie”, instead talking about race relations, gender roles, the concept of the “living room war”, material commercialism, and more. It was one of the most entertaining and fascinating debates I’d ever been a part of and proved to me that horror not only has a place in our culture but that it’s extremely important in showing us the horror of what’s wrong in today’s society while giving us an opportunity to not have to face it directly, instead using horror’s images to explain the faults and issues.

It also helps that Night of the Living Dead is an extremely entertaining film. While it has definitely aged, something I don’t think anyone can argue, it’s still a frightening and extremely effective film with some truly unsettling and horrifying moments. As a starting point, this lays down the foundations very effectively for those who wish to just get a good scare as much as it does for those who want something more out of their film-watching experience.

Once that’s done, why not move on to Return of the Living Dead? Immediately challenge the concept that zombies can be killed by a strong blow to the head with this film so as to let viewers know that rules can and will be broken, no matter how sacred or golden they may be. Plus, they’ll get introduced to Tarman, who is always a blast to see.

Then, just to change the rules on them once again, move on to Danny Boyle’s phenomenal 28 Days Later. What helps viewers get into this film is that the cast and crew are from other very popular properties. Tell them that Boyle directed Slumdog Millionaire or Trainspotting and you’ll pique a lot of interest. Or how about having Cillian Murphy (Batman Begins), Naomie Harris (Skyfall), and Brendan Gleeson (Harry Potter, Braveheart)? These are familiar faces, which helps give a sense of security for those watching the film since the enjoyed these actors in other roles.

After those, you can start showing the other Romero films, maybe some of the remakes (Dawn of the Dead is especially fun and exciting), and toss in a zinger like Warm Bodies to add some romance into the mix.

But a great way to cap things off is by showing Shaun of the Dead, which appreciates the rules as much as it enjoys poking fun at them. It’s smart, it’s funny, and it’s a damn good way to show that zombie films can be fun and thoroughly entertaining.

Alright readers, it’s time for you to chime in. What films do you think should be used to introduce someone to the zombie subgenre? Let me know in the comments below!

Check out the rest of our How To Start Getting Into Horror series.

24 Comments

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading